Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Bike helmets?...
Sheree Joyce trauma-list@trauma.orgTue, 21 May 2002 10:51:13 +1000
- Previous message: Bike helmets?...
- Next message: Bike helmets?...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--------------D25313DEA47C8226CCD64EB9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think the efficacy of the bike helmet is dependent upon various factors, particularly with kids. I often see kids wearing helmets in the sense that they have them perched on top of their heads, but the straps are not secured, thus making them next to useless. Also, the helmet needs to be the correct size so you aren't just providing them with a receptacle for their skulls to bounce around in. Impact speed, I think (could be totally wrong) is another factor. If you're hit at high speed on a bicycle, my experience is that the helmet doesn't offer much protection at all. I'm sure this will be refuted by many others, but that's a good thing. Sheree. Russ Pasley wrote: > I recently read an article in which the author has tried to refute the > wearing of bike helmets. He cites a study that claims it has never been > actually proven that they save lives. He says the study (which I tried to > find but couldn't) is based on the fact that in a bicylcist vs. auto, > pedestrian, bus, etc. accident, the type of collision is a very narrow one > in which the helmet will actually save a life or prevent serious head > injury. The study apparently is saying you are either toast or not toast > regardless of wether or not you have a helmet. That the number of lives > they save vs. the actual number of serious bike accidents is very minimal. > He also points out that very few Europeans wear bike helmets (is this true > european compatriots?) I find his claims hard to believe, but I won't > totally dismiss this until I've checked in for some feedback. I live in > San Francisco where there is a healthy number of bicyclists who commute by > bike and an unhealthy number of number of motor vehicles. Many cyclists do > not wear helmets ( though I would say most do), including some of my > friends whom I worry about. In your experience in dealing with bike > accidents do any of you have any thoughts or first hand experience on this. > Is this guy full of it? I apprecitate any replies. Common sense would say > this guy is way wrong, but I guess you never know. > > Sincerely, Russ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html --------------D25313DEA47C8226CCD64EB9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> I think the efficacy of the bike helmet is dependent upon various factors, particularly with kids. <br>I often see kids <i>wearing </i>helmets in the sense that they have them perched on top of their heads, but the straps are not secured, thus making them next to useless. <br>Also, the helmet needs to be the correct size so you aren't just providing them with a receptacle for their skulls to bounce around in. <br>Impact speed, I think (could be totally wrong) is another factor. If you're hit at high speed on a bicycle, my experience is that the helmet doesn't offer much protection at all. <br>I'm sure this will be refuted by many others, but that's a good thing. <br>Sheree. <p>Russ Pasley wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>I recently read an article in which the author has tried to refute the <br>wearing of bike helmets. He cites a study that claims it has never been <br>actually proven that they save lives. He says the study (which I tried to <br>find but couldn't) is based on the fact that in a bicylcist vs. auto, <br>pedestrian, bus, etc. accident, the type of collision is a very narrow one <br>in which the helmet will actually save a life or prevent serious head <br>injury. The study apparently is saying you are either toast or not toast <br>regardless of wether or not you have a helmet. That the number of lives <br>they save vs. the actual number of serious bike accidents is very minimal. <br>He also points out that very few Europeans wear bike helmets (is this true <br>european compatriots?) I find his claims hard to believe, but I won't <br>totally dismiss this until I've checked in for some feedback. I live in <br>San Francisco where there is a healthy number of bicyclists who commute by <br>bike and an unhealthy number of number of motor vehicles. Many cyclists do <br>not wear helmets ( though I would say most do), including some of my <br>friends whom I worry about. In your experience in dealing with bike <br>accidents do any of you have any thoughts or first hand experience on this. <br>Is this guy full of it? I apprecitate any replies. Common sense would say <br>this guy is way wrong, but I guess you never know. <p>Sincerely, Russ <p>-- <br>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <br>To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: <br><a href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/"http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html">http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html</a></blockquote> </html> --------------D25313DEA47C8226CCD64EB9--
- Previous message: Bike helmets?...
- Next message: Bike helmets?...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
