Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Penetrating extremity trauma
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgFri Apr 21 15:16:25 BST 2006
- Previous message: Penetrating extremity trauma
- Next message: Penetrating extremity trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rick, As usual - you are right, and I stand corrected. Ron >>> docrickfry at aol.com 04/21 10:13 AM >>> Ron-- The diagnostic approach to extremity vascular injury has never been shown to differ between stabs or gunshots, shotguns, associated fractures, or in any setting whatever--principles remain the same---absent hard signs excludes a surgically significant vascular injury as accurately as any imaging modlaity--postiive hard signs to OR. There is no evidence whatever to support anything else, and much to refute...Yes stabs have lower risk of vascular injury when asymptomatic, but accuracy of physical findings at predicitng or excluding vascular injury no different. ERF -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Gross <Rgross at harthosp.org> To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:36:04 -0400 Subject: RE: Re: Penetrating extremity trauma Hmmmm - so it is written, so it is done? We are talking stab wounds here. And my radiologists already have more cars then they have the time to drive...... >>> roydanks at hotmail.com 04/21 9:27 AM >>> ABI of > 0.8??!!! That's not standard thinking in vascular surgery, last I knew. ABI of <0.95 is considered abnormal. This, to me, indicates you must at least image the vessel. Doesn't mean you have to do anything, as evidenced by this paper: Validation of Nonoperative Management of Occult Vascular Injuries and Accuracy of Physical Examination Alone in Penetrating Extremity Trauma: 5- to 10-Year Follow-up. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 44(2):243-253, February 1998. Dennis, James W. MD, FACS; Frykberg, Eric R. MD, FACS; Veldenz, Henry C. MD, FACS; Huffman, Susan BA; Menawat, Sunil S. MD So, Ron, if you feel an ABI of 0.85 is "OK", then why bother trying to "figure out which nerve is affected"? You're obviously not interested in repairing the potential arterial injury and you can't do much with a severed nerve (within limits and reason)... so, why bother? Medicolegal? If that's the case, I suggest you review the vascular literature. We image those with ABIs <0.95 who have PVD. Any other thoughts out there? RD _________________________________________________________________ Because e-mail on your cell phone should be easy: Try Windows Live Mail for Mobile beta http://www2.imagine-msn.com/minisites/mail/Default.aspx?locale=en-us-- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: Penetrating extremity trauma
- Next message: Penetrating extremity trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
