Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
LMA
Bjorn, Pret pbjorn at emh.orgTue Apr 4 13:02:01 BST 2006
- Previous message: "cooling catheter"
- Next message: LMA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The practical applications of the LMA have long since strayed beyond its design specs. My understanding is that LMA is used increasingly in emergency and prehospital applications with great success. Moreover, the manufacturer is improving and expanding its product spectrum approximately every Wednesday. LMA now supplies airways with ET conversion enhancements, and even an airway with a built-in, wireless fiberoptic viewscreen. Pretty quick, the tubes will insert themselves. LMA is poised for global conquest. Pret -----Original Message----- From: Fontana, David [mailto:DFontana at phcn.vic.gov.au] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:54 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: LMA Keep in mind the fact that the LMA was designed for spont vent anaesthesia on ELECTIVE surgical patients. Not for non fasted trauma patients or as a rescue airway. It certainly can be used as a rescue airway in certain circumstances and the fastrach variation is designed as an intubating airway. It was not designed to replace endo-tracheal intubation in situations where intubation would normally be indicated! David R Fontana RN Dip.App.Sci., B.Nsg(N.Ed).,PGrad.Dip.Adv.Clin.Nurs.(Melb.) Associate Nurse Manager Anaesthesia & Post Anaesthesia Care Unit Frankston Hospital Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA 03 9784-7404 -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Andrew J Bowman Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 5:58 To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Re: LMA What is the King LT?? And Jules, since most studies show paramedic ETT rates of less than 90% (and sometimes less than 80%) we most certainly need a backup (haha) Andrew (Nurse & medic) ----- Original Message ----- From: <jkaymdc at aim.com> To: <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:37 PM Subject: Re: LMA > > > >>> Is there any DATA which suggests that the risk of aspiration is > higher with LMA than either endotracheal tube or combitube?< > > > Not that I've seen, I'm going by what the ED physicians and even the > anesthsia people are saying, in my little part of the world. Besides, > I'm a paramedic, don't ya know I'm not really suppose to need a back > up??:) > > The King LT is becoming much more the bridge of choice in trauma > situations in Iowa. There are a couple of studies being conducted here > on that. > > Jules > Julie K. Scadden, NREMT-P, PS > -----Original Message----- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and > industry-leading spam and email virus protection. > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html > -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: "cooling catheter"
- Next message: LMA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
