The case against tourniquets

• Previous message: The case against tourniquets
• Next message: The case against tourniquets
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

the military edition or the regular?


>From: "James Richardson" <jimmnn at comcast.net>
>Reply-To: "Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list" 
><trauma-list at trauma.org>
>To: "'Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list'" <trauma-list at trauma.org>
>Subject: RE: The case against tourniquets
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:01:40 -0700
>
>They have been reemphasized in the new PHTLS edition.
>
>  Jim<
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org 
>[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]
>On Behalf Of Karim Brohi
>Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:55 AM
>To: trauma-list at trauma.org
>Subject: The case against tourniquets
>
>Recently, the US and UK military have "rediscovered" tourniquets.  Their 
>use
>has been published in meetings around the world and is now spreading to
>civilian practice.  ATLS and other groups have spent years campaigning to
>remove tourniquets from civilian practice, for good reasons, and now they
>are back - with not a shred of evidence to support this reversion.
>
>
>
>
>--
>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
>To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
>http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

• Previous message: The case against tourniquets
• Next message: The case against tourniquets
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]