Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER
Robert Smith rfsmith at interaccess.comSat Jul 17 21:25:20 BST 2004
- Previous message: BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER
- Next message: BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If the cytokine, bad cascade is already in max overdrive because of the trauma insult: will old blood make it worse? will young blood make it better? R. Smith _____ From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 12:49 PM To: trauma-list at trauma.org; ccm-l at list.pitt.edu; trauma-l at lists.aast.org Cc: Redstart at aol.com Subject: BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER I was recently in Edinburgh Scotland at the International Blood Banking Meeting. I voiced an oft quoted concern from Trauma & Critical Care physicians that older banked blood (>21 days): 1. Turned on cytokines more than fresh blood 2. Did not carry oxygen as well as fresh blood 3. Was higher in potassium and cellular debris What the audience heard was that I was opposed to banked blood more than 21 days. Actually, I do think that I stated that I would much rather have the freshest blood possible when I have a patient who is massively bleeding, and in the coagulopathic, hypothermic, acidotic patient, I have great concern that old blood (21-35 days old) actually did a great deal in oxygen transport, but was more of a volume expander in such patients. You would have thought that I had made a statement against motherhood, sainthood, and all that is sacred. One person really came after me with a vengeance. I stood my ground, admitted that this was more experiential than evidenced based and asked in return if there is good class I or II evidence that in the acidotic, hypothermic, and coagulopathic trauma patient, old blood participates significantly in oxygen transport? THUS MY QUESTION TO THIS LIST SERVER? Is the oft repeated emotion of us that old banked blood (>21 days), is a volume expander and not of great help in oxygen transport true or an urban legend? I will look it up, of course, but I thought it would be of great interest to this group to debate and produce evidence on both sides of this issue as it is so very emotional. I would like to see both the emotion, and the science, but please try to indicate from which camp you emerge. k -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://list.mistral.net/pipermail/trauma-list/attachments/20040717/09740362/attachment.htm
- Previous message: BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER
- Next message: BANK BLOOD-21 Days old & OLDER
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
