Login
Site Search
Subscribe

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify

Modify

Home > List Archives

Anesthesia and Trauma

Ronald Gross rgross at harthosp.org
Sat Aug 19 13:16:44 BST 2006


E,
Where I was before coming to Hartford, anesthesia responded to all Full
Trauma Activations, and when the patient went to the OR he/she went to
the OR, NOT to holding!
Now, here at HH we have a bunch of ED docs that teach a good airway
course, and an EM residency.  The airway is managed by the ED attending
and an EM PG-3.  The caveat is a simple one, however - the call is that
of the Trauma Attending as to who is really going to manage the airway. 
If the trauma doc wants anesthesia - for whatever reason -  he/she pages
them STAT and they show up STAT.
Personally, I think it best that anesthesia respond to ALL Full Trauma
Codes, and that all patients needing the OR go to the OR, not to
holding.
Ron

>>> "Errington Thompson" <errington at erringtonthompson.com> 08/19/06
5:30 AM >>>
Ok, help me with this one.  When a Code Trauma (highest level of
activation)
is called should anesthesia be a part of the team?  Once the patient
is
evaluated and if found to need to go to the OR urgently should the
patient
be taken to anesthesia holding.  If so how long in holding is too
long?

The bottom-line to all of my questions is the role of anesthesia in
the
trauma service.
	 
thanks, 

Errington C. Thompson, MD, FACS, FCCM
Trauma/Surgical Critical Care
Mission Hospital
Asheville, NC
Author - A Letter to America
www.whereistheoutrage.net 

 
Everyone deserves to make an informed decision
                                - Errington Thompson, MD


-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] 
On Behalf Of Ronald Gross
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:58 PM
To: trauma-list at trauma.org 
Subject: Re: Alcohol Screening

"We need to worry less about the insurance response, and more about
injury prevention and address the risk taking behaviors of these
drivers!"

Thank you, Laura.......I couldn't have said it better!

Ron

>>> "LAURA STEPHENS" <LSTEPH at parknet.pmh.org> 08/17/06 3:03 PM >>>
Working in a level one trauma center, I have often drawn both legal
blood alcohol levels, as well as diagnostic BAC's.  The legal blood
alcohol levels were always drawn, and placed in blood tubes provided
by
the officer, after obtaining consent  from the patient.  Betadine was
used in place of alcohol, as to not affect the results, and careful
documentation was completed for the chain of custody,  to include
which
officer took posession of the tube, and badge number.  It was also
clearly documented that betadine was was used in lieu of alcohol, and
allowed to air dry before the venipuncture was completed.  This was to
allow for better prosecution of the case.  When it came to blood
alcohol
levels drawn as part of the trauma lab panel, it was not treated as
carefully as legal blood alcohol's were.  Alcohol pads were and are
routinely used to draw labs, which are generally drawn at the same
time
the IV was placed.   We routinely send BAC's and urine tox on all
trauma
patients, to identify those with potential alcohol or drug  related
problems.  You cannot address problems, unless you know they exist,
and
even though there may be enough  non-laboratory evidence of alcohol
intoxication, i.e. smell,  or self report,  that without hard evidence
the patient may not be willing to discuss or admit to  the alcohol
related trauma.  In the 8 1/2 years I have worked in this trauma
center,
I can only recall 2-3 payment denials due to positive testing of ETOH.

We need to worry less about the insurance response, and more about
injury prevention and address the risk taking behaviors of these
drivers!  I applaud the ACS mandate, and I think the medical community
should embrace this mandate, and put in place  interventions and
injury
prevention programs, so maybe we will have fewer alcohol related
traumas.

LStephens, RN, CEN
Dallas, TX

>>> bryanboling at gmail.com 8/17/06 9:47 AM >>>
When I was a tech in the ED, we used to draw tubes for the police. 
However,
they were ADDITIONAL tubes drawn for the purpose of evidence
collection,
not
our regular labs, and it was with the patient's "consent."  I put
consent in
quotes because we have an implied consent law here that says if a
police
officer suscpects someone of driving under the influence, he can
request
they give a blood/breath/urine sample (most times they get the choice
-
breath is free, blood or urine they MIGHT have to pay for - but if
they're
in the ED for treatment, blood test is free too, and dependending on
the
nature and injuries, might be the "required" way, but I digress...). 
They
can refuse, but refusal gets their license suspended.  So, I never ahd
a
patient refuse when it was put to them like that.

We drew the labs into special tubes with the officer observing and
then
had
to sign a form saying we'd drawn it from the right patient and the
tubes
were covered (sealed I suppose) with a label that the officer had to
cosign
with us.  I suppose that prevents tampering down the line?  Then they
took
the tubes to some other lab they didn't go to the hospital lab.

We routinely drew BALs on trauma patients and typically ran a urine
drug
screen if there was any indication they might have anything on board. 
But
this was simply to know what we were dealing with pharmacologically
(and
the
occasional ED game "guess the BAL") and not for any kind of legal
proceeding.

bryan


On 8/17/06, Lorick Fox, PA-C <lorick at lorick.org> wrote:
>
>
> Since there is no chain of custody, I would be surprised if a blood
> alcohol
> obtained in the hospital was admissible for criminal prosecution.
> On the other hand, I have heard of police officers watching blood
tubes
> drawn and then seizing them as evidence.
>
> Anyone actually KNOW:
> (1) if hospital labs are admissible and
> (2) if the "seizure of blood tubes" is anything more than urban
legend?
>
> BTW, I am leaving Egypt next month to join Cardiovascular
Associates,
LLC
> in
> the Norfolk, Virginia area www.cval.org (doing EP).  However, I will
be
> returning to volunteer EMS as well, so I'll actually see more
trauma.
>
> Lorick Fox, MPAS, PA-C
> SEAVIN Medical
> Gianaclis Support Complex
> 011-20-3-448-2335x2001 or 2207
> www.Lorick.org 
>
>
>
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 
>
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 



                                        

--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 


--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html


                                        



More information about the trauma-list mailing list