Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
James A. Johnson trauma-list@trauma.orgTue, 2 Apr 2002 15:25:19 -0900
- Previous message: Trauma vs. Politics
- Next message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I had a trauma pt with a closed head injury secondary to snowmachine accident. pt was unconscious/unresponsive, no other trauma noted pt resp. rate 32-34 irreg. pt jaw clamped. unable to call life flight due to weather. ground transport time code red 20-25 min. to a non trauma E.D. 5 mins. into transport pt began to show signs of posturing and started vomiting, pt had to be rolled and suctioned but was unable to clear airway effectively. Pt then started to brady down to the 30 despite bvm assist. in our service as an EMTIII we are able to provide many advanced skills and we have progressive standing orders, however it's been a fight to get the sponsoring physician to allow paralytics in the field. stating he feels it may be misused in the out lying areas who have lower run volumes and weaker skills. My thoughts are if they lack the skills don't let them use it, other thoughts from the paramedics I have spoken to feel a cric is preferred. I would rather use a short acting drug to allow me to tube than cut someone's throat, because I feel if the attempt is missed I can go back to the BVM, and oral airway. comments please. Jim Johnson EMT III
- Previous message: Trauma vs. Politics
- Next message: paralytics vs. surgical cricothorotomy in the field
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
