Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
CT Chest - Screening vs Diagnosis - Aortography
Michael Stein M.D. mgstein at bezeqint.netSat Nov 26 22:12:22 GMT 2005
- Previous message: CT Chest - Screening vs Diagnosis - Aortography
- Next message: AGING of an emergency surgeon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken, Usually I agree with you. This time I will go with Sal and Karim. Mickey ----- Original Message ----- From: <SJASMD at aol.com> To: <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 10:47 PM Subject: Re: CT Chest - Screening vs Diagnosis - Aortography > > ken > for the life of me i cannot understand you stance > > while i do not agree with you, i would be able to understand you if you > said > that you thought that ct was inadequate to characterize an aortic injury. > but to say that you cannot diagnose an aortic injury with ct just eludes > me. > > by the way, i do not think i would be able to see or characterize all the > anomalies you need to see better with angiography than ct. I certainly > cant > > Mind you i am an angiographer first. I am the one who still believes in > angiography for penetrating trauma. i am the one who uses this wonderful > technique every day. but i cannot agree with you when you say that CT is > inferior to > aortography in this circumstance. > > Frankly, with the advent of digital subtraction, I think we lost something > from conventional aortography especially when patients move or breath > > i am not convinced that anyone has ever proven equivalency of digital > subtraction angiography and conventional angiography > > sal > > sal > > In a message dated 11/26/2005 2:05:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > KMATTOX at aol.com writes: > > > In a message dated 11/26/2005 12:11:00 PM Central Standard Time, > mgstein at bezeqint.net writes: > > the modality of choice to diagnose or rule out > Traumatic Toracic Aortic Rupture > > > I could not DISAGREE MORE. I was going along with your argument until > you > chose the word, "diagnose". You simply cannot diagnose blunt thoracic > aortic injury with CTA. Therein lies the real medical legal, ethical, > economic, > and logical problem. > > k > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html > > > > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html >
- Previous message: CT Chest - Screening vs Diagnosis - Aortography
- Next message: AGING of an emergency surgeon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
