Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Spine Immobilization
Jenny Moncur trauma-list@trauma.orgThu, 17 Apr 2003 16:21:31 +1000
- Previous message: Spine Immobilization
- Next message: Spine Immobilization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, Nick, that's what I do. I don't think my practice is harmful - maybe you would like find empirical= evidence that what I do poses an increased risk to the patient. There would be many who would also like to know. Jenny *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 16/04/03 at 6:27 PM Nick Nudell wrote: >>The soft immobilization is there to remind the patient to hold still. > >Yes, but the question remains... if it is important for the patient to= hold >still (because of possible injury) then what are you going to do when >something beyond the patients control happens? > >If it really is not a risk, then what is the reason for soft >immobilization? >If it is a risk, then why perform soft immobilization, which is really a >misnomer as there is no immobilization taking place. > >Regards >Nick > > > >-- >trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html Jenny Moncur 'Mullungdung Arabians' Willung South, Victoria Situated near the beautiful Mullungdung State Forest in Gippsland ph/fax (03) 5194 2226 email jmoncur@netspace.net.au
- Previous message: Spine Immobilization
- Next message: Spine Immobilization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
