Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Non-traumatic cervical immobilization!
Andrew J Bowman trauma-list@trauma.orgFri, 7 Feb 2003 12:57:50 -0500
- Previous message: Non-traumatic cervical immobilization!
- Next message: URGENT: U.S. Trauma System Funds
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C2CEA8.8561C540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pret, I agree, with significant blunt trauma situation the last thing the = medic should be concerned with is clearing the c-spine. However, I feel = that this type of protocol eliminates the knee-jerk reflex by many EMS = personnel that a bump on the head equals c-spine injury. Not all EMS = (and not all medical people in general) keep up to date with advances in = their respective disciplines, preferring to do it "just like I always = have". Anecdotally, I can tell you that fewer "minor"traumas are = arriving to my ED with c-collar and LBB. However, and rightly so, the = "major"traumas still have it in place. Andrew ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bjorn, Pret=20 To: 'trauma-list@trauma.org'=20 Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Non-traumatic cervical immobilization! Andrew et al, This approach closely approximates Maine's protocol, which is based on = NEXUS recommendations, which in turn essentially attempt to provide an = evidentiary foundation for common sense. There are virtually no = significant blunt trauma scenarios in which conventional rule-out = criteria would predictably lower the rate of unnecessary spinal = immobilization. =20 I'm not criticizing, mind you; the end effect might simply be that = we've been doing the right thing for decades. I'm just not sure what = all the excitement's about. I'm interested to know if anyone has shown such guidelines to usefully = alter prehospital practice or performance. My guess is that for = otherwise conscientious trauma care providers, they don't. =20 Pret Bjorn Trauma Coordinator EMMC Trauma Program 489 State Street Bangor, ME 04401 207.973.7260 (office) 207.973.7673 (fax) 207.941.5085 (voice pager) ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C2CEA8.8561C540 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Pret,</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>I agree, with significant = blunt trauma=20 situation the last thing the medic should be concerned with is clearing = the=20 c-spine. However, I feel that this type of protocol eliminates the = knee-jerk reflex by many EMS personnel that a bump on the head equals = c-spine=20 injury. Not all EMS (and not all medical people in general) keep = up to=20 date with advances in their respective disciplines, preferring to do it = "just=20 like I always have". Anecdotally, I can tell you that fewer = "minor"traumas=20 are arriving to my ED with c-collar and LBB. However, and rightly = so, the=20 "major"traumas still have it in place.</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Andrew</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dpbjorn@emh.org href=3D"mailto:pbjorn@emh.org">Bjorn, = Pret</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20 href=3D"mailto:'trauma-list@trauma.org'">'trauma-list@trauma.org'</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 07, 2003 = 12:30=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Non-traumatic = cervical=20 immobilization!</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000>Andrew et = al,<BR><BR>This=20 approach closely approximates Maine's protocol, which is based on = NEXUS=20 recommendations, which in turn essentially attempt to provide an = evidentiary=20 foundation for common sense. There are virtually no significant = blunt=20 trauma scenarios in which conventional rule-out criteria would = predictably=20 lower the rate of unnecessary spinal immobilization. =20 </FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial = color=3D#800000></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000>I'm not = criticizing, mind=20 you; the end effect might simply be that we've been doing the right = thing for=20 decades. I'm just not sure what all the excitement's=20 about.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2>I'm interested to = know if anyone=20 has shown such guidelines to usefully alter prehospital practice or=20 performance. My guess is that for otherwise conscientious trauma = care=20 providers, they don't. </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN = class=3D030133519-19052000>Pret=20 Bjorn</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000>Trauma Coordinator</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN = class=3D030133519-19052000>EMMC=20 Trauma Program</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN = class=3D030133519-19052000>489=20 State Street</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000>Bangor, ME 04401</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000>207.973.7260 (office)</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000>207.973.7673 (fax)</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D030133519-19052000>207.941.5085 (voice=20 pager)</SPAN></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C2CEA8.8561C540--
- Previous message: Non-traumatic cervical immobilization!
- Next message: URGENT: U.S. Trauma System Funds
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
