Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Transfer - NO [Stating a Fact!]
Matthew Reeds mgreeds at reeds.uk.comSat Aug 18 18:52:26 BST 2007
- Previous message: WHO (?) Orders imaging, lab, and therapy
- Next message: Transmediastinal GSW: to the underqualified
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim, Absolutely. My comment referred to the trauma patient that is UNSTABLE who should go to either the OR or the angio suite for EMERGENCY intervention. I meant to state that and hereby clarify so now. I didn't intend to refer to STABLE patients in my statement which does, as you quite rightly say, change things in that those patients do not then need to be IMMEDIATELY "scooped and run" to the OR. However I am aware of many occasions where trauma patients have languished in certain A+Es/EDs for many hours with cyclic volume resuscitation because they were "STABLE" and didn't need to go straight to the OR, which is undoubtedly harmful to the patients and their outcomes! This though is a different debate. I agree completely with what you say regarding STABLE trauma patients who have selective non-operative management and can go to either the ICU, CT scanner +/- angio suite or even the "normal" ward. Naturally it depends upon each individual patient, their injuries and their determined clinical management plan as to where they should go next for further care. This leaves aside the issue of STABLE trauma patients who MAY still go straight to the OR for surgery once their condition has been RAPIDLY "optimised" without further delay. Matthew R Surgery UK -----Original Message----- From: Hardcastle, Tim, Dr <tch at sun.ac.za> [mailto:tch at sun.ac.za] Sent: 18 August 2007 05:28 To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: Transfer - NO [Stating a Fact!] Matt Qualify your statement to say "the UNSTABLE trauma patient" and I'm altogether with you. Stable patients deserve a work-up; this has been where SNOM has come from - they get sorted in the ED then go to the ICU / ward, rather than the OR. This group is NOT best served by direct transfer to the OR. Tim Dr T C Hardcastle M.B.,Ch.B.(Stell); M.Med(Chir); FCS(SA) Senior Surgeon / Senior Lecturer: Surgery (Trauma and ICU) ATLS instructor and DSTC Cape Town Course Director Intern program Coordinator: Surgery M.Med (Emergency Medicine) Executive Committee member Clinical Head (Director): Diana Princess of Wales Trauma Unit Division of Surgery (General) Room 4064 Department of Surgical Sciences Tygerberg Hospital / University of Stellenbosch PO Box 19063 Tygerberg 7505 Western Cape South Africa e-mail: tch at sun.ac.za Cell: +27824681615 Office: +27219389281 or 4911 pager 0302 -----Original Message----- "There is no role for the A+E/ED in trauma. It is merely to keep the patient warm whilst being 'scooped and run' to the OR! A+E/ED doctors role in trauma are as pre-hospital care clinicians which many of them have now encompassed to become trauma team leaders with air ambulances/pre-hospital care teams etc. They are there to implement the Platinum 10 or the Diamond 5.that is get the patient to the OR as quickly as possible for definitive or damage control surgery using permissive hypotension etc.!!" The latter comment has prompted many antagonistic comments within the A+Es/EDs of many of my regional hospitals for my outspoken opinion. I am sorry about this..but I will not apologise for stating what is obvious in acting in the patient's best interests.
- Previous message: WHO (?) Orders imaging, lab, and therapy
- Next message: Transmediastinal GSW: to the underqualified
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
