Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
C-spine clearance
Karim Brohi trauma-list@trauma.orgFri, 25 Apr 2003 17:45:43 +0100
- Previous message: C-spine clearance
- Next message: No CPR Required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rick, We changed our protocol on 1st February 2002 to use whole-cspine CT in unconscious patients to clear the cervical spine and then remove spinal precautions. We're submitting a year's worth of unconscious, intubated patients (236) to the J Trauma this month. No one wants to miss an injury. However the incidence of unstable, ligamentous or disc injury without CT evidence is very low. Our previous protocol included MRI but proved to expensive - in terms of intensivist time away from the unit and MRI time - and as such patients still were not being cleared until day 4,5,6,7... Our Trauma Committee concluded that the detrimental effects on the majority of patients of prolonged spinal immobilisation outweighed the potential possibility of missing an undisplaced, unstable ligamentous injury. Individual institutions must decide what level of risk they are prepared to accept, and at what cost, given that no test is ever 100%. Karim PS. If one were to take clinical examination to the extreme - do you wait until your ICU patient has documented sub-therapeuric levels of benzodiazepine, propofol, morphine and as returned to normal psychomotor function before examining them? It's all very hazy - and a lot of hysteria is propogated about the subject of cervical spine clearance. PPS. The lateral cervical spine film in the above patient group had a sensitivity of 29%. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]On Behalf Of DocRickFry@aol.com Sent: 25 April 2003 15:58 To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: Re: C-spine clearance In a message dated 4/24/2003 8:25:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, mmcbridemd@yahoo.com writes: > Now, you do mention concensus opinion, which is helpful. But are there data to demonstrate that this approach would be contraindicated? It seems as though the data about CT > concludes no missed injuries - ligamentous or otherwise. > I am not aware of any studies or data indicating CT alone allows removal of collar--if you know of such could you share it with us? All studies of which I am aware indicate that imaging is only a first step to excluding c-spine injury, not the final step. The only thing that allows "clearance" of the c-spine in the initial evaluation is no cervical spine tenderness on exam in an awake and responsive patient. Obviously there are still many holes in our knowledge of this, and still many issues persist, which is why so many protocols still exist ERF -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: C-spine clearance
- Next message: No CPR Required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
