Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Case from last night-What to do #3 repeat
trauma-list@trauma.org trauma-list@trauma.orgTue, 11 Mar 2003 06:38:02 EST
- Previous message: Substantial web site access rise - why?
- Next message: Substantial web site access rise - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--part1_1d3.4d04c49.2b9f249a_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wonder if the #3 post made it through to all list servers. Let me repeat= =20 what that #3 stated. =20 In this case, there may be more than one "correct" course of action, but eac= h=20 action will lead to a different course of action, which may or may not be=20 correct.=A0=20 Bilateral chest tubes were inserted.=A0 First on the left which yielded abou= t=20 400 ml of blood and a persistent small air leak.=A0 A chest tube was inserte= d=20 into the right which then yielded a 300 ml of blood and a small persistent=20 air leak.=A0=A0 A repeat FAST was interpreted as NO HEMOTHORAX and maybe, ju= st=20 maybe a very small=A0 amount of blood in the abdomen.=A0 BP 120/80 at this t= ime.=A0=20 P 100, SO2 was 99.=A0=A0 RR 18.=A0=A0 Like many of you a decision was made t= o do a=20 chest and abdominal CT scan.=A0 In this hospital, the radiology department w= ill=20 not do a trauma abdominal CT with IV contrast unless there has also been ora= l=20 contrast given.=A0 Therefore, he was readied for the CT and given a bunch of= =20 oral contrast to drink, I think it was a liter.=A0=A0 And as most of you kno= w=20 there is a requisite time to wait till the orally administered contrast gets= =20 into the gut.=A0=A0 His urinary output was good the whole time and he had=20 restricted IV administration (as most of you should have already surmised as= =20 he was at BTGH)=A0=A0=20 While waiting for CT to take the patient, he slowly dropped his pressure to=20 85/50, P 110, RR 22, and SO2 of 98.=A0=A0=A0 The nurse reported to the resid= ent=20 that the RIGHT chest tube collection device now contained 1200 ml of blood=20 and that the LEFT had not changed since the original insertion.=A0=A0 I have= =20 attached the original and subsequent Chest X-Rays and the Chest Tube=20 collection device as ATTACHMENTS (a zip file) so that each of you can enhanc= e=20 anyway you wish.=A0=A0 For the really astute among you there was a very subt= le=20 sign on the original chest x-ray which is now more pronounced that aids in=20 the ultimate diagnosis and decision making.=A0=A0=20 Almost as soon as the low BP was noted (taken by an automatic device, not a=20 direct cuff with a nurse attached) a cuff pressure was taken which was=20 110/80. Remember, critical decision nodes, once the decision is made, might tie your= =20 hands to stay on that route of thinking and therapy.=A0=20 You must understand that there was considerable discussion among the trauma=20 surgeon, the residents, the thoracic resident, the thoracic staff, the=20 radiology staff as to what was the "standard" next step, all the way from=20 going stat to the OR, to getting additional studies.=A0=A0=A0=20 --part1_1d3.4d04c49.2b9f249a_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE= =3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">I wonder if the #3 post made it through to all list se= rvers. Let me repeat what that #3 stated. <BR> In this case, there may be more than one "correct" course of action, but eac= h action will lead to a different course of action, which may or may not be=20= correct.=A0 <BR> <BR> Bilateral chest tubes were inserted.=A0 First on the left which yielded abou= t 400 ml of blood and a persistent small air leak.=A0 A chest tube was inser= ted into the right which then yielded a 300 ml of blood and a small persiste= nt air leak.=A0=A0 A repeat FAST was interpreted as NO HEMOTHORAX and maybe,= just maybe a very small=A0 amount of blood in the abdomen.=A0 BP 120/80 at=20= this time.=A0 P 100, SO2 was 99.=A0=A0 RR 18.=A0=A0 Like many of you a decis= ion was made to do a chest and abdominal CT scan.=A0 In this hospital, the r= adiology department will not do a trauma abdominal CT with IV contrast unles= s there has also been oral contrast given.=A0 Therefore, he was readied for=20= the CT and given a bunch of oral contrast to drink, I think it was a liter.= =A0=A0 And as most of you know there is a requisite time to wait till the or= ally administered contrast gets into the gut.=A0=A0 His urinary output was g= ood the whole time and he had restricted IV administration (as most of you s= hould have already surmised as he was at BTGH)=A0=A0 <BR> <BR> While waiting for CT to take the patient, he slowly dropped his pressure to=20= 85/50, P 110, RR 22, and SO2 of 98.=A0=A0=A0 The nurse reported to the resid= ent that the RIGHT chest tube collection device now contained 1200 ml of blo= od and that the LEFT had not changed since the original insertion.=A0=A0 I h= ave attached the original and subsequent Chest X-Rays and the Chest Tube col= lection device as ATTACHMENTS (a zip file) so that each of you can enhance a= nyway you wish.=A0=A0 For the really astute among you there was a very subtl= e sign on the original chest x-ray which is now more pronounced that aids in= the ultimate diagnosis and decision making.=A0=A0 <BR> <BR> Almost as soon as the low BP was noted (taken by an automatic device, not a=20= direct cuff with a nurse attached) a cuff pressure was taken which was 110/8= 0.<BR> <BR> Remember, critical decision nodes, once the decision is made, might tie your= hands to stay on that route of thinking and therapy.=A0 <BR> <BR> You must understand that there was considerable discussion among the trauma=20= surgeon, the residents, the thoracic resident, the thoracic staff, the radio= logy staff as to what was the "standard" next step, all the way from going s= tat to the OR, to getting additional studies.=A0=A0=A0 <BR> <BR> </FONT></HTML> --part1_1d3.4d04c49.2b9f249a_boundary--
- Previous message: Substantial web site access rise - why?
- Next message: Substantial web site access rise - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
