Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
pre-hospital C-section
David Sullivan fpcems at yahoo.comMon Aug 28 17:29:09 BST 2006
- Previous message: pre-hospital C-section
- Next message: pre-hospital C-section
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anthony, Its nice to see another jake from MA on here, and I thought I was the only one...I did hear about those medics from NJ that did it, i too am unsure of there result. I personally wouldnt know what to do, if the mother has injuries incompatiable with life, isnt our job to preserve life? so why not think about giving the fetus at least a chance, I understand that most of these cases arent going to have a good ending, but just for arguments sake, we work traumatic arrests..even though they statisically have less than 1% chance of survival? Why not give a unborn fetus a chance? Just food for thought. Im not sure what I would actually do, I think that I would just scoop and screw...and then call CISD....landscaping is a good side job....or the trucking company that Goose is working for "truckmasters" David Sullivan BA NREMT-P Anthony Caruso <Medic541 at hotmail.com> wrote: Morning all. Dave, this is truly a touchy subject. I too being a paramedic/firefighter have spoken about this with other fellow paramedics. Yes, the State of N.J did impose sanctions agents the two medics that preformed the emergent C-section! From what I understand that the 2 medics were in constant contact with on-line medical control (OLMC) to guide them through the procedure. So even with the(OLMC)they were still in trouble with the state. However, I'm not aware of the outcome if they were reinstated there certificates or not. I have to agree with Pret "do you have back-up employment?" This is one of the hypothetic cases where if it has happened ("it wasnt us that put them there") and ("we did all we could") As a medic for 6 years to me something like that isn't worth jeopardizing my family, my home, my career and my reputation. There is a reason why OB/GYN physicians pay 160,000 a year for liability insurance! Good luck and let me know what happens. Sincerely, Anthony M. Caruso NREMT-P Town Of Natick Fire Department, Natick, Massachusetts. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Walter.Mauritz at auva.at Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 8:30 AM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: RE: pre-hospital C-section Pret, what you wrote seems logical, but there is some evidence that perimortem caesarean delivery might be an option in at least in some cases of maternal cardiac arrest: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun; 192(6):1916-20; discussion 1920-1. Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct? Katz V, Balderston K, DeFreest M. Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Eugene, 97401, USA. vkatz at peacehealth.org OBJECTIVE: The recommendation to perform a perimortem cesarean delivery within 4 minutes of maternal cardiac arrest was introduced in 1986. This recommendation was based on the assumptions that cardiopulmonary resuscitation is ineffective in the third trimester because of aortocaval compression, and that fetal and perhaps maternal outcomes would be optimized by timely delivery. Our objective was to review the outcomes of perimortem cesarean deliveries to attempt to validate those assumptions. STUDY DESIGN: Ovid MEDLINE searches using maternal mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, perimortem cesarean delivery, heart attack, and cardiac arrest from 1985 until 2004. Citations from bibliographies of identified publications were perused and cross-referenced for other potential articles. Case reports were included for analysis when mothers had complete cardiopulmonary arrest, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation had been initiated before cesarean delivery. RESULTS: There were 38 cases of perimortem cesarean delivery identified; 34 infants survived (3 sets of twins, 1 set of triplets); 4 other infants survived initially, but died several days after the deliveries from complications of prematurity and anoxia. Of the 34 infants (25-42 weeks' gestation), time of delivery after maternal cardiac arrest was available for 25. Eleven infants were delivered within 5 minutes, 4 were delivered from 6 to 10 minutes, 2 were delivered from 11 to 15 minutes, and 7 were delivered more than 15 minutes. Of 20 perimortem cesarean deliveries with potentially resuscitatable causes, 13 mothers were resuscitated and discharged from the hospital in good condition. One other mother was successfully resuscitated after the delivery, but died within 24 hours from complications related to her amniotic fluid embolism. In 12 of 18 reports that documented hemodynamic status, cesarean delivery preceded return of maternal pulse and blood pressure, often in a dramatic fashion. Eight other cases noted improvement in maternal status. Importantly, in no case was there deterioration of the maternal condition with the cesarean delivery. We wish to emphasize the large selection bias in this data. CONCLUSION: Published reports from 20 years support, but fall far from proving, that perimortem cesarean delivery within 4 minutes of maternal cardiac arrest improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. PMID: 15970850 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] I do not have access to that journal, and I have not read the full article. Thus, I don't know whether there were any trauma-related cases of maternal cardiac arrest (which I doubt). Still, this case series (the only one I found on medline) shows that perimortem caesarean delivery may be an option in some cases of maternal cardiac arrest (but very probably not in traumatic cardiac arrest). Walter Mauritz MD PhD Professor of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Trauma Hospital "Lorenz Boehler" A - 1200 Vienna, AUSTRIA, EU phone: ++43 1 33110 789 fax: ++43 1 33110 277 e-mail: walter.mauritz at auva.at -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn, Pret Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:15 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: pre-hospital C-section The gravid uterus is the first organ sacrificed in the shock response cascade. By the time mom is symptomatic, the fetus has been abandoned by her struggle for homeostasis: God and/or Darwin would rather she live to rejoin the herd than die for the sake of her unborn child. All of which suggests that with regard to perimortem C-section, the mess-to-success ratio is stultifying. Where mom is undeniably dead, you can at least claim to be doing no (physical) harm; but then you're stuck for an indication to justify her evisceration. In all other cases, a proper retrospective review may rightly contend that you were treating the wrong patient without proper training or direction. What kind of back-up employment do you have? The goals are earnest and admirable, but nonetheless delusional. Focus on mom's vital signs, make for a trauma center, and prepare for disappointment. Sorry. Heroic motives are no substitute for critical thinking. Pret Bjorn, RN Bangor, ME USA -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of David Sullivan Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:18 PM To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list Subject: pre-hospital C-section Hello List, I was sittting around the fire station at work, and one of my co-workers brought up an argument that we all had differing opinions on. Is there any reading out there about the pre-hospital c-section on a pregnant female that has injuries incompatable with life? ie decapitation, major trauma ect..has anyone on this list ever run into a situation like that or similar. i do this is far fetched, but it must have happened somewhere? dave sullivan BA NREMT-P --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
- Previous message: pre-hospital C-section
- Next message: pre-hospital C-section
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
