Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
FW: Carboxyhemoglobin Levels
Ian Seppelt SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.auThu Oct 26 00:06:55 BST 2006
- Previous message: III INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "TELEMEDICINE - EXPERIENCE@PROSPECTS"
- Next message: FW: Carboxyhemoglobin Levels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pret, that was NOT the conclusion of the Cochrane review (and you have selectively quoted from the plain language summary) and you are letting your own biases get in the way. Their conclusion was very much one of equipoise, ie "Existing randomized trials do not establish whether the administration of HBO to patients with carbon monoxide poisoning reduces the incidence of adverse neurologic outcomes. Additional research is needed to better define the role, if any, of HBO in the treatment of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. This research question is ideally suited to a multi-center randomized controlled trial." Cheers, Ian Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM Senior Staff Specialist Dept of Intensive Care Medicine The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney >>> pbjorn at emh.org 26/10/2006 3:55am >>> Who are you trying to kid? I'm rarely at a loss for an opinion. The only difference between me and the average tunnel-visioned a**hole is that I'm regularly confronted by how stupid I can be -- and I try hard to be grateful for the reminders. Keeps me humble. Mostly. Only because it's easiest, I'll refer readers back to Dr. Seppelt's recent post. I've voiced my concerns over relying on The Cochrane group, but in this report their plain language summary is succinct: "No evidence to support use of hyperbaric oxygen for treatment of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning." Thanks for the invite, by the way. It's roughly the same trip that Maine clinicians would have to arrange for a critical patient to receive hyperbaric therapy in a chamber larger than a cut-rate casket. And thus I must ask: why would we go to all the trouble, expense, and out-of-hospital exposure to provide our patients with an unproven remedy -- and in all likelihood, hours too late? Pret -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Ronald Gross Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:06 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Cc: George Perdrizet Subject: RE: FW: Carboxyhemoglobin Levels Pret, How unlike you to be so opinionated - sorta like the guy who doesn't know how to answer when asked, by his wife's divorce lawyer, "Exactly when did you stop beating your wife?" No facts to base his assertion upon, but made it anyway. I would refer you to an extensive body of literature (most but definitely not all of it well researched and written) that will show even those who have already made up their minds to the contrary, that there actually are disease processes out there that are in need of this particular treatment. Before you impale yourself on the sword of the "anti-hyperbaric religious right stance", I humbly suggest that you come down south a couple hundred miles from your perch in Maine to a city called Hartford (still, last I checked, on planet Earth) and avail yourself to the knowledge of a pretty savvy clinician, educator, scientist and researcher (Dr. George Perdrizet) and look at the results of the hyperbaric medicine program that he has developed and brought along. You just might think twice before launching into the sort of thing that Rob Smith was referring to the other day - and that I mentioned above - and that would be religious condemnation of that which we are not really familiar with. Just my humble opinion....... Ron >>> "Bjorn, Pret" <pbjorn at emh.org> 10/25/2006 9:50 AM >>> You don't read many pages on HBO before you bump into the assertion that it's basically a treatment in search of a disease. But beyond that debate, let me observe that its benefits -- anecdotal, academic, hypothetical or otherwise -- must be measured in the context of what a pain in the ass it is. Finding, accessing, and delivering care in a chamber matching the needs of a critically ill or injured patient usually generates more risk and frustration than benefit. A chamber with real medical functionality is, for most of the planet, out of reach. Little wonder that there's no reliable literature when the proper equipment is far more likely to be found on a sub base than in a licensed hospital, much less a trauma center. JMO Pret Bjorn Bangor, ME USA -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Ian Seppelt Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 10:54 PM To: Medic541 at hotmail.com; trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Re: FW: Carboxyhemoglobin Levels COHb is merely a marker of CO exposure and the absolute level does not help a lot without knowing the history (and mechanism) of intoxication and duration of oxygen therapy before the blood was taken. It is unfortuantely a medical student myth that CO causes "hypoxic hypoxia" by irreversibly binding to Hb. While the irreversible binding bit is true, it is irrelevant. A patient with COHb 50% is likely to die (even though there is still 50% oxyHb) while a patient who has lost half a blood volume on the road (replaced with Ringers) could well be fine, depending on what the injuries are. A dog experiment from the 1970s involved severe CO exposure (to COHb 60 - 70%) and then exchange transfusions. The intoxicated dogs died anyway, even with perfectly good non CO blood from donors, whereas when the COHb 70% blood was infused into other volunteer dogs they were fine, and just behaved as if they were a bit anaemic (increased HR and CO). In fact the problem with CO is what the molecule does at the tissue and enzymatic level, for example the irreversible lipid peroxidation which explains all the neurological toxicity from CO. In terms of therapy there is a large can of worms, polarised by true believers and non believers. True believers in HBO point to significant improvements in things like the long term neurological sequelae of CO intoxication, but the quality of evidence is at the level of case series. There are serious flaws in most of the controlled trials. The strongest is Weaver LK, Hopkins RO, Chan KJ, Churchill S, Elliott CG, Clemmer TP, Orme JF, Thomas FO, Morris AH. Hyperbaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning. New England Journal of Medicine 2002;347(14):1057-67. It is also likely that outcomes vary depending on aetiology. In Australia most CO intoxication is either due to attempts at suicide, or due to enclosed fires (ie house fires, where a lot of other nasties are inhaled as well). In colder climes much more of the exposures are industrial or accidental, and it is likely that outcomes are different in these different groups. The most recent Cochrane review is attached for your interest. Cheers, Ian Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM Senior Staff Specialist Dept of Intensive Care Medicine The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney >>> Medic541 at hotmail.com 24/10/2006 7:42am >>> To all on this group. Some advice is needed regarding carboxyhemoglobin levels on certain patients. What levels are permissible to treat only with 1.0 Fio2? What levels are treated with a hyperbaric therapy? Let's start from neonates all the way up to the elderly. If anyone has some advice or a website that might point me in the right direction. That would be helpful as well. I'm trying to find hard numbers, but I cant seem to Google it for the life of me. Thanks' Anthony M. Caruso NREMT-P -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ###################################################################### Attention: This message is intended for the addresses named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Sydney West Area Health Service. This e-mail has been scanned for viruses ###################################################################### -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ###################################################################### Attention: This message is intended for the addresses named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Sydney West Area Health Service. This e-mail has been scanned for viruses ######################################################################
- Previous message: III INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "TELEMEDICINE - EXPERIENCE@PROSPECTS"
- Next message: FW: Carboxyhemoglobin Levels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
