Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog??
Geehan, Douglas geehand at umkc.eduThu Jan 12 13:48:15 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog??
- Next message: Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Caesar, Did the paper really say omiting the DRE saves time?? We are perhaps confusing statistical significance with clinical significance. Why do you consider a rectal exam to be "cruel and unusual"?? Are we interested in saving time or taking care of patients? Now "routine" DRE may be needed to be reassessed, but for patients with potential spinal cord injury or patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, the DRE does provide useful information. As a tangent, many of our trauma patients do not have the most stellar record for having primary care physicians. In the appropriate age groups, a full physical exam is, in fact, indicated as a general health care issue unrelated to the original trauma. Regards, Doug Douglas Geehan, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Surgery University of Missouri-Kansas City geehand at umkc.edu ________________________________ From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org on behalf of Caesar Ursic Sent: Wed 1/11/2006 10:11 AM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog?? Yet another paper refuting the utility of the routine digital rectal exam as part of the Trauma Secondary Survey: Esposito, TJ, Ingraham, A, Luchette, FA, et al. Reasons to Omit Digital Rectal Exam in Trauma Patients: No Fingers, No Rectum, No Useful Additional Information. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care: Volume 59(6) December 2005 pp 1314-1319). "DRE rarely provides additional accurate or useful information that changes management. Omission of DRE in virtually all trauma patients appears permissible, safe, and advantageous. Elimination of routine DRE from the secondary survey will presumably conserve time and resources, minimize unpleasant encounters, and protect patients and staff from the potential for further harm without any significant negative impact on care and outcome." (excerpt from the paper) Is it time to abandon this cruel and unusual practice once and for all? CM Ursic, MD -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 5621 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://list.mistral.net/pipermail/trauma-list/attachments/20060112/ea9e45b6/attachment.bin
- Previous message: Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog??
- Next message: Trauma Rectal Exam: back to analog??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
