Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
Holmes John trauma-list@trauma.orgWed, 10 Apr 2002 16:41:00 +1000
- Previous message: Trauma Education
- Next message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
QED - Quod erat demonstrandum = Which was the thing to be proved. Used at the conclusion of a formal proof. In other words, in this case, your statement proved my original assertion. John ---------- From: James A. Johnson To: 'trauma-list@trauma.org' Subject: RE: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 9:08 I'm in America and have never heard of QED. EMS-Ts. here we have EMT- basic, EMT- advanced ( which depending on standing orders could put them at the paramedic level) and of course EMT-P. I also put this question to three anestisologist two preferred RSI and one preferred surgical. Again I'm not saying one is better than another, I just know what I'm comfortable doing and have done and was interested in what others had to say. Must say it got several off the political talk! Jim J > -----Original Message----- > From: Holmes John [SMTP:Jholmes@mater.org.au] > Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:26 PM > To: Jeremy Hawk > Cc: 'trauma-list@trauma.org' > Subject: RE: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field > > ...........To me, the question would be: Why would you RSI this patient? A > surgical cric would be faster and achieves the same goal - a secured > airway. > I might also think about a nasal tube if allowed and no absolute > contraindications (with OLMC if there are any questions). I feel that > there > is a place for RSI in the field, it's just that it's use must be carefully > considered, and appropriately place in the > realm of airway tools. Personally, I'd rather exhaust other options before > going to RSI........... > > This statement proves my point. QED. EMS-Ts are not adequately qualified > in > this field. To state that an invasive surgical procedure is preferable to > RSI is judgementally extremely flawed and very very scary. I challenge > you > to find one airways trained physician to agree with you. > > John L Holmes > Director Emergency Medicine > Mater Hospitals, Brisbane. > > > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html
- Previous message: Trauma Education
- Next message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
