Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Ethnocentrism - we should all be so lucky.
Greg Benton trauma-list@trauma.orgThu, 18 Apr 2002 08:33:54 +1000
- Previous message: I vote Doctors (was Guns or Doctors)
- Next message: Comparing countries.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Swimming lessons from drowning men? Hardly! In Australia I can walk down the street at night without fear of being mugged in the vast majority of places, a few exceptions in the capital cities. I can send my kids to school without fear that some kid is going to front up with a gun and start shooting his classmates. Fundamentally I live in a very safe place! We have mandatory seat belt and drink driving laws, gun ownership is controlled so that in the majority of cases it is a lot harder for crooks to get access to and carry a firearm. We don't have the same gang culture and we don't have drive by shootings, and most of our gang related conflicts are knife and baton type fights, no denying people are significantly injured in these, but not as many as would be with firearms involved. I don't think that's a glass house you are living in Jim its more like a crystal palace! We are still free, I own several firearms, and the process is not too odious to keep them, provided I meet certain sensible storage requirements. The police cannot legally enter our homes without a warrant unless they have reasonable cause, nor can they seize property without a warrant. As for the ban on knives, one could argue that the need to carry a flick or butterfly knife (especially in the city) is rather limited other than for dubious means, so why not make it illegal to conceal a dangerous weapon? Hardly leftist, more like sensible. Whilst I don't argue that the buy back was expensive, and that in many respects it went too far (I really miss my semi automatic beretta shotgun!). It has had a huge impact on the number of guns under beds in the community, legitimate shooters soon reallocated the funds and purchased legal replacements. If folks wanted to keep their guns, they could readily go through the process and obtain a shooters permit, again not too odious if you are a genuine sporting shooter. Lastly Crocodile Dundee is a fictional character, Rodney Ansel was just a guy, who when the armed police man said "stop or I'll shoot", he didn't..........clearly he was not the brightest crayon in the box. Some might argue its natural selection at work? Where did you get the man of the year bit from, I lived in the NT and have never heard of that award, it sounds decidedly propaganda'ish I'd love to know what the source information was. regards Greg Benton Nurse Unit Manager Emergency Department Wangaratta District Base Hospital Green St Wangaratta 3677 E-mail Greg.Benton@wdbh.hume.org.au Ph 03 57220162 Fax 03 57220236 -----Original Message----- From: James S Cowan [SMTP:jscowan10@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2002 5:28 To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: Ethnocentrism - we should all be so lucky. Interesting. Pointing to a monumental failure as an example. (swimming lessons from drowning men?) American citizens enjoy protections and freedoms not shared by most other countries. Australia for example. In the USA, a warrant is necessary before the police can enter a home and search for guns, copy the hard drive on your computer and seize records. Now you must have a reason to own a firearm and self or family protection is not considered a valid reason Yes, AU spent $500,000,000 on a program to buy back about 600,000 guns and in the process they reversed a downward trend in homicide with firearms and robbery among other things. It gets even more bizarre; in 1988 the leftist government even banned many types of knives. But all of this avoids the real harm done by the AU gun ban, the bastards killed Crocodile Dundee. Yes, that's right. Rodney William Ansel who inspired the movie was a rugged survivalist type. He was voted 1988 Man of the Year for AU's Northern Territory, He was no angel and had had run ins with the police but he was killed in a mysterious shoot out with the police which also killed a police sergeant over this issue. Yes, there is difference between the United States and many other countries. Despite the best efforts of the left, we are still free. Jim Cowan -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]On Behalf Of michael riordan Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:46 AM To: trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: enthnocentrism Guns,guns,Guns.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ What I cannot understand is that citizens of the US do not look at like societies for some sensible direction. What does Europe do? For instance? You go through such a circuitous and painful route to arrive at what many other countries did some years ago. Look at the reluctance to apply seat belt laws and blood alcohol restrictions for drivers. Because you (and we) are reluctant to protect the majority at the expense of individual rights. What therefore should the balance be? Here in OZ we have gun control and the vast majority of us accept it. Most of our society is urban,despite our vast area. Most of us do not need,nor want a gun. Despite having some politically volatile neighbours. We do not ban guns but place sensible restrictions on those who wish to own one. You need a purpose to own one (law enforcement,farmer, sporting shooter,security etc) and not be mentally ill, or otherwise legally undesirable. The police issue licences. Seems reasonable. Further more, those who own a gun must keep it under lock and key and the bullets away from the weapon. This tends to take the heat out of a domestic. Admittedly the people who wish to get a gun on the black market can. and always will. The bottom line is that we do not suffer the incidence of ballistic injury, unintentional nor intentional. they are a relative rarity, well, at least compared to the US. As for Liberalism,a much vaunted icon of all western societies, US included, is probably the historical fault of the current gun laws in the US,as it espouses the right of the individual. And Liberal(as in political party) is a dirty word. _____ This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and cleared by MailMarshal - For more information please contact Information Technology 57220380 or your local IT representative. ###################################################################### Attention: This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. ######################################################################
- Previous message: I vote Doctors (was Guns or Doctors)
- Next message: Comparing countries.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
