Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment - with basilar skull fracture
Rowley Cottingham trauma-list@trauma.orgWed, 22 May 2002 15:19:11 +0100
- Previous message: Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment - with basilar skull fracture
- Next message: Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment -
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C201A4.065519E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am always concerned to read single case reports. There are three possible culprits; the patient, the device or the carer. As nobody has put together a series I am inclined to believe the old adage that there is no cavity in the human body that the ignorant cannot penetrate if they try hard enough. The plural of anecdote is not science. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]On Behalf Of Barry Armstrong Sent: 21 May 2002 23:10 To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: RE: Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment - with basilar skull fracture Timothy: These tubes can indeed be dangerous. See references between the lines. Barry Armstrong General Surgeon Dryden, Ontario, Canada -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Coats >> perhaps, in need of ventilation and oxygenation. Can nasal intubation be > an >> acceptable option here? > > my opinion is no... i wouldn't put anything up the nose of a casualty with > head injury... the picture of the ng tube coiled inside the cranium springs > to mind... This is a popular myth not backed by evidence. An NG tube (and a nasal epistat) are narrow hard tubes that can (very rarely) penetrate the cranium. A nasopharygeal tube is wide and soft and will not go through a base of skull fracture. (it is also well tolerated by the patient and unlikely to make them gag. In our pre-hsopital system we routinely place two nasopharyngeal airways in head injured patients to help maximise oxygenation. It is important that we debunk this myth as nasopharyngeal airways have several advantages over oro-pharyngeal airways but are little used due to the erroneous fear of cranial penetration. Muzzi DA. Losasso TJ. Cucchiara RF. Complication from a nasopharyngeal airway in a patient with a basilar skull fracture. Anesthesiology. 74(2):366-8, 1991 Feb. There is little need in our pre-hospital system for naso-tracheal intubation so I cannot really speak from experience. However, in the same way a naso-tracheal tube is too wide to penetrate the cribriform plate so there should be little reason to worry. I have seen no reports of cerebral intubation (!) ... Marlow TJ. Goltra DD Jr. Schabel SI.(Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.) Intracranial placement of a nasotracheal tube after facial fracture: a rare complication. [see Comment in: J Emerg Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;15(2):243-4 .]. [Review] Journal of Emergency Medicine. 15(2):187-91, 1997 Mar-Apr. Abstract Extensive facial trauma is often associated with fractures to the skull base, cribriform plate, and sphenoid sinus. Attempted intubation of patients with facial trauma may result in intracranial penetration and placement of nasogastric or nasotracheal tubes into the brain. Such a complication carries significant morbidity and mortality. Intracranial placement of nasogastric tubes has been reported multiple times in the literature. Intracranial placement of a nasotracheal tube, however, has been reported only twice. Such a case is presented, along with a review of the literature and a discussion. [References: 12] and head injured patients routinely have nasal intubation in the intensive care unit. Tim. -- Mr. T J Coats Senior Lecturer in Accident, Emergency and Pre-Hospital Care Bart's and the Royal London School of Medicine ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C201A4.065519E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dwindows-1252"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><SPAN class=3D350095913-22052002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2>I am=20 always concerned to read single case reports. There are three possible = culprits;=20 the patient, the device or the carer. As nobody has put together a = series I am=20 inclined to believe the old adage that there is no cavity in the human = body that=20 the ignorant cannot penetrate if they try hard enough. The plural of = anecdote is=20 not science.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT = face=3DTahoma=20 size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> = trauma-list-admin@trauma.org=20 [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Barry=20 Armstrong<BR><B>Sent:</B> 21 May 2002 23:10<BR><B>To:</B>=20 trauma-list@trauma.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: Initial trauma = management in RTC=20 entrapment - with basilar skull fracture<BR><BR></FONT></DIV> <P><FONT size=3D2>Timothy:<BR><BR><FONT color=3D#ff0000>These tubes = can indeed be=20 dangerous. See references between the lines.</FONT></FONT></P> <DIV align=3Dleft><BR><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Barry = Armstrong</FONT></DIV> <DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>General = Surgeon</FONT></DIV> <DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dryden, Ontario,=20 Canada</FONT></DIV><FONT size=3D2> <P>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Timothy = Coats<BR><BR><BR>>>=20 perhaps, in need of ventilation and oxygenation. Can nasal = intubation=20 be<BR>> an<BR>>> acceptable option here?<BR>><BR>> my = opinion=20 is no... i wouldn't put anything up the nose of a casualty = with<BR>> head=20 injury... the picture of the ng tube coiled inside the cranium = springs<BR>>=20 to mind...<BR>This is a popular myth not backed by evidence. An NG = tube (and a=20 nasal<BR>epistat) are narrow hard tubes that can (very rarely) = penetrate the=20 cranium.<BR>A nasopharygeal tube is wide and soft and will not go = through a=20 base of<BR>skull fracture. (it is also well tolerated by the patient = and=20 unlikely to<BR>make them gag.<BR><BR>In our pre-hsopital system we = routinely=20 place two nasopharyngeal airways in<BR>head injured patients to help = maximise=20 oxygenation. It is important that we<BR>debunk this myth as = nasopharyngeal=20 airways have several advantages over<BR>oro-pharyngeal airways but are = little=20 used due to the erroneous fear of<BR>cranial penetration.</FONT><FONT=20 size=3D2><BR><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Muzzi DA. Losasso TJ. = Cucchiara RF.=20 <STRONG>Complication from a nasopharyngeal airway in a patient with a = basilar=20 skull fracture.</STRONG> Anesthesiology. 74(2):366-8, 1991=20 Feb.<BR></FONT><BR>There is little need in our pre-hospital system for = naso-tracheal intubation<BR>so I cannot really speak from experience. = However,=20 in the same way a<BR>naso-tracheal tube is too wide to penetrate the=20 cribriform plate so there<BR>should be little reason to worry. I have = seen no=20 reports of cerebral<BR>intubation (!) ...</FONT></P><FONT size=3D2> <DT><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> =20 <DIV><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Marlow TJ</FONT><FONT = color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>.=20 </FONT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Goltra DD Jr</FONT><FONT = color=3D#ff0000=20 size=3D3>. </FONT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Schabel = SI</FONT><FONT=20 color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>.</FONT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 = size=3D3>(Department of=20 Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425,=20 USA.)<BR></FONT></DIV> <DT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3><STRONG>Intracranial placement of a = nasotracheal tube after facial fracture: a rare complication.</STRONG> = [see=20 Comment in: J Emerg Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;15(2):243-4 .]. [Review] </FONT> <DT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3></FONT>=20 <DT><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Journal of Emergency Medicine. = 15(2):187-91,=20 1997 Mar-Apr.<BR></FONT> <DT><FONT size=3D3><FONT color=3D#ff0000>Abstract </FONT></FONT> <DD><FONT color=3D#ff0000 size=3D3>Extensive facial trauma is often = associated=20 with fractures to the skull base, cribriform plate, and sphenoid = sinus.=20 Attempted intubation of patients with facial trauma may result in = intracranial=20 penetration and placement of nasogastric or nasotracheal tubes into = the brain.=20 Such a complication carries significant morbidity and mortality. = Intracranial=20 placement of nasogastric tubes has been reported multiple times in the = literature. Intracranial placement of a nasotracheal tube, however, = has been=20 reported only twice. Such a case is presented, along with a review of = the=20 literature and a discussion. [References: 12]<BR></FONT></FONT> <P><FONT size=3D2>and head injured patients routinely have nasal = intubation=20 in<BR>the intensive care unit.<BR>Tim.<BR>--<BR>Mr. T J = Coats<BR>Senior=20 Lecturer in Accident, Emergency and Pre-Hospital Care<BR>Bart's and = the Royal=20 London School of = Medicine<BR><BR></FONT></P></DD></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C201A4.065519E0--
- Previous message: Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment - with basilar skull fracture
- Next message: Initial trauma management in RTC entrapment -
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
