Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?
HAXScott at aol.com HAXScott at aol.comFri Sep 1 00:35:51 BST 2006
- Previous message: WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?
- Next message: WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Further, a quick review of the literature would yield uncommon but very real problems associated with the Combitube, including multiple cases of esophageal rupture. I can share multiple anecdotes of the LMA being used successfully as a rescue airway after failed intubation. In the past year at least two adult patient have arrived in our TRU after failed intubation by other hospitals and were successfully ventilated and oxygenated without substantial aspiration. In my own experience, Combitubes are used quite commonly by our ground EMS teams, and as a primary airway by some EMT-B and EMT-I level providers, and we covert a number of Combitube placements to tracheal tube. Conversion to ETT is much easier with the LMA than with the Combitube. I have had success (though the rate in the literature is low, about 50%) with converting LMA to ETT simply by intubating the trachea with a bougie via the LMA and advancing an ETT over the bougie once the LMA was removed... and what of our children? There is no pediatric version of the Combitube. The LMA has been used world-over as a rescue device for pediatric failed airway, including children with major craniofacial anomalies. Mr. MacKinnon, I'm glad to see you can conduct a literature search and include only those reviews, that which support your belief. The truth and reality, back down here with the rest of us, about the LMA and it's use as a rescue airway, is that it's NOT nearly as bad of a device as you would paint it, and that the risk of aspiration, is greatly exaggerated by detractors of the device such as yourself. I'm truly very sorry to inform you, that the LMA has proven it's utility as a rescue device in hospitals and in the field the world over. While admittably, the available evidence may be conflicting, we are at the very least assured that aspiration with the LMA is rare, as proven by large trials in important and unbiased efforts by a number of investigators, and there is absolutely no question that it's proven itself. My hat is off to Archie Brain.
- Previous message: WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?
- Next message: WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
