Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
Ronald Gross rgross at harthosp.orgSun Nov 5 22:26:36 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Doug, I know what you are saying - but then again, we are NOT shrinks. That gives us the advantage of being fairly sane, which gives us the ability to use our best judgement. And THAT gives us the ability to see that a patient with this history cannot, under any stretch of the imagination, be considered capable of mentating to the point of compentency for the purpose of deciding what is in his best interest at this time. Short story - transport regardless of what the patient says, and worry about the consequenses later. Rest assured that if he died 'cause he herniated, your butt would be there for all to chew on. So, as I see it, I would be happy to have some dumb-ass lawyer try to accuse me of kidnapping or assault. At least I could look at myself in the mirror each morning and know that I did the right thing. Ron >>> "Doug Condit Jr" <thoracicsurgpa at msn.com> 11/05/06 4:30 PM >>>
- Previous message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
