Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
What is the "Golden Hour"?
Bryan Bledsoe bbledsoe at earthlink.netWed Feb 2 16:37:50 GMT 2005
- Previous message: What is the "Golden Hour"?
- Next message: What is the "Golden Hour"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rick: Your last point about the third mode makes sense now that I sit back and look at it. Thanks for pointing that out. BEB Bryan E. Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Midlothian, TX Don't miss EMStock 2005 (http://www.EMStock.com) -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of DocRickFry at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:12 AM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Re: What is the "Golden Hour"? Brian-- I think you have summed up the current state of the art quite eloquently. I don't have a real answer for you, except the obvious that the faster potentially deadly injuries are definitively treated the better the outcome--seems obvious, but hard to actually practice in the heat of battle. I think it is not wise to put a specific time interval on it, even if it makes one feel more comfortable, as striving for the best outcomes is not the same as striving for a specific time--if you strive for four hours, there are an awful lot of injuries where that would be too late--. I agree that the golden one hour is not accurate either, as it is too broad a stroke for such a spectrum of injuries that occur in the real world. What you should do is audit all deaths or adverse outcomes with the goal of looking at their times to definitive treatment, and decide if it could have been less, sooner, or any indication that there was room for improvement. For instance, a ruptured spleen arriving at an ER 15 minutes after injury who then sits hypotensive for four hours before going to the OR, then dies from MSOF a few days later--I think most would agree that is a preventable death, and clearly four hours was too long in that scenario--in others maybe not. One point in your post I would dispute--you said that the third death peak in the trimodal distribution has nothing to do with this issue--that is clearly inaccurate. It has virtually everything to do with it, as so many of those deaths--from MSOF,etc, relate very clearly to the adequacy of the initial resuscitation and urgency of management, as in the above example. ERF
- Previous message: What is the "Golden Hour"?
- Next message: What is the "Golden Hour"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
