Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
trocar tube
david bleam trauma-list@trauma.orgMon, 06 May 2002 18:49:34 -0700
- Previous message: unsuscribe me
- Next message: To those who are never thanked sufficiently or enough
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello: Pardon my advanced medical ignorance; this device sounds like one I saw on a "TLC" program last week. This device was used by morticians/emblamers to puncture fluid holding organs prior to introduction of embalming fluid On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:50:04 +0930 "Cotton, Chris (SAAS)" <cotton.chris@saambulance.com.au> wrote: Ken, you put this response below to the ccm-l website and i thought it could be a good thread to discuss our recent topic of cardiac arrest management in trauma. David Crippen, i hope you don't mind me borrowing it. >>> <KMATTOX@AOL.COM> 04/25/02 08:48PM >>> "Trocar" chest tubes should be taken off the market as a dangerous device! Should the kinds of injuries which are in the literature, seen in EVERY hospital that looks for them, and produced by anyone who uses trocar chest tubes, regardless if they are surgeons, thoracic surgeons, paramedics, emergency physicians, intensivists, pediatricians, traumatologists, pulmonologists, or anyone else. If one has not seen iatrogenic injuries, including fatal air embolism, lung perforations, fatal hemorrhage, and malplacement into organs of the chest, abdomen, neck, and mediastinum in their personal or hospital practice where trocar chest tubes are purchased, they simply have not looked. One does not see what one does not look for. Since the resurrection of this discussion, I have contacted FDA that this dangerous device should be removed from manufacture and distribution in interstate commerce because of its iatrogenic injury potential. Those who used the "absolute" phrases regarding trocar chest tubes simple were not emphatic enough. I would strongly recommend that all who read this web site to go to their hospital stores and should any trocar chest tubes be found they should remove them from the shelves, take them to the desk of the h ospital administrator or chief of staff and request that the hospital send them back immediately. As an emergency physician, as a thoracic surgeon, as a traumatologist, as an intensivist and as one who reads some of the literature, contributes to some of it, I know of NO PLACE where the informed and caring physician would EVER use or recommend TROCAR chest tubes. They should be relegated to the curiosity section of the medical museum. I have seen either in the literature, court room, autopsy room, or operating room a puncture of the following organs by trocar chest tubes, most often by surgeons and thoracic surgeons who think they are immune from such iatrogenia because they know the anatomy: liver, colon, spleen, kidney, pancreas, stomach, diaphragm, heart, lung, thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, esophagus, trachea, thoracic duct. and others. Please, because, someday I may require health care in your hospital, and because someone on duty may in their judgment think that I need a chest tube, please, PLEASE remove all trocar chest tubes from your hospital, so that the rare uninformed physician does not have the opportunity to stab me. PS. The trocars work very nicely on the barbecue pit. k ------------------------------ Ok Ken ... you're sort of convincing me here - but what about a 12G dwellcaths through the 2nd intercostal space, mid clavicular line in an arrest patient due to suspected tension pneumothorax, or infact any trama involving the chest that ends up in an arrest? ... ideal management would NOT involve this? ... Ever? I'm looking for your guideance here - not criticisms - i am starting to recognise that behind your, at times abrupt manner, is a very swithched on man, so please explain yourself to me nicely; that way i'm more likely to take the time to be convinced by your arguments, coz it's a procedure that i still perform occasionally, when my clinical judgement leads me to suspect that it may have some benefit. If you can help me make the right decisions that are backed by reasonable argument and evidence, you'll change my practise...and that's a good thing for me because i'll pass that on to others. I know you'll think that is a good thing - disseminating good information. That is why we are all here - to share experience so others can learn and patients can benefit. ...and if you've got time, please give me your take again on volume resuscitation as it sits with you and the rationale for your stance - i'm interested to hear what you (and others) have to say. Regards, Chris Cotton, IC Paramedic South Australia -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: unsuscribe me
- Next message: To those who are never thanked sufficiently or enough
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
