Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Trauma destination legislation
trauma-list@trauma.org trauma-list@trauma.orgFri, 4 Apr 2003 10:03:10 EST
- Previous message: "No So FAST"
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--part1_1e5.60644b7.2bbef8ae_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paramedics around the world most often make appropriate judgment decisions. Sometimes they are required to make decisions regarding destination because of political or economic forces. If in the judgment of a paramedic, a trauma patient, or any patient with an advanced condition (stroke, heart attack, leaking aneurysm, etc) is taken to a designated regional specialized health center, that paramedic should be complimented. If that paramedic is sued for making a sound judgment that is in the best interest of patient care, that case is defendable and those of us on this list should rent a 777, and travel around the world and flood the court room and loudly declare the correctness of this system approach working. It is more likely that a paramedic or ambulance service would be successfully sued, if they took a critical patient to a hospital that the paramedics knew was not capable at that point in time to provide the needed service. This principle is what this web site has been supporting for years. Let us now assure that our local laws and federal laws protect this principle. k --part1_1e5.60644b7.2bbef8ae_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE= =3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">Paramedics around the world most often make appropriat= e judgment decisions. Sometimes they are required to make decisions re= garding destination because of political or economic forces. &nbs= p; If in the judgment of a paramedic, a trauma patient, or any patient with=20= an advanced condition (stroke, heart attack, leaking aneurysm, etc) is taken= to a designated regional specialized health center, that paramedic should b= e complimented. If that paramedic is sued for making a sound jud= gment that is in the best interest of patient care, that case is defendable=20= and those of us on this list should rent a 777, and travel around the world=20= and flood the court room and loudly declare the correctness of this system a= pproach working. It is more likely that a paramedic or ambulance= service would be successfully sued, if they took a critical patient to a ho= spital that the paramedics knew was not capable at that point in time to pro= vide the needed service. <BR> <BR> This principle is what this web site has been supporting for years. Le= t us now assure that our local laws and federal laws protect this principle.= <BR> <BR> k </FONT></HTML> --part1_1e5.60644b7.2bbef8ae_boundary--
- Previous message: "No So FAST"
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
