Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Trauma destination legislation
Bjorn, Pret trauma-list@trauma.orgFri, 4 Apr 2003 08:50:13 -0500
- Previous message: R: Renal injury - Part 1r
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FAB1.1DF3D670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Jeff, Because all protocols are local, this seems a more appropriate set of questions for your regional EMS council. I'm betting your state's informed consent and trauma triage protocols are already reconcilable. The good news is that criminal penalties must be pursued by the state, which is rightfully reluctant to file charges against a state-licensed public servant, unless he's done something utterly and indefensibly inappropriate. As long as you're following one protocol or the other, such is a tough line to cross. The bad news is that anybody with the time, resources and inclination can sue you. That being the case, your best defense is to a) consistently make your decisions based on the best medical interests of the patient, and b) enlist the support of on-line medical control. In this particular scenario, I'd further suggest that you consider the consequences either decision: generally it's much easier to defend against wrongful restraint than preventable death or disability. Pret Bjorn Trauma Coordinator EMMC Trauma Program 489 State Street Bangor, ME 04401 207.973.7260 (office) 207.973.7673 (fax) 207.941.5085 (voice pager) -----Original Message----- From: medic245@mindspring.com [ <mailto:medic245@mindspring.com> mailto:medic245@mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:58 PM To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: Trauma destination legislation Does anyone have knowledge of legislation that provides legal protection to prehospital crews that transport trauma victims to trauma hospitals despite wishes to the contrary by family? Scenario: Prehospital crew responds to trauma victim (MVC rollover, unrestrained, positive loss of consciousness, possible hemothorax, varied other minor injuries. Hemodynamically unstable, GCS = 13.) Family on scene requests crew take patient to small, community hospital, while paramedics feel the patient should be at regional trauma center. Transport times are nearly equal. Despite efforts to explain the need for trauma center capabilities, family does not agree to decision. 1. Where does the patient go? 2. Should the EMS crew take to trauma center? 3. Legal ramifications for either decision? 4. Anyone have state regulations that cover the gluteus maximus of the medics IF they were to transport to the trauma center (what is to prevent a "kidnapping/false imprisonment" charges?) Any/all input is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jeff Brosius, Paramedic, etc. Atlanta, GA medic245@mindspring.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: <http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html> http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FAB1.1DF3D670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <TITLE></TITLE> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2>Jeff,</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2>Because all protocols are local, this seems a more appropriate set of questions for your regional EMS council. I'm betting your state's informed consent and trauma triage protocols are already reconcilable.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2>The good news is that criminal penalties must be pursued by the state, which is rightfully reluctant to file charges against a state-licensed public servant, unless he's done something utterly and indefensibly inappropriate. As long as you're following one protocol or the other, such is a tough line to cross.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2>The bad news is that anybody with the time, resources and inclination can sue you. That being the case, your best defense is to a) consistently make your decisions based on the best medical interests of the patient, and b) enlist the support of on-line medical control. </FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2>In this particular scenario, I'd further suggest that you consider the consequences either decision: generally it's much easier to defend against wrongful restraint than preventable death or disability.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial><FONT size=2> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>Pret Bjorn</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>Trauma Coordinator</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>EMMC Trauma Program</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>489 State Street</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>Bangor, ME 04401</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>207.973.7260 (office)</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>207.973.7673 (fax)</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=030133519-19052000>207.941.5085 (voice pager)</SPAN></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV></FONT></FONT><BR> <P><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: medic245@mindspring.com [</FONT><A href="mailto:medic245@mindspring.com"><FONT face=Arial>mailto:medic245@mindspring.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial>]<BR>Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:58 PM<BR>To: trauma-list@trauma.org<BR>Subject: Trauma destination legislation<BR><BR><BR>Does anyone have knowledge of legislation that provides legal protection to<BR>prehospital crews that transport trauma victims to trauma hospitals<BR>despite wishes to the contrary by family?<BR><BR>Scenario: Prehospital crew responds to trauma victim (MVC rollover,<BR>unrestrained, positive loss of consciousness, possible hemothorax, varied other<BR>minor injuries. Hemodynamically unstable, GCS = 13.) Family on scene<BR>requests crew take patient to small, community hospital, while paramedics feel<BR>the patient should be at regional trauma center. Transport times are<BR>nearly equal. Despite efforts to explain the need for trauma center<BR>capabilities, family does not agree to decision. <BR><BR>1. Where does the patient go?<BR>2. Should the EMS crew take to trauma center?<BR>3. Legal ramifications for either decision?<BR>4. Anyone have state regulations that cover the gluteus maximus of the<BR>medics IF they were to transport to the trauma center (what is to prevent a<BR>"kidnapping/false imprisonment" charges?)<BR><BR>Any/all input is greatly appreciated.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR>Jeff Brosius,<BR>Paramedic, etc.<BR>Atlanta, GA<BR>medic245@mindspring.com<BR><BR><BR>--<BR>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG<BR>To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:<BR></FONT><A href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2003-April/"http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html" target=_blank><FONT face=Arial>http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html</FONT></A><BR></FONT></P></BODY></HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FAB1.1DF3D670--
- Previous message: R: Renal injury - Part 1r
- Next message: Trauma destination legislation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
