Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Why are crystalloids better > pressors ?= NEITHER
Alex Garbino agarbino at gmail.comMon Aug 6 04:28:45 BST 2007
- Previous message: Why are crystalloids better > pressors ?= NEITHER
- Next message: Best Pressor Research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As you look at the new techniques to monitor perfusion (NIR instead of BP, etc), I would also look at some of the new work regarding slow reperfusion protocols. Remember that it's not so much the lack of oxygen as much as the sudden onrush of oxygen after deprivation that causes cell death (mostly via free radicals, etc). These protocols are being intensely researched in cardiovascular events, etc.; but I think this would apply to trauma, TBIs, and any other state where tissue is exposed to hypoxia. Maybe in the future patients will undergo permissive hypotension and slow reperfusion as opposed to today's immediate massive reperfusion, 100% O2 masks, etc. Alex Garbino On 8/5/07, KMATTOX at aol.com <KMATTOX at aol.com> wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/5/2007 9:12:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > ih7 at msn.com > writes: > > What I don't understand is why crystalloids help - they do not increase > oxygen delivery meaningfully.. > but they keep the BP and CO, - is that useful for the body ?? Why ? > > What if we just keep up the BP and not the CO - by using pressors > ?? (now I > am questioning the dogma). > Would patients become more acidotic and have low SvO2 more than with > crystalloids ? > > > > > The BIG fallacy here is that we continue to assume that CO and BP are our > objective of resuscitation. WRONG. Whether it be brain, kidney, gut, > or big > toe preservation, it is perfusion and oxygen extraction that is > essential, > with variables of temperature, pH, etc. altering the exchange. That > is why > NIR would be much better than the BP cuff. Whether it is MAST, drugs, > crystalloids, or position, any attempt to resuscitate based on BP as an > end > point simply is living in the 1960s and not the 21st > century. Get your > head out of the past and into current thinking. You need to go no > further than > Karim Brohi's trauma.org pages to get an excellent review of this > subject. > > k > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL > at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >
- Previous message: Why are crystalloids better > pressors ?= NEITHER
- Next message: Best Pressor Research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
