Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
ACS or local designation
p.bjorn p.bjorn at netzero.netThu Oct 5 17:09:02 BST 2006
- Previous message: ACS or local designation
- Next message: EMS Protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Connie Potter" <Connie at traumafoundation.org> To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 4:27 PM Subject: ACS or local designation Re: ACS and "local" designation. There is NO state or system that calls trauma centers "certified". There are a number of states that have established their own trauma center standards (IL, WA, OR, MD, PA, and more) by adapting the ACS guidelines to the rural nature of their state and DESIGNATE trauma centers. The differences are minor for the most part. I know of no system that would call a hospital a Level II that would otherwise only be an ACS Level IV. Connie, If you think the differences are "minor for the most part," then you've got to get out more. Maine's is one example of a binary, inclusive, voluntary system, resulting in two levels of trauma hospital: the Regional Trauma Center and the Trauma System Hospital. Many administrative spokespersons at Trauma System Hospitals, when asked what level their hospital is, have no familiarity with any sort of third or fourth level, and will therefore predictably answer "Level II." When sophisticated system members answer, correctly, that they're Trauma System Hospitals, the surveyors aren't left with a box they can check. Some will throw a dart into Level III or IV (and be right about half the time), some will talk the System Hospital into Level II, some will leave a blank. I've seen it happen countless times. Likewise when my hospital -- a regional trauma center -- is asked the same question, we struggle to explain the various designation/certification/verification constructs which exist. We are a Maine RTC, which is Level I within our binary system (which can't be properly compared to Texas or Wyoming or California or Illinois); but we are ACS Level II, which is the only reliable common frame of reference. When I'm done explaining this, the questioner invariably asks, "So which level are you?" Whatever you claim to know, or believe has been established in the literature, there are no reliable common denominators for trauma center capability outside of the only international verifying body, that being the ACS. It's not about belonging to anybody's list; it's about structural, functional, and cultural differences from system to system. We can agree that systems improve patient care; but we can't compare systems without describing standards -- and simply having a system does not describe anything close to a standard. Pret
- Previous message: ACS or local designation
- Next message: EMS Protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
