Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
oded private tangentcarrot at hotmail.comMon Nov 6 19:12:08 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The pateint didn't seem to be a violent guy at all. I can't know that for sure becuase of the condition he was in, but he's brother, who later drove us to the hospital, seemed like a very reasonable, responsible and setteled guy, and I do beleive "it all stays in the family". Morever, what i did understand that happened was that he was struck trying to relax the altercation, and was not at all physically invovlved in it. What I am saying is, that he wouldn't physically resist treatment himself, but the "geurillas" might have done it "for him". The police are called here for any report of a fight as well, but since the guy who called the EMS was the head of security, he simply didn't notife them it was a fight. When I called the EMS, it was before I had been told it was the case. I think that the invovlvment of authority figures (parents, bosses, etc.) in PHTLS is a whole chapter for a discussion. >From: Krin135 at aol.com >Reply-To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" ><trauma-list at trauma.org> >To: trauma-list at trauma.org >Subject: Re: Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up; >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:43:50 EST > >In a message dated 11/6/2006 2:33:56 AM Central Standard Time, >tangentcarrot at hotmail.com writes: > > >One point to be cleared- it did not happen in the US, but in Israel. > >About law enforcment officers- none were at the scene, since the weren't >activated. The night club owner probably did not want "any trouble", and >the >EMS were not acknowledged that it was the consequence of a fight. >You wrote- > >"since when does a 3rd party (employer or not) get to make ANY decisions >" > >Since he's the head of security of the night club. Arguing too much with >him >wouldn't have fallen right with the principle of "safety first" we embrace >in pre-hospital acute treatment :) >And being serious- I'm sure that it wouldn't have been at the best intrest >of the pateint to start arguing with the boss, since i'd be kicked out and >the pateint left alone with out a professional. > >About the possibility of intoxicication- it is very unlikely. The guy >works >at the club and gets his drinks from a bar tender he knows and works with. >Moreover, they do everything they can so the club stays drug free, and as >a >veteran commer to the club, i've never encountered drugs there. According >to freinds, he had one drink all night long, which makes him even >competent >to drive. > >And a thought- if the pateint does not know what happen to him, becuase of >the amnesia, how deeply does it imapct his ability to refuse? He does not >fully understand his condition, does he? > > > > >Item the first: I'm not sure about Israel, but here in the US, the Head of >Security in a situation like that should have been the first one urging the >chap with the problem to go to the hospital, as the *Club* could be held >liable >if the chap really did have a serious problem. This is even more true if >the >patient was an employee of the club. It would have looked even worse for >the >head of security and the club if they had kicked you out for trying to help >the patient and the patient had later died...such things can result in >negligent manslaughter charges being filed here in the states. > >Also, in many areas of the US, a call for a possible altercation >automatically results in a police response, for crowd control if nothing >else. > >As far as the amnesia causing problems with his refusal, again, it depends. >The main problem remains that the patient is still 'walking, talking and >potty > trained,' and capable of forcibly resisting physical attempts to bring >him >to the ED. Lacking training in safe take down techniques (usually provided >by >the law enforcement folks), I'm not sure that I'd want my medics trying to >bring him in, especially if the Club management is resisting the >situation. > >Documentation of good faith efforts on the part of the responding EMS >folks, >as well as coordination with on line medical control (and hopefully, >documentation on the part of the doc at the other end of the radio) will go >a long >way to providing recourse if the situation does go south....but there is >little that I can see to be done for the patient in the situation you are >describing. > >ck >Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP > > > > > >-- >trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
- Previous message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
