Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Pre-hospital use of airway adjuncts
John & Rebecca Black trauma-list@trauma.orgThu, 4 Apr 2002 12:29:22 +0100
- Previous message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Next message: (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C1DBD4.595E5A70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim, It is critical to establish a patent airway and to deliver high flow oxyg= en to your patient as rapidly as possible. My approach to this on arrival= on scene, irrespective of whether you have the resources for RSI/paralyt= ic agents, would be to insert 2 nasopharyngeal airways (size 6.0 or 7.0) = if possible, an appropriate sized oral airway (not possible in your patie= nts because of trismus) and assisted ventilation with a BVM with reservoi= r and appropriately sized face mask. Even in the presence of vomitus, it = is usually possible to achieve some ventilation in this all too common si= tuation. Despite the views of the ACS, I do not consider a base of skull = fracture in this setting a contraindication to the use of nasal airway ad= juncts - it is essential that those inserting these adjuncts are adequate= ly trained in their use. Finally, if despite the above use of airway adjuncts, you cannot ventilat= e your patient with a BVM, cricothyroidotomy may need be considered as th= is may be the only route in which a definitive airway can be rapidly esta= blished before the patient becomes obtunded and looses their upper airway= reflexes. Once the latter has occurred, although endotracheal intubation= may be successful, the opportunity for survival may be lost. John Black Emergency Department John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK =20 Message: 15 From: "James A. Johnson" <J.Johnson@Valley-hosp.com> To: "'trauma-list@trauma.org'" <trauma-list@trauma.org> Subject: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:25:19 -0900 Reply-To: trauma-list@trauma.org I had a trauma pt with a closed head injury secondary to snowmachine accident. pt was unconscious/unresponsive, no other trauma noted pt resp. rate 32-34 irreg. pt jaw clamped. unable to call life flight due to weath= er. ground transport time code red 20-25 min. to a non trauma E.D. 5 mins. in= to transport pt began to show signs of posturing and started vomiting, pt ha= d to be rolled and suctioned but was unable to clear airway effectively. Pt then started to brady down to the 30 despite bvm assist. in our service a= s an EMTIII we are able to provide many advanced skills and we have progressive standing orders, however it's been a fight to get the sponsor= ing physician to allow paralytics in the field. stating he feels it may be misused in the out lying areas who have lower run volumes and weaker skil= ls. My thoughts are if they lack the skills don't let them use it, other thoughts from the paramedics I have spoken to feel a cric is preferred. I would rather use a short acting drug to allow me to tube than cut someone= 's throat, because I feel if the attempt is missed I can go back to the BVM, and oral airway. comments please. Jim Johnson EMT III Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.ms= n.com ------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C1DBD4.595E5A70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV> </DIV> <= DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Jim,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>It is critical to= establish a patent airway and to deliver high flow oxygen to your patien= t as rapidly as possible. My approach to this on arrival on scene, i= rrespective of whether you have the resources for RSI/paralytic agents, w= ould be to insert 2 nasopharyngeal airways (size 6.0 or 7.0) if poss= ible, an appropriate sized oral airway (not possible in your patient= s because of trismus) and assisted ventilation with a BVM with reservoir = and appropriately sized face mask. Even in the presence of vomitus, it is= usually possible to achieve some ventilation in this all too common situ= ation. Despite the views of the ACS, I do not consider a base of sku= ll fracture in this setting a contraindication to the use of nasal airway= adjuncts - it is essential that those inserting these adjuncts are adequ= ately trained in their use.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Finally, if desp= ite the above use of airway adjuncts, you cannot ventilate your patient w= ith a BVM, cricothyroidotomy may need be considered as this may= be the only route in which a definitive airway can be rapidly estab= lished before the patient becomes obtunded and looses their upper airway = reflexes. Once the latter has occurred, although endotracheal intubation = may be successful, the opportunity for survival may be lost.</DIV> <DIV>&= nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>John Black</DIV> <DIV>Emergency Department</DIV> <DIV>Jo= hn Radcliffe Hospital</DIV> <DIV>Oxford UK </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> = <DIV>Message: 15<BR>From: "James A. Johnson" <J.Johnson@Valley-hosp.co= m><BR>To: "'trauma-list@trauma.org'" <trauma-list@trauma.org><BR= >Subject: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field<BR>Date: Tu= e, 2 Apr 2002 15:25:19 -0900<BR>Reply-To: trauma-list@trauma.org<BR><BR>I= had a trauma pt with a closed head injury secondary to snowmachine<BR>ac= cident. pt was unconscious/unresponsive, no other trauma noted pt resp.<B= R>rate 32-34 irreg. pt jaw clamped. unable to call life flight due to wea= ther.<BR>ground transport time code red 20-25 min. to a non trauma E.D. 5= mins. into<BR>transport pt began to show signs of posturing and started = vomiting, pt had<BR>to be rolled and suctioned but was unable to clear ai= rway effectively. Pt<BR>then started to brady down to the 30 despite bvm = assist. in our service as<BR>an EMTIII we are able to provide many = advanced skills and we have<BR>progressive standing orders, however it's = been a fight to get the sponsoring<BR>physician to allow paralytics in th= e field. stating he feels it may be<BR>misused in the out lying areas who= have lower run volumes and weaker skills.<BR>My thoughts are if they lac= k the skills don't let them use it, other<BR>thoughts from the paramedics= I have spoken to feel a cric is preferred. I<BR>would rather use a short= acting drug to allow me to tube than cut someone's<BR>throat, because I = feel if the attempt is missed I can go back to the BVM,<BR>and oral airwa= y. comments please.<BR><BR>Jim Johnson EMT III<BR></DIV> <DIV>  = ;</DIV> <DIV><BR><BR> </DIV></BODY></HTML><br clear=3Dall><hr>Get mo= re from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : <a href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/3D'http://explorer= .msn.com'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p> ------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C1DBD4.595E5A70--
- Previous message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Next message: (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
