Login
Site Search
Subscribe

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify

Modify

Home > List Archives

trauma-list Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2

C M cmarg28 at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 2 01:11:13 BST 2006


Remove me from this list, you people need to grow up.

trauma-list-request at trauma.org wrote:  Send trauma-list mailing list submissions to
trauma-list at trauma.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.mistral.net/mailman/listinfo/trauma-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
trauma-list-request at trauma.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
trauma-list-owner at trauma.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of trauma-list digest..."
Today's Topics:

1. PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (KMATTOX at aol.com)
2. Re: A Series of Unfortunate Events... (KMATTOX at aol.com)
3. RE: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy (Roy Danks)
4. Help, Network, Florence Italy (KMATTOX at aol.com)
5. RE: Help, Network, Florence Italy (Bob Waddell II)
6. Fwd: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT (KMATTOX at aol.com)
7. Re: Help, Network, Florence Italy (KMATTOX at aol.com)
8. RE: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (Hardcastle, Tim, Dr )
9. Apology (bensonblues at comcast.net)
10. Splenic function after embolization (Joe Nold)
11. MAST/prehospital interventions - for prehospital providers
(Bill Griggs)
12. Re: MAST/prehospital interventions - for prehospital
providers (Ian Seppelt)
13. Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (james9daly at eircom.net)
14. RE: Cease fire NOW or pre hospital needle thoracotomy
(STEWART, Paul)
15. Re: Cease fire NOT (Ronald Gross)
16. Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (Ronald Gross)
17. Fwd: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT (Ronald Gross)
18. Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (Karim Brohi)
19. Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION (Tony Joseph)
From: KMATTOX at aol.com
Subject: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:28:52 EDT
To: trauma-list at trauma.org

Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the 
political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. We the 
majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a wonderful web 
site. 

I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and 
address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice, 
permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT. 

Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes any way 
he wishes. 

DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and 
Trauma-list. 

k

From: KMATTOX at aol.com
Subject: Re: A Series of Unfortunate Events...
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:41:40 EDT
To: trauma-list at trauma.org

Ceasr: I applaud what you did. I am not critical. As you described the 
findings, you procedure was a good judgment and option. You have a 
protective ileostomy. I like your moving slow. Keep up the good work and 
the positive progress notes. 

k

From: "Roy Danks" <roydanks at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:45:39 -0500
To: "Forrest Robleto" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

> Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
> 
> I guess I stand corrected. I got that information from a source I normally
> consider reliable. It sounded reasonable so I believed it.
> 
> Is elevation of the lower extremities useful in hypoperfusion for those of
> us without the ability to introduce fluids?

It ain't about BP, it's all about cellular perfusion and reversing/preventing metabolic acidosis, ie: DO2


Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Mar;23(3):564-7. Links 
Trendelenburg position and oxygen transport in hypovolemic adults.Sing RF, O'Hara D, Sawyer MA, Marino PL. 
Department of Surgery, Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the Trendelenburg position on oxygen transport in hypovolemic patients. DESIGN: A prospective, self-controlled sequential design. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had indwelling pulmonary artery catheters, and hypovolemia was confirmed by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 6 mm Hg or less. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables were measured with the patient supine and again ten minutes after placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care surgical ICU. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Eight postoperative adults. RESULTS: Mean arterial blood pressure increased from 64.9 +/- 4.9 to 75.6 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (P < .05), pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased from 4.6 +/- 1.1 to 7.9 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (P < .05), and the systemic vascular resistance rose to 2,965 +/- 210 from 2,302 +/- 199 dyne.sec/cm5 (P < .05). There was no significant change in cardiac index, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, or oxygen
 extraction ratio. CONCLUSION: The increase in blood pressure from Trendelenburg position is not associated with an improvement in blood flow or tissue oxygenation.



Why can you not introduce fluids? Level of training? Situation? Please explain.

RRD

_________________________________________________________________
Try Live.com - your fast, personalized homepage with all the things you care about in one place.
http://www.live.com/getstarted
From: KMATTOX at aol.com
Subject: Help, Network, Florence Italy
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:56:13 EDT
To: trauma-list at trauma.org

I do hope that this is not out of bounds for this list server. One of the 
real beauties of this list is to have the ability to network world wide. 

The college age son of our Trauma EC Nurse Manager is going to Florence 
Italy for several months soon and would like to just have the name of a physician 
contact, particularly a trauma surgeon. Any advice. 

k

From: "Bob Waddell II" <bobwaddell at bresnan.net>
Subject: RE: Help, Network, Florence Italy
CC: "'giuliana.bruno at l'" <giuliana.bruno at libero.it>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:00:20 -0600
To: "'Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list'" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Contact Giuliana Bruno - she is a trauma surgeon in Turin, but has
significant contacts throughout the entire country. Her contact
information is: giuliana.bruno at libero.it Hope this helps.


Take care,

Bob

Robert K. Waddell II

Vice President - Emergency Preparedness and Response

"The Sacco Triage Methodology"

307 920 2020 (c)

bobwaddell at bresnan.net

www.sharpthinkers.com


-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 8:56 PM
To: trauma-list at trauma.org
Subject: Help, Network, Florence Italy

I do hope that this is not out of bounds for this list server. One
of the 
real beauties of this list is to have the ability to network world
wide. 

The college age son of our Trauma EC Nurse Manager is going to Florence

Italy for several months soon and would like to just have the name of a
physician 
contact, particularly a trauma surgeon. Any advice. 

k
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html



From: KMATTOX at aol.com
Subject: Fwd: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:12:58 EDT
To: trauma-list at trauma.org


From: "Brian Shapiro" <siddsidd at comcast.net>
To: <KMATTOX at aol.com>
Subject: Re: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:11:14 -0400

        I think there is little reason to perform an appendectomy in the middle of the night. I perform most appendectomies laprascopically as an outpatient the next morning (if I get the consult after about 9pm), 6am is a great time to do an appendix.I start antibiotics once diagnosis is made. For the last several months I have been using the 36 hour rule (see last reference) declaring an emergency when that time is approached (day or night).  Now I am on call at least every other night (for the last 13 years without residents). I think the literature supports this approach. CT scanning has decreased negative appendectomy rate (at my hospital from almost 20% to 5%).
   
   
  1. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Dec;40(12):1912-5.   
   Emergent vs urgent appendectomy in children: a study of outcomes.
   
   
  2.: World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
   
   
             J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):401-6. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
                   How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis
   
   
   
   
  Brian Shapiro MD FACS
Trauma Director
  Chief of Surgery
Genesys Health System
Grand Blanc Michigan
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: KMATTOX at aol.com 
  To: kirkmahon at hotmail.com ; ccm-l at ccm-l.org 
  Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 10:22 PM
  Subject: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT
  

    In a message dated 7/31/2006 5:11:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, kirkmahon at hotmail.com writes:
  Otherwise, they ALL get CT.  It is an innordinate 
drain on ER resources. Frankly, I feel it is often a maneuver to avoid 
coming in to examine the patient until the last possible moment.  I would 
love Dr. Mattox to train more of the guys/gals from the Tub to actually 
practice that way in real life (sans CT dependency.)

Ex Baylor Med Student and Grad from the Tub.....practicing in Dallas, TX,

  
  I fear, I really do fear that the request for the CT scan by surgeons in patients with suspected appendicitis is a temporizing move to get more tests during the night, so they dont have to come into the hospital to operate until daylight hours giving the appendix a greater chance to rupture, due to physician (surgeon) delay.      Even in the current days of some physicians at the Ben Taub General Hospital (county hospital in Houston), some persons, and yes even at times some of our junior surgical residents who have recently rotated in the private hospital order CT scans.     The attitude adjustment capabilities of our educational offerings in the M&M conference are not the same reinforcement and discipline producing as former years.     
   
  k 
From: KMATTOX at aol.com
Subject: Re: Help, Network, Florence Italy
CC: giuliana.bruno at libero.it
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:13:47 EDT
To: trauma-list at trauma.org

Bob, thank you so very very much

This is a wonderful list with even better members

k

From: "Hardcastle, Tim, Dr <tch at sun.ac.za>" <tch at sun.ac.za>
Subject: RE: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:43:27 +0200
To: "Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Ken

As per the suggestion: SECONDED! (I'm sure Tony Joseph from Down Under would agree - he suggested this last week already!)

Tim
Dr T C Hardcastle
M.B.,Ch.B.(Stell); M.Med(Chir); FCS(SA)
Senior Surgeon / Senior Lecturer: Surgery (Trauma and ICU)
ATLS instructor and DSTC Cape Town Course Director
Intern program Coordinator: Surgery
Program Manager: Emergency Medicine (SU)
Clinical Head (Director): Diana Princess of Wales Trauma Unit
Department of Surgery Room 4064
Tygerberg Hospital / University of Stellenbosch
PO Box 19063
Tygerberg 7505
Western Cape
South Africa
e-mail: tch at sun.ac.za
Cell: +27824681615
Office: +27219389281 or 4911 pager 0302



-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 4:29 AM
To: trauma-list at trauma.org
Subject: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION


Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the 
political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. We the 
majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a wonderful web 
site. 

I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and 
address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice, 
permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT. 

Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes any way 
he wishes. 

DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and 
Trauma-list. 

k
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html

From: bensonblues at comcast.net
Subject: Apology
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:46:11 +0000
To: trauma-list at trauma.org

Karim,

You are right, and I am sorry. I will forever remained focused like alaser beam.

DB
From: Joe Nold <jnoldscarmaker at yahoo.com>
Subject: Splenic function after embolization
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Trauma &amp, Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Can anyone give some guidance on any recent studies of splenic function after embolization.
I've found some from the 80's looking at auto-transplantation, but can't find much dealing with post-embo spleens.

Any help would be appreciated.

jnoldscarmaker at yahoo.com


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
From: "Bill Griggs" <wgriggs at bigpond.net.au>
Subject: MAST/prehospital interventions - for prehospital providers
CC: "Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:19:37 +0930
To: <farcpr at gmail.com>

Hi Forrest,

My name is Bill Griggs. I am a medical specialist and the Director of 
Trauma at an Australian Major Trauma Centre. I also spent 15 years working 
as a road paramedic and a total of over 30 years working for, and with, 
Ambulance Services. I assume from your post and from your website that you 
are involved in prehospital care? I am pleased to see prehospital care 
providers and other non-medical specialists having the "courage" (a careful 
and deliberate choice of word given some of the responses that one may be 
subjected to!) to post questions here.

One of the problems we have as Ambulance Officer/Paramedic/EMTs is that 
during our training we tend to be given "facts" which for the most part we 
have to accept. The same can be true for medical students. Unfortunately 
medicine is as much art as it is science. So, as new data are uncovered 
sometimes these "facts" change.

So, as a couple of prehospital examples....
- in the past I have used MAST but based on the current data I would not do 
so again.
- in the past I have given bicarbonate and calcium routinely for cardiac 
arrest but based on the current data I would not do so again.

I note that, for both of these interventions, I can remember individual 
cases where there seemed to be an apparent improvement in a patient's 
condition which was related in time to these interventions. However the 
data are very clear, for any identifiable group of patients they are bad and 
worsen outcome. It is really important to avoid the "in my experience" 
fallacy when there are clear data to guide practice.

Did I hurt people with these (and other) interventions? Probably. Do I 
worry about that? A little. How do I deal with that? I try to accept that 
I was doing what I understood was the best treatment at the time, and that 
what the best treatment might be, is constantly subject to change.

Am I doing something in my practice now which, in 5 or 10 years time (or 
sooner), will be shown to be hurting people? Undoubtedly. Do I know which 
bit(s) of my practice that is? No. So, I am hurting some people. What are 
my options?
(1) quit medicine and take up basket weaving or something else. (No offence 
intended to any avid basket weavers out there :-))
(2) keep going and try to adapt my practice in the face of new evidence - 
this means I have to admit to myself that I may be doing things which are 
bad for my patients. This is an extremely important admission because it 
allows me to discard bad practices when they are identified as such, and not 
cling to them for the sake of "tradition" or because to change would mean I 
have to admit I was wrong. I have already admitted I am wrong in advance!

With regard to you question about hypoperfused patients, one of the issues 
is that they are many causes of hypoperfusion. Perhaps not surprisingly, 
what might be good for one cause may be bad for another. To look at your 
example of leg raising, a person who is about to faint but who has normal 
blood volume may benefit from being laid flat and even from having their 
legs raised. This should improve perfusion to the brain and possibly 
prevent them fainting. However, while a person who may be about to pass out 
from internal blood loss could be laid flat, raising the legs is not clearly 
of benefit and may actually cause harm.

One theory is when you are bleeding internally, the resulting lowering of 
your blood pressure and vasoconstriction may both act to slow the rate of 
ongoing bleeding - presumably a good thing! If you raise the legs and 
"autotransfuse" the patient you may raise the blood pressure and the venous 
filling pressures "tricking" the body's pressure and volume receptors into 
decreasing the amount of vasoconstriction. In turn these two factors 
(raised BP and decreased vasoconstriction) turn may lead to an increase in 
the rate of bleeding and a hastening of the patient's death.

Clearly there can be many variables and what actually happens will be 
different from patient to patient.

However there are pretty good data showing that transfusing/ infusing 
patients who have ongoing bleeding without controlling the bleeding is a bad 
thing. I can provide references if you like, but a search of Medline will 
enable you to find articles yourself without having me filter them to 
provide the ones that support my own viewpoint! You do need to learn how to 
assess articles and their raw data, to enable you to make your own make 
judgements. This is because, unfortunately, abstracts and conclusions seem 
too often to be at significant variance from what the actual data may say! 
But decide for yourself.

One more point which is important for prehospital providers to understand. 
The best measure of results is patient outcome across a group of patients. 
However this is not what they are like when we drop them in the ER. It is 
whether they get to go home and what their quality of life is long term. 
Some people will argue that pre-hospital providers can not be responsible 
for what happens in a hospital and therefore the only end point is condition 
on arrival at ER. This argument is just plain wrong. Just think what you 
would want if you were the patient? To have a "good" blood pressure on 
arrival at the ER or to be able to go home alive? They may not be related 
to each other. They may, in some cases, even be alternative choices.

Finally, am I a reliable source? I think so, but maybe not. I have tried 
to explain my rationale/reasoning and I have told you my background for 
context. I have told you about data but not shown that data to you, so my 
words must be treated with a degree of healthy scepticism. Bottom line? - 
if you want to know the answer to something, try looking for some real data 
and critically analyse it yourself - Medline(R) is a good place to start. 
Failing that, ask others, but ask more than one person from more than one 
background, and ask them to please explain the rationale for their views. 
"Coz I say so!" probably doesn't cut it, if you are over 5 years old....

regards

Bill

Dr William M Griggs AM
Director Trauma Service
Royal Adelaide Hospital
South Australia
wgriggs at bigpond.net.au


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Forrest Robleto" 
To: "Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" 
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy


I guess I stand corrected. I got that information from a source I normally
consider reliable. It sounded reasonable so I believed it.

Is elevation of the lower extremities useful in hypoperfusion for those of
us without the ability to introduce fluids?


On 7/31/06, docrickfry at aol.com wrote:
>
> I disagree with this urban legend presented as some sort of authoritative
> fact--please cite just ONE study showing any benefit whatever to MAST
> trousers in Vietnam in improving casualty outcomes. I hope you realize 
> that
> simply raising a blood pressure reading in no way indicates that there was
> any benefit whatever?
> ERF
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: farcpr at gmail.com
> To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> Sent: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
>
>
> MAST trousers got pretty good results in Viet Nam with young otherwise
> healthy men. When applied accross the general population they didn't fare
> as well.



From: "Ian Seppelt" <SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.au>
Subject: Re: MAST/prehospital interventions - for prehospital providers
CC: trauma-list at trauma.org
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:47:51 +1000
To: <wgriggs at bigpond.net.au>

Amen.

Cheers, Ian

Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM
Senior Staff Specialist
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine
The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751
Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney

>>> wgriggs at bigpond.net.au 1/08/2006 3:49pm >>>
Hi Forrest,

My name is Bill Griggs. I am a medical specialist and the Director of

Trauma at an Australian Major Trauma Centre. I also spent 15 years
working 
as a road paramedic and a total of over 30 years working for, and with,

Ambulance Services. I assume from your post and from your website that
you 
are involved in prehospital care? I am pleased to see prehospital care

providers and other non-medical specialists having the "courage" (a
careful 
and deliberate choice of word given some of the responses that one may
be 
subjected to!) to post questions here.

One of the problems we have as Ambulance Officer/Paramedic/EMTs is that

during our training we tend to be given "facts" which for the most part
we 
have to accept. The same can be true for medical students.
Unfortunately 
medicine is as much art as it is science. So, as new data are
uncovered 
sometimes these "facts" change.

So, as a couple of prehospital examples....
- in the past I have used MAST but based on the current data I would
not do 
so again.
- in the past I have given bicarbonate and calcium routinely for
cardiac 
arrest but based on the current data I would not do so again.

I note that, for both of these interventions, I can remember individual

cases where there seemed to be an apparent improvement in a patient's 
condition which was related in time to these interventions. However
the 
data are very clear, for any identifiable group of patients they are
bad and 
worsen outcome. It is really important to avoid the "in my experience"

fallacy when there are clear data to guide practice.

Did I hurt people with these (and other) interventions? Probably. Do
I 
worry about that? A little. How do I deal with that? I try to accept
that 
I was doing what I understood was the best treatment at the time, and
that 
what the best treatment might be, is constantly subject to change.

Am I doing something in my practice now which, in 5 or 10 years time
(or 
sooner), will be shown to be hurting people? Undoubtedly. Do I know
which 
bit(s) of my practice that is? No. So, I am hurting some people. 
What are 
my options?
(1) quit medicine and take up basket weaving or something else. (No
offence 
intended to any avid basket weavers out there :-))
(2) keep going and try to adapt my practice in the face of new evidence
- 
this means I have to admit to myself that I may be doing things which
are 
bad for my patients. This is an extremely important admission because
it 
allows me to discard bad practices when they are identified as such,
and not 
cling to them for the sake of "tradition" or because to change would
mean I 
have to admit I was wrong. I have already admitted I am wrong in
advance!

With regard to you question about hypoperfused patients, one of the
issues 
is that they are many causes of hypoperfusion. Perhaps not
surprisingly, 
what might be good for one cause may be bad for another. To look at
your 
example of leg raising, a person who is about to faint but who has
normal 
blood volume may benefit from being laid flat and even from having
their 
legs raised. This should improve perfusion to the brain and possibly 
prevent them fainting. However, while a person who may be about to
pass out 
from internal blood loss could be laid flat, raising the legs is not
clearly 
of benefit and may actually cause harm.

One theory is when you are bleeding internally, the resulting lowering
of 
your blood pressure and vasoconstriction may both act to slow the rate
of 
ongoing bleeding - presumably a good thing! If you raise the legs and

"autotransfuse" the patient you may raise the blood pressure and the
venous 
filling pressures "tricking" the body's pressure and volume receptors
into 
decreasing the amount of vasoconstriction. In turn these two factors 
(raised BP and decreased vasoconstriction) turn may lead to an increase
in 
the rate of bleeding and a hastening of the patient's death.

Clearly there can be many variables and what actually happens will be 
different from patient to patient.

However there are pretty good data showing that transfusing/ infusing 
patients who have ongoing bleeding without controlling the bleeding is
a bad 
thing. I can provide references if you like, but a search of Medline
will 
enable you to find articles yourself without having me filter them to 
provide the ones that support my own viewpoint! You do need to learn
how to 
assess articles and their raw data, to enable you to make your own make

judgements. This is because, unfortunately, abstracts and conclusions
seem 
too often to be at significant variance from what the actual data may
say! 
But decide for yourself.

One more point which is important for prehospital providers to
understand. 
The best measure of results is patient outcome across a group of
patients. 
However this is not what they are like when we drop them in the ER. It
is 
whether they get to go home and what their quality of life is long
term. 
Some people will argue that pre-hospital providers can not be
responsible 
for what happens in a hospital and therefore the only end point is
condition 
on arrival at ER. This argument is just plain wrong. Just think what
you 
would want if you were the patient? To have a "good" blood pressure on

arrival at the ER or to be able to go home alive? They may not be
related 
to each other. They may, in some cases, even be alternative choices.

Finally, am I a reliable source? I think so, but maybe not. I have
tried 
to explain my rationale/reasoning and I have told you my background for

context. I have told you about data but not shown that data to you,
so my 
words must be treated with a degree of healthy scepticism. Bottom
line? - 
if you want to know the answer to something, try looking for some real
data 
and critically analyse it yourself - Medline(R) is a good place to
start. 
Failing that, ask others, but ask more than one person from more than
one 
background, and ask them to please explain the rationale for their
views. 
"Coz I say so!" probably doesn't cut it, if you are over 5 years
old....

regards

Bill

Dr William M Griggs AM
Director Trauma Service
Royal Adelaide Hospital
South Australia
wgriggs at bigpond.net.au 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Forrest Robleto" 
To: "Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" 
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy


I guess I stand corrected. I got that information from a source I
normally
consider reliable. It sounded reasonable so I believed it.

Is elevation of the lower extremities useful in hypoperfusion for those
of
us without the ability to introduce fluids?


On 7/31/06, docrickfry at aol.com wrote:
>
> I disagree with this urban legend presented as some sort of
authoritative
> fact--please cite just ONE study showing any benefit whatever to
MAST
> trousers in Vietnam in improving casualty outcomes. I hope you
realize 
> that
> simply raising a blood pressure reading in no way indicates that
there was
> any benefit whatever?
> ERF
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: farcpr at gmail.com 
> To: trauma-list at trauma.org 
> Sent: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
>
>
> MAST trousers got pretty good results in Viet Nam with young
otherwise
> healthy men. When applied accross the general population they didn't
fare
> as well.


--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html

######################################################################
Attention: 
This message is intended for the addresses named and may contain 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are 
those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of 
Sydney West Area Health Service.


This e-mail has been scanned for viruses
######################################################################

From: <james9daly at eircom.net>
Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:23:34 +0100
To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

I second this motion,


"Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" wrote:

< 
< Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the 
< political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. We the 
< majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a wonderful web 
< site. 
< 
< I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and 
< address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice, 
< permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT. 
< 
< Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes any way 
< he wishes. 
< 
< DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and 
< Trauma-list. 
< 
< k
< --
< trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
< To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
< http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
< 



-----------------------------------------------------------------
Find the home of your dreams with eircom net property
Sign up for email alerts now http://www.eircom.net/propertyalerts



From: "STEWART, Paul" <PStewart at ambulance.nsw.gov.au>
Subject: RE: Cease fire NOW or pre hospital needle thoracotomy
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:45:13 +1000
To: "Trauma &amp; Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Good grief, what have I started... Guys it was a sarcastic dig at irrelevant diatribe.
I guess my Australian sense of humour is poorly understood across international borders...
Please delete!
MAST suits are only of use when correctly applied to political leaders with uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension!
Cheers
Paul Stewart
Paramedic
ASNSW 

-----Original Message-----
From: docrickfry at aol.com [mailto:docrickfry at aol.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:30 AM
To: trauma-list at trauma.org
Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or pre hospital needle thoracotomy

I am still waiting for any data whatever to support these so authoritative allegations of benefit--in fact, it is very easy to deny the prehospital benefits of MAST trousers--they were shown in a major prospective study almost 20 years ago not only to have no benefit, but to be of harm in the preshospital setting. It is amazing that such assertions continue to be spouted nonetheless. No data exists that these bulky and dangerous garments have any benefit in tamponading bleeding any more effectively than direct manual pressure or pressure dressings. Be careful of so blatantly ignoring the tenets of modern medicine by asserting anecdote and conjecture as proven fact. You cannot support your statment with any data whatever. 
ERF


-----Original Message-----
From: medic541 at hotmail.com
To: trauma-list at trauma.org
Sent: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or pre hospital needle thoracotomy


Fact, direct pressure is used in controlling blood loss we agree??? One excellent use for controlling open wound blood loss, is direct pressure . Directly, m.a.s.t trousers were probably not effective in raising pressure but decreased circulatory volume was a result from increasing the pressure in the bladders to the legs, and therefore the blood was shunted away from the lower extremity, and replaced any blood loss with a crystalloid solution. As far as an urban legend, no one can deny that they have benefits pre hospital but are certainly not the authority in controlling hypovolemia. 

>From: docrickfry at aol.com
>Reply-To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" 
>>
>To: trauma-list at trauma.org
>Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
>Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:51:32 -0400
> 
>I disagree with this urban legend presented as some sort of authoritative >fact--please cite just ONE study showing any benefit whatever to MAST >trousers in Vietnam in improving casualty outcomes. I hope you realize >that simply raising a blood pressure reading in no way indicates that there >was any benefit whatever? 
>ERF
> 
> 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: farcpr at gmail.com
>To: trauma-list at trauma.org
>Sent: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:41 AM
>Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
> 
> 
>MAST trousers got pretty good results in Viet Nam with young otherwise 
>healthy men. When applied accross the general population they didn't 
>fare as well.
> 
>On 7/31/06, Anthony caruso wrote: 
> > 
> > Paul, Im not sure what your asking about the Mast trousers comment. 
> > Is it two questions or are you trying to figure out how MAST 
> > trousers are used in combating Blodd loss? MAST trousers were 
> > removed from our units and throughout the state. They were excellent 
> > when used for immobilization >of femurs or pelvis FX and to 
> > tampanade bleeding, but there were no documented cases where 
> > auto-transfusion took place when inflated. However, that's not to 
> > say that i do not disagree with brining them back.
> > Needle thoracostmy is an advanced skill that is thought to all 
> > paramedics when attending school. However, unless the TPX causing 
> > pressure changes in the chest and pressing agents the heart then 
> > M.A.S.T trousers would be useless in this situation. Anyway Our 
> > state run office of Emergency Medical Services has there hands in 
> > too much of the paramedics daily activities. Hope you have more luck 
> > than we do Regards Anthony M. Caruso Paramedic/Town Of Natick Fire 
> > Department, Natick Massachusetts.
> > >From: "STEWART, Paul" 

> > >Reply-To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" 
> > >
> > >To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" 
> > >Subject: RE: Cease fire NOW or prehospital needle thoracotomy
> > >Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:23:12 +1000
> > > 
> > > Do the Israeli military permit prehospital needle thoracotomies 
> > >and if so, what do the arab states think about bringing back the 
> > >MAST suit to combat this?
> > >Perhaps we could ask the political leaders to provide us with an 
> > >>informed comment.....
> > >My delete button needs replacing. 
> > > 
> > >Regards
> > >Paul Stewart
> > >Paramedic
> > >ASNSW
> > > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Ronald Gross [mailto:Rgross at harthosp.org]
> > >Sent: Monday, 31 July 2006 3:53 AM
> > >To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list
> > >Subject: RE: Cease fire NOW
> > > 
> > >Eric,
> > > 
> > >Seems that Tom has taken the Pulitzer Prize that Rob referred to - 
> > >this
> > one
> > >is for revisionist history........ 
> > > 
> > >Take care,
> > >Ron
> > > 
> > > >>> "Thomas Anthony Horan" 7/30/2006 12:54 PM 
> > > >>> >>>
> > >Dear Erick,
> > > 
> > >What is it that you don't understand? Every nation has a right to 
> > >self defense. In this case 2 soldiers were captured and a war broke 
> > >out. Why
> > now
> > >why this incident? Who knows? 
> > > 
> > >BUT, there is no one on this list who doesn't want to see Israel 
> > >and Palestine living in peace. Although we are moved by the horrors 
> > >of war
> > on
> > >all sides, this is something a lot more dangerous than the usual 
> > >arab israeli conflict. Israeli military dominance is being broken 
> > >and a >cease fire won't save it. Olmerts colossal miscalculation 
> > >has united the terrorists, reinvigorated Syrian influence in 
> > >lebanon, a radical Shia >is the hero of the islamic world, Iran has 
> > >the US ocupied in Lebanon, and
> > it
> > >has silenced moderates in Egypt Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Is israel 
> > >>safer today than 2 weeks ago, despite the killing many innocents 
> > >and a few terrorists?
> > > 
> > >IE It is an unmitigated disaster. 
> > > 
> > >An eye for an eye just dosn´t work, in this particular case it is 
> > >two captured soldiers for a destroyed country.
> > > 
> > >Tom
> > > 
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: docrickfry at aol.com[SMTP:docrickfry at aol.com]
> > > > Reply To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list
> > > > Sent: domingo, 30 de julho de 2006 12:36
> > > > To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW
> > > > 
> > > > I wonder what you would think, or what we would be advocating, 
> > > > if >our
> > >third largest city, Chicago, were being indiscriminately fired 
> > >upon, unprovoked, by a splinter group over the border in Canada, as 
> > >Haifa is >in Israel as their third largest city, with innocent 
> > >American citizens >daily being killed, the Chicago train station 
> > >destroyed, and the rest of the world began blaming us for trying to 
> > >take out those rockets across the border that the Canadian 
> > >government could do nothing about, and calling
> > for
> > >US to cease fire with no comment about the group continuing to fire 
> > >>upon us. Think about whether you would be saying the same thing 
> > >(call me
> > naive,
> > >but I really don't think so...)--to understand another you must 
> > >first >be able to walk a mile in their shoes. If you can honestly 
> > >say that you
> > would
> > >still be calling on US, unilaterally to stop defending ourselves, 
> > >then >at least you are consistent, tho I would question your 
> > >sanity.. I await >the first post somehow telling me that this
> > > > is different.......???? 
> > > > ERF
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: p.bjorn at netzero.net
> > > > To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> > > > Sent: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 7:19 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > With sincere respect, I'd challenge you to objectively itemize 
> > > > the accomplishments of the Israeli military over the past couple 
> > > > of >weeks, or for that matter the Coalition of the Willing's 
> > > > over the past few
> > >years. 
> > > > 
> > > > You're insisting that a cease-fire would be stupid; but it's 
> > > > increasingly clear that our fire-for-effect mentality hasn't 
> > > > done >much for the future of humanity either.
> > > > 
> > > > Civilization hasn't much of a chance until the "good guys" 
> > > > remember how to act civilized. We're allowing ourselves to be 
> > > > drawn in the other direction -- and if you ask my opinion, it's 
> > > > been entirely too
> > >easy to do. 
> > > > Who would have thought in the fall of 2001 that it might ever 
> > > > become difficult to distinguish who the good guys are?
> > > > 
> > > > Pret Bjorn
> > > > Bangor, ME USA
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ronald Gross" 
> > > > To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" 
> > > > 
> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:31 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Cease fire NOW
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Ron also said that the only thing a cease fire now would 
> > > > accomplish >is to make all of the world happy that they did 
> > > > something, while the >bad guys have just that much more time 
> > > > re-arming and preparing for their
> > >next attacks. 
> > > > Cease fires do absolutely nothing unless there is a 
> > > > pre-determined plan that all know both sides will accept. We 
> > > > know this because we have seen history repeat itself for as long as it has been recorded.
> > > > Ron
> > > > 
> > > > >>> ******** ******** 7/30/2006 6:22 AM >>>>
> > > > Dear listers,
> > > > I think this is a trauma forum and not a political arena. 
> > > > Is like going to a Trauma Congress and instead of listening 
> > > > Trauma topics we are hearing the speakers doing political analysis.
> > > > 
> > > > George C. Georgiou
> > > > Gen.Surgeon
> > > > Xanthi Gen.Hospital
> > > > Greece
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > P.S. And while we are speaking our views freely -as Ron 
> > > > >said-innocent people are killed in Lebanon and Israel and 
> > > > 700.000 refugees are suffering in Lebanon.
> > > > ... at least I would rather expect someone of you saying ,Cease 
> > > > fire
> > >NOW. 
> > > > 
> > > > G. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > > > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > > > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > > > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > > > >_______________________________________________________________
> > > > >_______
> > > > __ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, 
> > > > pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
> > > > --
> > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > > > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > > > 
> > >--
> > >trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > >To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > >http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >-----------------------------------------
> > >Confidentiality Notice: 
> > >The information in this message is intended for the named 
> > >recipients
> > only. 
> > >It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are 
> > >not
> > the
> > >intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, take any action 
> > >in reliance on it or disclose any details of this message to any 
> > >other
> > person
> > >or organisation. If you have received this message in error, please
> > delete
> > >this copy. 
> > > 
> > >The Ambulance Service of New South Wales has enabled e-mail 
> > >filtering >and monitoring.
> > 
> > 
> > >--
> > >trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > >To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > >http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's >FREE! 
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > 
> > --
> > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
> > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> > 
> 
> 
>-- V/R 
> 
>Forrest Robleto 
>R House Health & Safety 
>www.RHouseTraining.com 
>FRobleto at RhouseTraining.com 
>609-792-9047 
>-- 
>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG 
>To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
>http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 
>________________________________________________________________________ 
>Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and >IM. All on demand. Always Free. 
>-- 
>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG 
>To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
>http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 

_________________________________________________________________ 
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ 

-- 
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG 
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: 
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.



-----------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice:
The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose any details of this message to any other person or organisation. If you have received this message in error, please delete this copy.

The Ambulance Service of New South Wales has enabled e-mail filtering and monitoring.
From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org>
Subject: Re: Cease fire NOT
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:48:37 -0400
To: <trauma-list at trauma.org>

For cryin' out loud! I know that you really know how to unsubscribe
from this list, so we now all acknowledge your public commentary without
saying a word - and I, for one, agree with your ideas, your ideals, and
your right to express them where ever you choose to do so.

Having said that, please do not remove your name - you have been too
much of a valuable contributor and friend.

Just my humble opinion!
Ron

>>> 7/31/2006 5:43 PM >>>
Please unsubscribe me from the list.

RSS 


-----Original Message-----
From: karim at trauma.org 
To: trauma-list at trauma.org 
Sent: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: Cease fire NOT


Please don't make me start moderating list messages.
There are plenty of political discussion lists out there to have this
sort of 
discussion.
Meanwhile 5-10 members are unsubscribing daily while their mailboxes
are filled 
with these off-topic posts.

So please stop and focus on trauma-specific discussions - or I will
stop it.

Karim

-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On 
Behalf Of bensonblues at comcast.net 
Sent: 31 July 2006 20:04
To: trauma-list at trauma.org 
Subject: Cease fire NOT


The West refuses to believe or can't understand radical Islam.
Christians, Jews, 
agnostics, atheists, and secular muslims are
infidels and apostates, and in the Quran it is clear: God has ordered
that they 
be enslaved (woman, children) or killed if they do
not convert. Hezbollah purposefully "martyrs" their own civilians in
order to 
shift public opinion via the Western media. Recall the
words of bin Laden: "Americans value life; we embrace death." It is
disgusting 
that European nations don't side with Israel in its
fight for its right to exist. The Israelis know all to well what would
happen if 
they capitulated to the demands and desires of the
radicals. And once Israel falls, the "new" Ottoman Empire, in Dr.
Zawahiri's own 
words, will easily metastasize "...to Spain." 

Bush was right about the "axis of evil": Radiacal Islam is a disease
which 
threaten the life of the West. If we looked at terrorism
using the medical model, a cease fire is not appropriate therapy. The
surgical 
approach to cancer is to 'cut it out' quickly, before
it metastasizes, then use medical therapy to suppress reoccurance.
Ahmadinejad 
should be highly scrutinized for his open material
support of Hezbollah, and the 'doctor' treating radical Islam might
want to 
think about some prophylactic measures. This is the way
of the world, and it will always be this way. Even us medical people
have to 
pick sides here. Note that some of the most important
and brutal people in radical Islam have been doctors. 

DB
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 

--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html 
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email
and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html





From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org>
Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:52:55 -0400
To: <trauma-list at trauma.org>

OK Ken, against my better judgement, I will second your motion, and I
will refrain from any further comment about anything political.

As I see it, however, the terrorists have now tried to silence free
speech and have won, at least on this site.....

Ron

>>> 7/31/2006 10:28 PM >>>
Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the 

political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. 
We the 
majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a
wonderful web 
site. 

I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and 

address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice,

permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT. 

Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes
any way 
he wishes. 

DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and 
Trauma-list. 

k
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html





From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org>
Subject: Fwd: ccml Re: Appendicitis/ CT
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:57:16 -0400
To: <trauma-list at trauma.org>

I have now seen everything - and I am very sad.

>>> 7/31/2006 11:12 PM >>>






From: "Karim Brohi" <karimbrohi at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:07:17 +0100
To: "Trauma &amp, Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Ken,

Thanks for this. However I find temporary shunting or ligation more useful
in this sort of situation - even with such a destructive lesion - resorting
to amputation as a last resort. Provided there is still some use in the
extremity, some sort of damage control procedure can usually be employed. I
agree though that we may have to amputate to preserve the life of the list,
or to remove a functionless appendage!

Karim

On 01/08/06, Hardcastle, Tim, Dr wrote:
>
> Ken
>
> As per the suggestion: SECONDED! (I'm sure Tony Joseph from Down Under
> would agree - he suggested this last week already!)
>
> Tim
> Dr T C Hardcastle
> M.B.,Ch.B.(Stell); M.Med(Chir); FCS(SA)
> Senior Surgeon / Senior Lecturer: Surgery (Trauma and ICU)
> ATLS instructor and DSTC Cape Town Course Director
> Intern program Coordinator: Surgery
> Program Manager: Emergency Medicine (SU)
> Clinical Head (Director): Diana Princess of Wales Trauma Unit
> Department of Surgery Room 4064
> Tygerberg Hospital / University of Stellenbosch
> PO Box 19063
> Tygerberg 7505
> Western Cape
> South Africa
> e-mail: tch at sun.ac.za
> Cell: +27824681615
> Office: +27219389281 or 4911 pager 0302
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
> [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 4:29 AM
> To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> Subject: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
>
>
> Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the
> political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. We
> the
> majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a
> wonderful web
> site.
>
> I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and
> address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice,
> permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT.
>
> Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes
> any way
> he wishes.
>
> DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and
> Trauma-list.
>
> k
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
>

From: Tony Joseph <tjoseph at ihug.com.au>
Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:26:48 +1000
To: trauma list <trauma-list at trauma.org>

Thanks Tim
I have held my tongue and think other forums would be better to express
personal views (and I do have some)
The list should remain focused
Regards
Tony


On 1/8/06 2:43 PM, "Hardcastle, Tim, Dr " 
wrote:

> Ken
> 
> As per the suggestion: SECONDED! (I'm sure Tony Joseph from Down Under would
> agree - he suggested this last week already!)
> 
> Tim
> Dr T C Hardcastle
> M.B.,Ch.B.(Stell); M.Med(Chir); FCS(SA)
> Senior Surgeon / Senior Lecturer: Surgery (Trauma and ICU)
> ATLS instructor and DSTC Cape Town Course Director
> Intern program Coordinator: Surgery
> Program Manager: Emergency Medicine (SU)
> Clinical Head (Director): Diana Princess of Wales Trauma Unit
> Department of Surgery Room 4064
> Tygerberg Hospital / University of Stellenbosch
> PO Box 19063
> Tygerberg 7505
> Western Cape
> South Africa
> e-mail: tch at sun.ac.za
> Cell: +27824681615
> Office: +27219389281 or 4911 pager 0302
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
> [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 4:29 AM
> To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> Subject: PLEASE STOP - AMPUTATION
> 
> 
> Dr. Karim, the web master of this site has asked us nicely to STOP the
> political dialogue. Many very good clinicians have dropped out. We the
> majority are allowing a few terrorist to destroy a very good, yes a wonderful
> web 
> site. 
> 
> I vote that effective immediately, the webmaster AMPUTATE the name and
> address of any offender from this list, IMMEDIATELY and without notice,
> permission, informed consent or anesthesia, JUST DO IT.
> 
> Karim needs a second to this motion, and then he can count the votes any way
> he wishes. 
> 
> DO NOT BE A PARTY TO THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION of Trauma.org and
> Trauma-list. 
> 
> k
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html


--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html

 		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.


More information about the trauma-list mailing list