Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
FDA Panel Votes Against Blood-Substitute Study
S Schecter schecters at gmail.comFri Dec 15 13:15:39 GMT 2006
- Previous message: Highly Irritable Head Injury Patient
- Next message: was FDA is now the companies take on the decision
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
FDA Panel Votes Against Blood-Substitute Study Despite Push From Navy, Test of Biopure's Treatment Fails to Win Endorsement By *ZACHARY M. SEWARD* and *THOMAS M. BURTON* December 15, 2006; Page B2 Bucking heavy pressure from the U.S. Navy, a federal advisory panel recommended against carrying out a controversial study of Biopure Corp.'s blood substitute. The treatment carries significant safety risks and often would have been administered to human trauma victims without their consent. The Food and Drug Administration usually follows advisory panels' advice, but it doesn't have to. The decision on testing Hemopure is vital for its developer, Biopure<http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=BPUR>Corp., of Cambridge, Mass. Hemopure currently is only approved for limited human use in South Africa. The panel vote was 11 against, eight in favor and one abstention. Biopure's chairman and chief executive, Zafiris G. Zafirelis, declined to comment on the outcome immediately following the meeting. "I need to digest the comments," he said. Hemopure is controversial because it has been consistently linked to serious complications in earlier studies, documents show. Nevertheless, the Navy, whose medics treat wounded Marines in battle zones, contends that Hemopure may lower the death rate among severely injured trauma patients by possibly 15% from what it believes will be about a 58% death rate among patients getting standard therapy. Saline solution, the standard therapy administered in the ambulance, merely raises blood pressure, while Hemopure is an oxygen-carrying resuscitative fluid that can be carried onto the battlefield and doesn't require matching blood types, as would real human blood. John Mateczun, the Navy's deputy surgeon general, told the committee that 90% of military trauma fatalities occur before the soldier reaches "hospital-level care," where they could receive real human blood. "In terms of benefit, we believe that many lives might be saved in Operation Iraqi Freedom with this capability," Dr. Mateczun said, referring to Hemopure. "It would be worth our efforts if it saved only one life." Among those addressing the panel in Silver Spring, Md., was Sgt. Eddie Wright, who was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade outside of Fallujah, Iraq, in 2004. He said he was willing to accept "a slight risk to my health" for the benefits of Hemopure in combat. "Any risks that I've been hearing today are not applicable to my situation," Sgt. Wright said. Some committee members expressed skepticism that results from any trial among citizens in the U.S. could be applied to the use of Hemopure during war. They also questioned whether the potential benefits to the military in combat should be weighed in considering a stateside study. [image: [chart]] The FDA had sought to hold the Biopure/Navy hearing behind closed doors in July. After The Wall Street Journal wrote about the issue of the planned closed hearings, the consumer group Public Citizen brought a lawsuit and the FDA rescheduled yesterday's hearing as a public one. Hemopure has shown an elevated level of medical "serious adverse events" in a large study of the blood substitute in orthopedic-surgery patients, 353 of whom got Hemopure and 340 of whom received donor blood. Government documents show the Hemopure patients had 25 deaths, versus 14 in the blood group; 54 cases of heart failure and fluid overload, compared with 22 who got blood; and 14 heart attacks, against four in the donated-blood population. The same sorts of imbalances arose when Hemopure was compared with other resuscitative fluids, including saline solution, in other surgical studies. The FDA's reviewer on the proposed Navy/Biopure study, Laurence Landow, has consistently opposed the Navy's plans. Dr. Landow has declined to comment on the issue. The FDA has acted with apparent inconsistency on the blood-substitute issue, blocking the Navy study while allowing a competing trauma study by Biopure competitor Northfield Laboratories<http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=NFLD>Inc. to proceed. The Northfield trial finished enrolling patients this summer. Northfield is expected to release some results this month. The importance of Hemopure to Biopure was underscored as the company released financial results for the year ended Oct. 31. It said that it expects its independent accountants to include a "going concern" warning in its annual report because Biopure said it has only enough money to survive through August and needs to raise additional funds even though it just completed an offering of stock and warrants that raised $16.6 million. For the fourth quarter, Biopure reported a net loss of $6.3 million, or 13 cents a share, narrowed from a year-earlier net loss of $8.2 million, or 34 cents a share. Revenue rose to $431,000 from $328,000. Biopure shares fell four cents to 59 cents in 4 p.m. Nasdaq Stock Market composite trading.
- Previous message: Highly Irritable Head Injury Patient
- Next message: was FDA is now the companies take on the decision
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
