Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous"
docrickfry at aol.com docrickfry at aol.comThu Aug 10 13:07:43 BST 2006
- Previous message: SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous"
- Next message: Hurricane Katrina Research Stamford University
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am not sure what sides are being manufactured here--I also agree with amputation in the absence of meaningful function as I have been saying--just that at this point what function is left is not clear, and may not be evident for awhile. Besides, with the patient not willing to lose the leg, there is not much choice in the matter, is there? ERF -----Original Message----- From: rgross at harthosp.org To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 7:49 PM Subject: Re: SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous" All I can say is that I am keeping awesome company - regardless of which side of the fence one is sitting!! I am sure that you are gonna let us know what happens to this poor fellow......many months down the line. Be well, Ron >>> <kmattox at aol.com> 08/09/06 7:40 PM >>> Ron. As of today he has an obturator bypass from iliac to popliteal. Swollen leg. No major venous out put. I suggested to team the leg is going to be non functional. The pts doctor is convienced the surgeons and rehab can have a good functional result. You and I are on the same side against Frykberg and the patients doctors. K. Sent via BlackBerry, return via KMattox at aol.com -----Original Message----- From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:21:46 To:<trauma-list at trauma.org> Subject: Re: SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous" OK, so now you have me right where you want me. ;-) Again, no pun intended, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that I would still strongly suggest that the limb be amputated; we have heard that there is enough to "ambulate ok". The functional result of "ambulate OK", and what it is going to take to get there - months and months of surgery, eventual addition to pain medications, depression, out of work for months and ever year(s) to attain minimal function (walking) without the ability to return to gainful employment, and lastly the high probability of financial ruin - do not seem to be the right thing to do just to preserve something that will be "OK" to "ambulate". Save as much tissue as possible, swing flaps, look to a (high) AK and get this kid up and moving as soon as possible. Just my 2 cents. Ron >>> <KMATTOX at aol.com> 8/9/2006 7:10 PM >>> In a message dated 8/9/2006 6:07:50 P.M. Central Standard Time, Rgross at harthosp.org writes: I STILL have not heard from Ken exactly what has been left with respect to the gentleman's thigh musculature, and exactly what sort of functional outcome the physiatrists are predicting with best case scenario muscle mass they are going to have to work Enough muscle to work leg. Rehab people think they can work with him to ambulate ok with existing nerves and muscles. k -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
- Previous message: SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous"
- Next message: Hurricane Katrina Research Stamford University
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
