Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
Krin135 at aol.com Krin135 at aol.comSat Nov 4 21:14:15 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Transfer to neurosurgical center
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message dated 11/4/2006 1:05:47 PM Central Standard Time, tangentcarrot at hotmail.com writes: The first dillema is- should EMS personnel (EMT-B'S, in this case) insist with such pateints? I tried conviencing them to "talk some sense" into him, but they refused,despite my description of coma and amnesia, saying they couldn't force him and that "he looks fine now", and left the scene. Problem being that he's now upright and relatively coherent...while he is displaying the classic 'lucid interval' that may presage an expanding epidural bleed, there's nothing that you can do for him right now... Once he passes out, at least here in the US and Canada, 'implied consent' becomes possible, and further treatment can be rendered. ck Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP
- Previous message: Transfer to neurosurgical center
- Next message: Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
