Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
Krin135 at aol.com Krin135 at aol.comMon Nov 6 13:43:50 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Transfer to neurosurgical center
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message dated 11/6/2006 2:33:56 AM Central Standard Time, tangentcarrot at hotmail.com writes: One point to be cleared- it did not happen in the US, but in Israel. About law enforcment officers- none were at the scene, since the weren't activated. The night club owner probably did not want "any trouble", and the EMS were not acknowledged that it was the consequence of a fight. You wrote- >"since when does a 3rd party (employer or not) get to make ANY decisions " Since he's the head of security of the night club. Arguing too much with him wouldn't have fallen right with the principle of "safety first" we embrace in pre-hospital acute treatment :) And being serious- I'm sure that it wouldn't have been at the best intrest of the pateint to start arguing with the boss, since i'd be kicked out and the pateint left alone with out a professional. About the possibility of intoxicication- it is very unlikely. The guy works at the club and gets his drinks from a bar tender he knows and works with. Moreover, they do everything they can so the club stays drug free, and as a veteran commer to the club, i've never encountered drugs there. According to freinds, he had one drink all night long, which makes him even competent to drive. And a thought- if the pateint does not know what happen to him, becuase of the amnesia, how deeply does it imapct his ability to refuse? He does not fully understand his condition, does he? Item the first: I'm not sure about Israel, but here in the US, the Head of Security in a situation like that should have been the first one urging the chap with the problem to go to the hospital, as the *Club* could be held liable if the chap really did have a serious problem. This is even more true if the patient was an employee of the club. It would have looked even worse for the head of security and the club if they had kicked you out for trying to help the patient and the patient had later died...such things can result in negligent manslaughter charges being filed here in the states. Also, in many areas of the US, a call for a possible altercation automatically results in a police response, for crowd control if nothing else. As far as the amnesia causing problems with his refusal, again, it depends. The main problem remains that the patient is still 'walking, talking and potty trained,' and capable of forcibly resisting physical attempts to bring him to the ED. Lacking training in safe take down techniques (usually provided by the law enforcement folks), I'm not sure that I'd want my medics trying to bring him in, especially if the Club management is resisting the situation. Documentation of good faith efforts on the part of the responding EMS folks, as well as coordination with on line medical control (and hopefully, documentation on the part of the doc at the other end of the radio) will go a long way to providing recourse if the situation does go south....but there is little that I can see to be done for the patient in the situation you are describing. ck Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP
- Previous message: Transfer to neurosurgical center
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility follow-up;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
