Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
C-spine clearance
ecthompson trauma-list@trauma.orgSat, 26 Apr 2003 13:33:46 -0500
- Previous message: C-spine clearance
- Next message: C-spine clearance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C30BF8.76606690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would add that sagittal reconstructions are very helpful. Plain films of the c-spine are .retardedly difficult to interpret. There are so many shadows that overlap and criss-cross. Line-up these lines on this view, then look at the Scotty dog on this view, the odontoid has .. It is near impossible to truly feel comfortable about c-spine plain films. E Errington C. Thompson, MD Trauma Surgeon Trinity Mother Frances Tyler, Tx ecthompson@tyler.net Don't think you are Know you are - Morpheus (The Matrix) -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org] On Behalf Of DocRickFry@aol.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 7:59 AM To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: Re: C-spine clearance In a message dated 4/26/2003 6:18:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jrmk@mweb.co.za writes: What I do want to as ask is whether their statement that they refuse full neck CT, due to the amount of radiation involved. They refuse to budge from the fact that they will only CT the areas which show abnormality on X-ray review (AP and lateral only are taken) if unevaluable or in the case of a conscious patient, the areas of tenderness +- AP lateral X-rays abnormalities. Well, a few points: First, IF you are going to use plain films as a screen, it is now well established that a lateral, or the two views you use, are worthless--do not at all accomplish what you want, i.e. screening for injury, because they can miss too many. You must at least do the standard three views--AP, lateral and odontoid. Second--it is now becoming increasingly clear that CT of the full c-spine far and away finds many more injuries than does plain films, and several papers are now coming out all showing this. We used to have the same philosophy as your radiologists, but this should be reconsidered. As a start if you want to acquaint yourself with the current literature and consensus, try the EAST Practice Management Guidelines at www.east.org. Also on that website is a listing of the abstracts from the 2003 EAST meeting, where you will find 5 papers dealing with c-spine clearance that will be published later this year--all conclude the same thing regarding CT vs plain films ERF ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C30BF8.76606690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <meta name=3DProgId content=3DWord.Document> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 10"> <meta name=3DOriginator content=3D"Microsoft Word 10"> <link rel=3DFile-List href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2003-April/3D"cid:filelist.xml@01C30BF8.762DE4E0"> <o:SmartTagType = namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"PersonName"/> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState> <w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState> <w:DocumentKind>DocumentEmail</w:DocumentKind> <w:EnvelopeVis/> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:553679495 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} p.MsoAutoSig, li.MsoAutoSig, div.MsoAutoSig {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:navy; font-weight:normal; font-style:normal;} span.SpellE {mso-style-name:""; mso-spl-e:yes;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */=20 table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]--> </head> <body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dblue style=3D'tab-interval:.5in'> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman" FAMILY=3DSANSSERIF><span = style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:navy'>I would add that sagittal reconstructions are very = helpful.<span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> </span>Plain films of the <span = class=3DSpellE>c</span>-spine are …retardedly difficult to interpret.<span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> </span>There are so many shadows that = overlap and criss-cross. <span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> </span>Line-up = these lines on this view, then look at the Scotty dog on this view, the = odontoid has …. It is near impossible to truly feel comfortable about <span = class=3DSpellE>c</span>-spine plain films.<span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> = </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nb= sp;</o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:navy'>E<o:p></= o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nb= sp;</o:p></span></font></p> <div> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><st1:PersonName><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New Roman"><span = style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof: yes'>Errington</span></font></st1:PersonName><font color=3Dnavy><span style=3D'color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'> C. Thompson, = MD<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>Trauma = Surgeon<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>Trinity Mother = Frances<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>Tyler, = Tx<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><st1:PersonName><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New Roman"><span = style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof: yes'>ecthompson</span></font></st1:PersonName><font color=3Dnavy><span style=3D'color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>@tyler.net<o:p></o:p></span></font>= </p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'><o:p> </o:p><= /span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>Don't think you = are<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'>Know you = are<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoAutoSig><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy;mso-no-proof:yes'><span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> &nbs= p;  = ; </span>- Morpheus (The Matrix)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New = Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nb= sp;</o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D2 = face=3DTahoma><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original = Message-----<br> <b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> = trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org] <b><span = style=3D'font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>DocRickFry@aol.com<br> <b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Saturday, April 26, = 2003 7:59 AM<br> <b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> = trauma-list@trauma.org<br> <b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: C-spine = clearance</span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 = face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D2 = face=3DArial><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>In a message dated = 4/26/2003 6:18:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jrmk@mweb.co.za writes:<br> <br style=3D'mso-special-character:line-break'> <![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br = style=3D'mso-special-character:line-break'> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial'>What I do want to as ask is whether their statement = that they refuse full neck CT, due to the amount of radiation involved. = They refuse to budge from the fact that they will only CT the areas which = show abnormality on X-ray review (AP and lateral only are taken) if = unevaluable or in the case of a conscious patient, the areas of tenderness +- AP = lateral X-rays abnormalities.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D2 = face=3DArial><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><br> <br> Well, a few points:<br> First, IF you are going to use plain films as a screen, it is now well established that a lateral, or the two views you use, are worthless--do = not at all accomplish what you want, i.e. screening for injury, because they = can miss too many. You must at least do the standard three views--AP, = lateral and odontoid.<br> Second--it is now becoming increasingly clear that CT of the full = c-spine far and away finds many more injuries than does plain films, and several = papers are now coming out all showing this. We used to have the same = philosophy as your radiologists, but this should be reconsidered.<br> As a start if you want to acquaint yourself with the current literature = and consensus, try the EAST Practice Management Guidelines at <a = href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2003-April/3D"www.east.org">www.east.org</a>. Also on that website is a listing of the abstracts from the 2003 EAST = meeting, where you will find 5 papers dealing with c-spine clearance that will be published later this year--all conclude the same thing regarding CT vs = plain films<br> ERF</span></font><o:p></o:p></p> </div> </body> </html> ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C30BF8.76606690--
- Previous message: C-spine clearance
- Next message: C-spine clearance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
