Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
Jane Harper jharper at woh.rr.comWed Oct 4 01:54:19 BST 2006
- Previous message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Next message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Except for those trauma centers that HAVE no residents ... Jane Harper, MS, RN, CCNS, ACNP -------------- "The trained nurse is one of the greatest blessings of humanity, taking a place beside the physician and the priest, and not inferior to either in her mission." -- Sir William Osler, MD > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list- > bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of E Edhayan > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 19:13 > To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list > Subject: Re: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and > stratification) > > Dr. Brohi, > > This is not the experience in the US. > > In Trauma Centers across the US the Trauma patient is cared for on the > Trauma Service staffed by Trauma Surgeons and Surgical Residents from the > ED to the time of discharge. > > Trauma is a big part of surgical training in the US. In fact, on the > oral boards one room is dedicated to Trauma and Critical Care. > > E. Edhayan M.D., FACS > Trauma Medical Director > St. John Hospital > Detroit - Mi 48236 > > Karim Brohi <karim at trauma.org> wrote: > > Not a problem....................I think you have no clue what you are > talking about......... > > Dell > > __________ > > And you clearly have no clue how to positively contribute to a discussion. > > Ken et al. There are two primary reasons why emergency physicians are so > involved in today's care of trauma patients. > > 1. Because over the last 30 years surgeons have abdicated from the care of > the emergency surgical patient. & > > 2. Because it's cheaper to have one resuscitation area in a hospital. > > Of these (1) is by far the most important and most disappointing - and I > see > little sign of it improving. 99% of all surgeons only want to see the > 'good > stuff' ie. Patients who need an operation. They only want to be consulted > once a full work-up is complete (including a CT on all patients!!) and > even > then they'd ideally first meet the patient prepped and draped on the > operating room table. Their only interest is in the technical aspects of > the surgery, and would very much like to hand over care of the patient to > internal medicine as the last stitch is placed. They have minimal > knowledge > of perioperative critical care, limited to a few weeks in residency or a > 3-day critical care course they were made to go on. For the trauma patient > a quick feel of the abdomen and 'there's nothing surgical here' is > baseline > surgical resident response. > > For trauma patients, a trauma team staffed by surgeons, anaesthetists etc > but without an ED physician is still a fully competent trauma team. But if > the surgeons don't turn up because 'it's only a minor injury' or 'we're in > theatre/clinic' - or the surgeons are incompetent - then an eager, present > ED physician is the obvious person who is going to fill that vacuum - at > least while the patient is in the ED. Whether that management is > appropriate depends entirely on the trauma competency of that ED physician > - > but surgical absence, or absence of interest must be a more serious issue. > > How have we got here? Primarily I believe that it's a lack of education > about emergency surgery. Without knowledge of the intricacies of trauma > care, can you really be interested or enthused by it? If your bosses are > only interested in genetic markers of oesophageal cancer, or increasing > survival of pancreatic cancer by 2 weeks with complex surgery, never > educate > you on emergency surgery and its imperatives, never teach emergency > surgical > technique, never enthuse you about perioperative care, never release you > from elective surgery to even see the emergencies, the outcome is > inevitable. Note there is nothing beyond ATLS in most surgeons' trauma > education. > > Unfortunately I see no answers in the new 'Acute Care Surgery'. The > primary > motivator for this is supposed to be improved patient care. But the focus > is on increasing the number of operating cases for surgeons - not on > improving patient access to competent emergency surgeons. Again - surgeons > want to do more operating (and more billing) but less care. Further, the > older surgeon will withdraw from the on-call rota, have minimal elective > practice, fall into management and simply not be around to educate > residents > and support junior colleagues. > > The patient of the future may see, in turn, ED physician - Surgical > technician - Critical care / Internal medicine. Replace the surgeon with > an > interventional radiologist and you have the end of trauma surgery. > > Karim > > ___________________________________________________ > Karim Brohi FRCS FRCA > Consultant Trauma, Vascular & Critical Care Surgeon, > The Royal London Hospital > Specialty Tutor in Trauma & Emergency Surgery, > The Royal College of Surgeons of England > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html > > > > E. Edhayan M.D., FACS > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Next message: Subacute Care Surgery (was trauma activation and stratification)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
