Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Alcohol Screening (revisited) and HIPAA
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgSun Aug 20 05:16:36 BST 2006
- Previous message: Alcohol Screening (revisited) and HIPAA
- Next message: Alcohol Screening (revisited)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
22 years!!! Cool, Dude! Then you know exactly what I/we am talking about. We are talking about (1) screening for substance abuse that DOES get a social service consult every single time and (2) treatment, and yes that applies to every single trauma patient that I/we care for where I come from. Ron >>> <statman2500 at aol.com> 8/19/2006 11:25 PM >>> Well dude.....the discussion centered around the appropriateness of blanket BALs being drawn. The discussion did not involve DTs, however if you believe that you must pull something out of the hat go for it. So does this mean that you hold all patients with elevated BALs to screen for DTs? Of course not. Trauma in itself is not a clinical indicator for ETOH and tox screens. Since you made the decision to assume, we all know what that means. With 22 years of ER experience, I believe I might have seen one or two patients with greater than 400 BALs. -----Original Message----- From: rgross at harthosp.org To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 7:08 AM Subject: Re: Alcohol Screening (revisited) and HIPAA Dude, I am going to assume that you have never cared for a patient that sits there and carries on a conversation with you - and your ETOH is 0.0 and his is >400!!! Those are the ones that DT when they hit 250, and when you hit 250 you're comatose and drooling on the couch!! GIve me a break. ETOH and tox screens ARE clinically indicated. The only fraud perpetrated is when we fail to care for the patient as best as we can and then bill for the care! Ron >>> <statman2500 at aol.com> 08/19/06 12:08 AM >>> Why do members of trauma teams continue to add to the futile list of unnecessary labs on so called trauma panels? Certainly if a test is indicated, it should be done. However, collecting a BAL on an alert, oriented, appropriate pt with no clinical indicators ranks right up there with CBCs on MVA patients complaining of ankle pain. Priceless...no, Useless...yes. What do you do if a pt has a BAL of .09 and wants to leave AMA? In Texas a BAL of .08 is neeeded for DWI. But guess what, the patient is not driving home if they totaled their car on the freeway. It's illegal for them to drive, not walk. Certainly it is preferable to release the pt to a family member. There is not a law in the nation that allows a physician or nurse to restrain a patient based on their BAL level. Another issue of a blanket policy advocating BALs on trauma patient involves billing fraud. Ordering and billing for a laboratory test that is not clinically indicated or have a diagnostic value may constitute fraud. And not trying to throw stones but you stood up in the middle of the firing range. Since when (and why) does a clinical nurse have access to resolution of patient billing (CAN WE SAY HIPPA VIOLATION) that is resolved usually weeks after the patient is discharged. Billing is the responsibility of the business office, not the ER registration clerks. -----Original Message----- From: bensonblues at comcast.net To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 7:05 PM Subject: Alcohol Screening (revisited) Drug and alcohol abuse and trauma are very closely linked. If folks in Detroit would drink responsible and stop using crack cocaine, from my estimate, the trauma case list would be reduced to little old ladies with fractured hips (and occasionally these girls have had a nip of brandy prior to their fall). I am not opposed to mandatory screening in trauma patients (Level I, II, or III), but the question remains: What to do with the data, other than use it for medical care. In terms of intervention, we don't have the resources. I suspect that the only coucelling they get is from me, telling them that they might want to rethink their vises and behavior - as the surgical team takes them off to the OR. They are seen by Social Work postop (who are over-worked, understaffed, and underpaid), but the best that the law allows (unless they are being charged with a crime) in terms of intervention is referral to outpatient services - which will usually only see them if they have insurance. I recall a study done in Baltimore many years ago. They screened trauma victims for EtOH and drugs of abuse and found (as I recall): a majority of victims had EtOH and another substance on board, followed by EtOH only, followed by nothing, followed by marijuanna. In other words, in terms of being a trauma victim, you were more likely to be a victim if you were straight than if you smoked pot. Obviously, we don't encourage our patients to toke down as a way of avoiding becoming a trauma victim. But, this illistrated the problems interpreting data obtained by dredging patient records. DB -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: Alcohol Screening (revisited) and HIPAA
- Next message: Alcohol Screening (revisited)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
