Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Prophylactic antibiotics
KMATTOX at aol.com KMATTOX at aol.comSat Apr 15 18:18:55 BST 2006
- Previous message: Prophylactic antibiotics
- Next message: Prophylactic antibiotics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message dated 4/15/2006 12:12:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, bensonblues at comcast.net writes: It is you not getting it. The discussion was about a patient with an acetabular fracture, remember? We operate on that here in Detroit. Oh, yes, and they get prophylactic antiobiotics. What a babbling fool. You need to take your lithium, buddy. DB I am very aware that patients with orthopedic and vascular procedures have always gotten prophylactic antibiotics. Often if here is presumed logic for ONE, THREE are given. If 8 hours of antibiotics are accepted, they are continued for 3 days. If three days are acceptable, they are sometimes continued for 7 days. Although this is common practice, much like the OLD practice of massive fluid resuscitation and cyclic hyperresuscitation, with all its complications, these urban legends continue. The burden of proof falls on those who continue to use something based on culture or blind faith. We can do better than that now. Issues such as MAST PANTS, Renal Dose Dopamine, Interosseous infusions, Rectal washout, Presacral drains, Single shot IVP for penetrating abdominal trauma, etc, etc, etc, are other examples of long held doctrine, but subsequently shown to be urban legends only. I vote more with Rick than with blind urban legend. As a matter of fact, I would be more rigidly opposed to prophylactic antibiotics in the case described, than was Dr. Frykberg. k
- Previous message: Prophylactic antibiotics
- Next message: Prophylactic antibiotics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
