Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgTue Oct 10 13:50:27 BST 2006
- Previous message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Next message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ian, With all due respect, as I remember it, surgeons operate, and that operation is what the trauma patient needs when the bleeding is audible. Surgeons also provide critical care in the ICU; who better than the surgeon who has just done the case, or the surgeon who might do the case in the near future, and who knows the patient intimately and understands the physiology of the entire patient in front of him/her, to care for that patient? As to your colleagues concept about who does trauma, I suggest that he come on board here and see just how many of the surgeons on this list DO trauma - at the very least that fellow might have to alter his misguided concept just a little bit. Best wishes, Ron >>> "Ian Seppelt" <SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.au> 10/9/2006 12:20 AM >>> Let me weight in to a CONSTRUCTIVE debate! Karim has already highlighted the differences between trauma surgery in the USA and elsewhere in the world, including the difficulty getting subspecialised surgeons interested in trauma. I saw that first hand when I first bought Ken Mattox's book 'Top Knife'. A senior Professor of Surgery (upper GI and oesophageal surgery, weekly oesophagectomy list, etc) came across me reading it, and I described to him the 'Top Knife / Top Gun' analogy, for training the 'best of the best'. "BUT", he pointed out to me, "The BEST surgeons don't DO trauma". So given that in Australia / New Zealand / the UK etc it is difficult to get senior surgeons interested in trauma (with notable exceptions), for the most part it is Emergency Physicians, Intensivists and Anaesthetists that take up the slack. I'm happy to accept that that is substandard compared to having a highly trained 'Trauma Surgey Attending' present when every seriously injured patient arrives, but as Craig Ellis asked, where is the evidence that that is actually correct? What I need is something strong enough that even a senior Professor of Surgery will agree that the evidence supports having trauma surgeons present in the emergency department when the patient arrives. Or could it be that a well trained DOCTOR is what is needed, regardless of specialty, with the ability to activate emergency surgery for the minority of our (predominantly blunt) trauma patients who actually need an operation? Cheers, Ian Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM Senior Staff Specialist Dept of Intensive Care Medicine The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney >>> karim at trauma.org 5/10/2006 6:19am >>> OK, it's possible I overstated the case for the sake of a little argument (the list has been rather quiet recently!) but there are trends here which I believe are important. First, clearly if you are a member of this list, attend trauma conferences, or are an attending at a level 1 trauma centre, chances are that you are committed to trauma/emergency care and you are not the subject of my ranting. However if you consider the whole body of surgeons I think the picture looks less rosy - whether you are in the UK, South Africa, Australia or the US. If you do not work in a Level 1/2 trauma centre, if you are a resident planning on going straight in to private practice, if you are a laparoscopic left adrenal surgeon, I don't believe the same zeal for trauma or emegency surgery is present. If I am totally off base, then I happily stand corrected, and certainly I was exaggerating to make the point. But the fact stands that emergency medicine developed (initially) to fill a vacuum left by surgery, and some specialties (witness cardiothoracics) are retreating to the operating room. We need to make sure trauma or acute care surgery doesn't go the same way. Karim ###################################################################### Attention: This message is intended for the addresses named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Sydney West Area Health Service. This e-mail has been scanned for viruses ###################################################################### -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Next message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
