Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
O.P.A. vs L.M.A.
Paul Stewart pwstewart at bigpond.comWed Aug 24 12:25:43 BST 2005
- Previous message: O.P.A. vs L.M.A.
- Next message: O.P.A. vs L.M.A.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
" and it makes sense to have them on the ambulances because they are easy to use and pretty much idiot proof." Speaks volumes for your providers clinical governance program! Paul Stewart ASNSW Paramedic -----Original Message----- From: David Sullivan [mailto:fpcems at yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, 23 August 2005 9:48 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Re: O.P.A. vs L.M.A. Roger, I am a prehospital provider and I was taught to use the OPA first then move on to an advanced adjunct like the LMA. Where I live the LMA is mainly used a secondary airway tool in case you cant get your patient intubated. When I did my OR time for my medic, they used LMA's more often, and it makes sense to have them on the ambulances because they are easy to use and pretty much idiot proof. Personally, I prefer to use the OPA because it just a simple adjunct and then move on to ETT. in my limited experience with the LMA I dont mind it, but I have more experience with a Combi-Tube...hope this helped! dave Roger Ekins <remt14 at msn.com> wrote: I am looking for opinions on the use of a OPA airway vs LMA airway in the EMS setting what do you prefer and why? Thanks Roger -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html --------------------------------- Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
- Previous message: O.P.A. vs L.M.A.
- Next message: O.P.A. vs L.M.A.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
