Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes

 

Modify Your Subscription

Modify

 

Home > List Archives

List Archives

For your convenience, find the Trauma List Archive Below

Difficult complication

trauma-list@trauma.org trauma-list@trauma.org
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:51:58 EDT 

--part1_10d.238ce93c.2bddb90e_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Vascular injury to SMA not apparent at first operation.  Either dissection or 
embolization or occlusion.   A "second" and/or "third" look via operation or 
arteriography of the SMA might have been in order due to mechanism of injury. 
   It is never wrong to have a second or third look in this kind of case, 
even if everything is "normal" at the second operation

k

--part1_10d.238ce93c.2bddb90e_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"=
Book Antiqua" LANG=3D"0">Vascular injury to SMA not apparent at first operat=
ion.&nbsp; Either dissection or embolization or occlusion.&nbsp;&nbsp; A "se=
cond" and/or "third" look via operation or arteriography of the SMA might ha=
ve been in order due to mechanism of injury.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It is never w=
rong to have a second or third look in this kind of case, even if everything=
 is "normal" at the second operation<BR>
<BR>
k</FONT></HTML>

--part1_10d.238ce93c.2bddb90e_boundary--