Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Va heli crash
Hardcastle Tim, Dr <tch at sun.ac.za> tch at sun.ac.zaFri Jan 14 05:16:21 GMT 2005
- Previous message: Profitable DOES NOT necessitarilly mean beneficial to society
- Next message: Va heli crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken >From an international perspective, I have to agree with you, particularly for Trauma, although I think the only place for urban air ambulances MAY be where it is the ONLY source of ALS personnel available for a large area, if all road ALS personnel are unavailable. This often happens in the province where I work! (We have ONE EMS heli for a population of 4,5 million people, 05h00 till 09h00 daily). There is at any time usually only 16 ALS units for the same size population at any one time on a GOOD day. Tim Dr TC Hardcastle M.B.Ch.B(Stell); ATLS(I), DSTC(I); M.Med(Surg)(Stell); FCS(SA) General Surgeon (Sections Trauma / ICU) Dept. General Surgery University of Stellenbosch / Tygerberg Hospital PO Box 19063, 7505 Operational Head: Diana, Princess of Wales Trauma Centre Program Coordinator: Emergency Medicine Intern Rotation Coordinator: Surgery tch at sun.ac.za <mailto:tch at sun.ac.za> 2 Lorient Close Vredekloof Brackenfell 7560, W. Cape South Africa Cell: +27824681615 Home: +27219813098 Work: +27219384911 pager 0302 -----Original Message----- From: KMATTOX at aol.com [mailto:KMATTOX at aol.com] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:30 AM To: trauma-l at lists.aast.org; trauma-list at trauma.org Cc: ccm-l at ccm-l.org Subject: Re: Va heli crash Condolences to the families of those who died in this air ambulance helicopter crash. May the nurse survivor have a rapid recovery. Although this is never a good time to talk about the efficacy and safety of helicopter operations as air ambulances, if we keep talking around the issue, there will NEVER be a good time. If there is class 1 efficacy data demonstrating a survival advantage and documenting a need for air ambulance helicopters for anything other than wilderness, high rise and off shore rescue, then now is the time for that data to be shared by all of us. We have ignored the many "out of control" issues regarding helicopter air ambulances far too long. To have lost 34 people in helicopter air ambulance crashes this past year is far too many, especially if this expensive ambulance platform (10 X) does not have a survival advantage. Some of the Class I data does show a survival disadvantage and an increase in time for air ambulance vs ground ambulance transport for most urban and suburban missions. Overflights over qualified hospitals for obstetrical, trauma, and medical conditions to take the patient to the hospital that advertises its name on the side decrees the logic for air ambulance to speed care. Many of the air ambulances are OUTSIDE regional trauma systems. Interventions performed by air ambulance crews are often OUTSIDE the trauma QA review. Our responsible professional minds mandate that we take a hard look at this issue, and the safety of this marketing platform. Even the data on patients with head injury who become organ donors demonstrates that the recovery rate for donors is greater when taken by ground ambulance. The incredibly short distances of many of the flights screams for an explanation. The duplicative and excessively expensive helicopter air ambulance services in communities that do not have epidemiological justification for even ONE helicopter raises questions of scarce health care dollar utilization. Finally, the extremely provocative report in J. Trauma by Dr. Bill Miliski of Galveston comparing a period of time during and after availability of helicopter air ambulance, demonstrates no change in outcome after the helicopter service was terminated raises HUGE questions of helicopter benefit to all thinking people. I recognize that the economic marketplace for this business is very powerful. There have even been threats of physical injury retaliation suggested to those who would challenge this helicopter industry. However, should the data which we all now have, including our government, be analyzed for drugs or devices such as Vioxx, carotid stents, coronary stents, heart valves, and many other examples from the past 10 years, there would be federalized and regulatory drug and device recalls. It is time to scientifically justify the helicopter air ambulance. Since the mid 1960s, I have been following the literature on these flying platforms and the ground ambulances and the entire EMS and trauma systems. I find lots of "me too" articles, but efficacy justification over and above ground ambulance EMS organized trauma systems, I simply cannot find, as we apply far more than 90% of the flights.
- Previous message: Profitable DOES NOT necessitarilly mean beneficial to society
- Next message: Va heli crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
