Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Stingray again
p.bjorn p.bjorn at netzero.netFri Oct 20 23:59:50 BST 2006
- Previous message: Stingray again
- Next message: Stingray again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
1. I think that a doctor or nurse or scrub tech relating my health information on the internet without my permission violates my privacy. Good thing for the victim that the barb's target wasn't external genitalia, lest THAT be described to several thousand rumor mongers around the world by now. Putting myself in this victim's sandals, I would expect that my injury's supposed importance (scientific or, as is the case, clearly otherwise) would easily merit my consent -- and earn its pursuit. Speaking honestly, the greedy capitalist in me might well be interested in keeping certain details for myself (and Larry King or Diane Sawyer). There's money in those details, and I've got open heart surgery to pay for. 2. What I think has almost precisely zero influence on the federal laws of the United States of America. Especially where privacy is concerned (but indeed on curiously contrary levels, healthcare- and wiretap-wise). 3. Not clearly understanding where your tongue ends and your cheek begins, I remind you of a couple of basic principles of stingrayology: that the stinger is a purely defensive device, and that rays aren't known for pouncing onto unsuspecting anglers. A fat lot of good it did THAT ray, after all. Kind Regards, Pret ----- Original Message ----- From: <bensonblues at comcast.net> To: <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:25 PM Subject: Stingray again > Pret, > > I thought this was an educational list-serve. If we, as educators and medical professionals, did not discuss interesting and challenging cases, what would we discuss - politics? Oh, that's right - we do that as well. > > On my planet, we publish cases in the literature all the time - without the patient's consent or knowledge - and we protect their identity the best we can. If we didn't, medical progress would severely be impeded. However, when a case is presented with the same detail on CNN... > > This is extemely valuable information. As the stingray jihad against homo sapiens continues to grow, health care professionals need to know how to handle these cases. If I were the victim, I would be honored to have those who saved my life tell others so that others may be saved. Come on, Mr. Bjorn, do you really think this man's right to privacy was violated? Do you think the victim cares? Would you? > > My brother the biologist has an interesting theory: he believes that the stinger has receptors that detect the rapidly beating heart, mistaking the precordium for the movement of a fish. So, if you are unlucky enough to find yourself in the same situation as the 2 sentinel victims, put your arms and hands over your heart and remain calm. > > DB > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html >
- Previous message: Stingray again
- Next message: Stingray again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
