Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
pre-hospital C-section
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgMon Aug 28 20:13:04 BST 2006
- Previous message: pre-hospital C-section
- Next message: pre-hospital C-section
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
And David, lest it go unsaid, there are egomaniacs in every field, both yours and mine. And by the way, I AM a flight doc! >>> David Sullivan <fpcems at yahoo.com> 8/28/2006 2:28 PM >>> Ron, Im going to make an assumption here, that you are a MD that works in a hospital all day long. Our job and your job have differences that we cannot ignore and we (as an EMS system) need each other to survive. I certainly do not stroke my ego, by landing a tough ETT ect..., and in fact I am highly insulted that you would think that about some the providers that provide ALS care are egomanics that are out there like cowboys with needles. Our job isnt easy in the least bit; when was the last time that you rescued a teenager from an MVA, delieved a baby stuck in traffic, not that Im trying to start a pissing contest here, but to infer that "street medics" have an ego problem has "no merit" we have a scope of practice, and protocols, and they are there for the pre-hospital provider to operate between, but in this instance, at least in my state, there is no protocol to refer too. After posting this topic i agree that this procedure has little merit and rarely successful, but if the mother is already in traumatic arrest, what are we harming? A great football coach said once, "with great risks comes great reward" I certianly wouldnt do anything to make me feel better, but I feel in these types of cases, there should be something that can be done, other than extrication and transport Any flight docs out there with an opinion on this topic? or to field amputation and indications? Ronald Gross <Rgross at harthosp.org> wrote: Anthony, Your/our job is to treat the patient, NOT our egos by doing something that is (1) of no merit, and (2) assured to fail. In short, we are to alleviate pain and suffering and DO NO FURTHER HARM! What worries me is your statement: "So when it comes to staying within the scope of practice I'm all for it. I have gone above and beyond what my job calls for to do the right thing for my patients, at times." Exactly how do you want it? Scope of practice is scope of practice, and that predetermined scope of practice is not for you or me or anyone else to change on a whim or because our ego or emotion tells us that we want to do something else to make us feel better. In-field C-section? Give me a break. Please refer back to Dr. Mattox's comments for some reality testing. Ron >>> "Anthony Caruso" 8/28/2006 1:35 PM >>> Ouch! Well Dave, I totally agree with you. Yes they have a less then one percent of chance in living and yes were here to help them. The line has to be drawn somewhere though. I like to think of myself as a medic that would do that cardioversion that some medic's "feels uncomfortable". So when it comes to staying within the scope of practice I'm all for it. I have gone above and beyond what my job calls for to do the right thing for my patients, at times. I could understand if we did attend rounds with the L&D physicians and had further training and testing. (like an R.S.I project, retavaise waiver) Then I'm all for it. To give that little life a chance of survival. (by the way I'm expecting my 1st baby in November) So having said this and wanting the best care possible for my patients I would rather walk away from a situation saying to myself the injuries were just to severe for her to survive. Than not having a job in the end! Oh, and by the way will till "docrickfry" hears about this one. Lets just say he's been a staunch opponent of some of my ideas with other subjects. Sincerely, Anthony M. Caruso NREMT-P Town Of Natick Fire Department, Natick, Massachusetts. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Parrish, Richard Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:06 PM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: pre-hospital C-section A Jersey City NJ Medic did this a few years ago. Medical control gave the go ahead and talked the medic through the process. The MD was censured and the Medic lost his certificate. NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential health information that is protected by special federal or state law or regulation. It is intended only for the use of the individual to whom it has been addressed. Only the person named in this transmission is authorized to view any information contained herein. Re-disclosure without proper consent is prohibited. Unauthorized use or disclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to penalties under both federal and state law. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: pre-hospital C-section
- Next message: pre-hospital C-section
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
