Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
"No So FAST"
trauma-list@trauma.org trauma-list@trauma.orgFri, 04 Apr 2003 09:59:15 -0500
- Previous message: Trauma destination legislation
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message dated 4/3/2003 7:36:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, cmursic@yahoo.com writes: > You've missed my point. It is only by performing > studies of this type that we can ever conclude with > any degree of certainty that FAST is an inappropriate > test in stable abdominal trauma victims when CT is > readily available. Was this study really necessary? > Maybe, maybe not. It clearly DOES adds to a small but > increasing body of literature on the subject and > supports my and, I think, your bias that stable > patients are better off getting CT scanned than > FAST-ed. Unless you can show that THE definitive > article on the matter already exists, dismissing this > study as irrelevant seems a bit short-sighted. Caesar-- I agree with this line of thought ERF
- Previous message: Trauma destination legislation
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
