Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Quik-Clot
Richard Wigle MD FACS rlwigle at yahoo.comThu Aug 16 19:34:01 BST 2007
- Previous message: Quik-Clot
- Next message: Quik-Clot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I doubt there was any evidence at all to back up the 24 hour claim. Agreed that what we saw was seldom left on for more that an hour or two-- I was just commenting on what was being presented to the field soldiers --- Stephen Richey <stephen.richey at gmail.com> wrote: > Dr. Wigle, > I'm finishing up a final revision of a literature review > on tourniquets and > one of the things I have encountered is evidence that > they can be left on > for several hours, I believe twelve hours being the > longest I have seen > described without serious complications. However that > was in a cold > environment during WWII, so I don't know how well that > could be extrapolated > to the deserts of the Middle East. Most likely, whomever > told you 24 hours > was either misinformed or at least relying upon evidence > I do not have > access to. Even I, one of the most staunch supporters of > their use under > appropriate circumstances, would cringe at such a > suggestion. But then > again, I know how well the military takes to having > inconsistencies or > errors being pointed out by people outside of positions > of > authority.....that is a topic for another time though. > > However, if you are familiar with the article by > Rasmussen et al regarding > vascular injuries presenting to Balad, there were few, if > any, cases of > extremely prolonged field times associated with those who > presented with > tourniquets in place. The vast majority of patients were > in the Theater > Hospital within an hour of being wounded. I don't have > that paper directly > in front of me at the moment, so that is why I can't > speak in absolute terms > regarding it. > > Also interestingly I should point out that the one of my > experiences with > QuikClot was a laceration on my thumb and I figured it > was a good chance to > try out a sample of it that I had received on a half inch > laceration without > arterial injury or other complicating issues. It did not > even seem to do > anything worthy of note. However, your mileage may vary. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:03:05 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Richard Wigle MD FACS <rlwigle at yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: Quik-Clot > > To: "Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" > <trauma-list at trauma.org> > > Message-ID: <43009.1129.qm at web38806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > > > AS Far as I know Quikclot is still being used in the > Iraqi > > theater. I've been retired about 5 months now and so > have > > been out of the loop. My personal experience with it > wasn't > > especially impressive other than having to clean it up, > the > > thermal problems were, again in my experience, > annecdotal. > > > > As Stephen notes I think one of the major problems with > it > > and some of the other products is that they tend to > become > > an excuse for incomplete training and, when introduced > at > > the lowest levels, become a wonder cure for all that > ails > > you. I saw the same thing with tourniquet use and, > while > > there is absolutely no doubt that tourniquets have > saved > > many lives in Iraq, they were being applied in place of > > proper dressing (granted that in the field proper > dressing > > sometimes becomes a luxury). At any rate I was actually > > told as part of my training (same as the enlisted folks > > got- one size fits all but it was enlightening)that > > touriquets could be left in place for 24 hours and when > I > > suggested that perhaps this was not the way to go I was > > told not to upset the apple cart. > > > > Anyway we have to remember that many of these products > are > > being touted by people with a personal stake in there > use. > > I recently pulled out a couple of reviews on all the > > products. I'm on the road at present and my computer > has > > crashed so I'm relying on internet cafes and hotel > access > > points but if anyone is interested once I get someplace > > stable I will be happy to forward them, they're not > hard to > > find with google scholar. > > > > I'm sure others out there have had different > experiences > > with all of these products > > > > R Wigle > > --- Stephen Richey <stephen.richey at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I am not certain if it is still being used in Iraq > and > > > Afghanistan or not. > > > I have only anecdotal evidence (n= ~5) for the use of > > > Quikclot in my > > > personal experience (in civilian situations), but I > have > > > to say I wasn't > > > that impressed by it. It just seems to make one heck > of > > > a mess of things > > > but not really do much in the way of hemostasis > beyond > > > what you would > > > normally get from a pressure dressing. I used to > teach > > > the US Army combat > > > lifesaver course (last time I taught it was in 2003) > and > > > I personally > > > deemphasized (I covered it but put a word of caution > in > > > the presentation > > > about the hazards of relying upon such agents when > more > > > efficacious methods > > > exist) the use of currently available hemostatic > agents > > > in favor of > > > aggressive use of pressure dressings and tourniquets > for > > > immediate > > > hemorrhage control on extremities, particularly in a > care > > > under fire > > > setting. > > > > > > If I can offer any further information on the US > > > military's training, please > > > let me know. If I don't have a solid answer for you, > I > > > can put you in touch > > > with some contacts of mine who might be better > positioned > > > to advise you. > > > Feel free to contact me off the list. Have a nice > day. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Stephen L. Richey, CRT > > > > > > "It is better to know some of the questions than all > of > > > the answers."- James > > > Thurber > > > -- > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers > from someone who > > knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:39:06 +0100 > > From: "JOSE SUAREZ PELAEZ" <josuarez at teleline.es> > > Subject: Re: Estimated fluid and blood losses > classification. > > To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" > <trauma-list at trauma.org> > > Message-ID: <002901c7df0f$5e3084d0$2501a8c0 at pc> > > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; > charset="iso-8859-1"; > === message truncated === ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
- Previous message: Quik-Clot
- Next message: Quik-Clot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
