Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify Your Subscription

Modify

Home > List Archives

A return to GCS and intoxication

Nick Nudell trauma-list@trauma.org
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:05:49 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0074_01C1C0A4.148F7500
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good question. I believe that only 500 was infused PRIOR to arrival and =
the other 200 happened between arrival and anyone in the ED actually =
making an effort to adjust the rate... 300-500 is a standard fluid bolus =
in our system. In considering the possible etiologies, a fluid bolus =
should not hurt and may be helpful (ok, let 'em rip)....

(I was not monitoring the fluid but I believe this to be the case)

Nick


____
Nick Nudell, NREMT-P
Glacier County EMS
www.glacierems.com
Northern Rockies Medical Center
Cut Bank, MT
nick@glacierems.com



  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: P. Hoffman=20
  To: trauma-list@trauma.org=20
  Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:05 PM
  Subject: RE: A return to GCS and intoxication


  At the risk of exposing my ignorance, what was the purpose of so much =
fluid pre-hospital?

  Phil Hoffman
  EMTP
    -----Original Message-----
    From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org =
[mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]On Behalf Of Nick Nudell
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:27 PM
    To: trauma-list@trauma.org
    Subject: Re: A return to GCS and intoxication


    Here is a prehospital scenario....

    45 yo NAM, bystanders state pt was sitting in a chair and just went =
limp with head falling back, not responding. I find avpU, GCS=3D3, =
normopneic, SPO2=3D100%, tachycardic, skin PWM, sinus tach no ectopy, BP =
slightly elevated, D-stick=3D127mg/dl. Start a line, begin infusing =
fluid & hi flow O2, with no response to treatment. Narcan 2mg with no =
response, Thiamine 100mg again no response, Dextrose 12.5g with no =
response. This pt is someone we know as a homeless person who is =
normally intoxicated. No strong odor of ETOH is present, unusually.

    Now comes the extrication from the small upstairs apartment via =
LBB/straps.  Attempt to place an OPA, noting stiff jaw and some oral =
resistance (indicating possibly a gag reflex), so that attempt is DCd =
and an NPA is placed without complication. On the way to the ED a second =
IV is established and 700cc are infused enroute. At ED no changes. Dr =
considers intubation but decides to wait, with suction on standby. =
Romazicon was also considered but decided against barring positive Tox =
results.

    A 'little' while later labs come back indicating negative TOX screen =
findings and ETOH level +400. DDx, alcohol toxicity. It took a couple =
hours and several liters of fluid to wake him up...

    Enroute, I have absolutely no way of knowing if this person has had =
0, 1, or 100 drinks. I can only indicate that his GCS=3D3 so he is avpU. =
I cannot rule out stroke, cardiac complications, hypoxic conditions, =
diabetic complications or trauma. Is not this what GCS is for? Other =
then just describing the s/s of the pt (which you can do for anyone- who =
really needs the GCS?) I gave the appropriate GCS for this pt.=20

    It is now up to the Dr to make a diagnosis as to what has actually =
happened. ANY Dr or Nurse or Paramedic who relies on someone else's =
assessment of a patient for their direct treatment should take =
responsibility for this action (IMHO).

    Nick



    ____
    Nick Nudell, NREMT-P
    Glacier County EMS
    www.glacierems.com
    Northern Rockies Medical Center
    Cut Bank, MT
    nick@glacierems.com


    =20
      ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: canes=20
      To: trauma-list@trauma.org=20
      Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:32 AM
      Subject: A return to GCS and intoxication



      Right, here go my thoughts, after reading yours with amusement and =
amazement for several days: (mine are the bits in brackets)

      Sheree Joyce wrote:
      Is it possible to complete a comprehensive GCS on a pt who is =
chemically
      paralysed??

      And Pret replied:
      No.  And "7T" or "3P" is useless, diagnostically, prognostically, =
and
      descriptively.  These terms have identical meaning: "all bets are =
off."

      For acute care purposes, it should suffice to inform clinicians =
that the
      patient is chemically disqualified from coma assessment: they'll =
have to
      assume the worst, or prove otherwise by discontinuing the =
paralysis.  As has
      been discussed, however, it is important for the 'upstream' =
clinician to
      carefully observe and record a GCS prior to sedation and/or =
paralysis.  It's
      very useful for the receiving physician to know whether or not the =
patient
      was comatose, had airway jeopardy, or was simply too combative to =
treat
      otherwise.
      Pret

      (.....Well, this all brings me back to my question about nursing =
management of self-medicated people who possibly have a head injury. =
Those who have taken an overdose, either of ETOH, or some other sedating =
medication, are effectively CHEMICALLY PARALYSED. If they do not =
actually have respiratory impairment, (which would obviously require =
intubation, before someone points this out)  they are often so flacid as =
to render the motor part of the assessment meaningless. Their cognitive =
responses are affected by the chemical CNS depressants in their system, =
so it is impossible to properly assess any change in head injury status, =
(not even going into those who simply don't want to cooperate) and of =
course none of them open their eyes spontaneously. Basic BP (I'll =
explain the systolic/diastolic thing to you another time Pret!!!) may =
show the pulse widening evident in an expanding subdural haematoma, but =
in theory, in a level 3 care facility a CT will already have been done =
which will have proved or ruled out significant head injury. So, given =
all this, how do we, as nurses, accurately keep a tab on the patients =
evolving condition in a meaningful way? The medical answer at the place =
I work is to require nurses to continue half to one hourly GCS =
recordings, despite the above problems with this. I just wondered if =
anyone else had any revolutionary new ways of treatment or assessment =
that would help us manage intoxicated patients who have the possibility =
of underlying head injury. (which, as someone pointed out, could be all =
of them, due to the inherent difficulties in the initial assessment. I'm =
sorry to be a little long-winded, but having read what some of you =
write, I don't want to be misinterpreted!)

      JL Holmes wrote:
      The problem with GCS is that, as with all scoring systems, the =
details
      become forgotten unless one is using it frequently. =20

      (....Very true, but that is what the posters on the wall are =
for....)

      In the heat of battle the occasional user struggles.  I have to =
admit that I get rather annoyed
      when I am presented a patient who is said to have a GCS of "about =
7". =20

      (... what about the difficult to asses patient whose GCS changes =
from minute to minute due to the action of drugs and or alcohol on their =
state of consciousness and their cooperativeness...?)

      A GCS is an absolute score or it's not been properly assessed.=20

      (...Hmmm...)

       Further - an inaccurate GCS (or vaguely guessed at GCS) has great =
potential for harm if
      it is relied upon when looking for trends.
      (... yes, but that is what staff education is for, and before =
anyone else claims that their nursing or medical staff are unable to =
learn how to do an accurate GCS recording, I would like to point out =
that gives the rest of us a very low opinion of the caliber of staff =
whom you employ)

      Finally:
       Is it really necessary to have a GCS to know when to intubate?  I =
hear
      this quite often.
      > Daryl Eustace, EMT-P
      I agree. Strictly of the neurological point of view, a patient who =
does not
      attend to a simple verbal command should be intubated. I need not =
the
      Glasgow's Scale for this.
      Hermeto, MV
      Coordinator - Physician
      SAMU - Betim
      Brazil
      (...The use of GCS before intubation is to give an accurate =
picture of the patient's condition, and it goes with all the other =
evaluations and recordings taken  to acheive an accurate baseline. You =
might as well say that you don't need a blood pressure to tell that a =
patient is exanguinating through femoral wound )... this completely =
misses the point of doing the BP or any recording at all. With this =
attitude, we might just as well all go home and let the patients treat =
themselves)
      Enough from me,
      Ali Cane (RCpN)=20

------=_NextPart_000_0074_01C1C0A4.148F7500
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Good question. I believe that only 500 =
was infused=20
PRIOR to arrival and the other 200 happened between arrival and anyone =
in the ED=20
actually making an effort to adjust the rate... 300-500 is a standard =
fluid=20
bolus in our system. In&nbsp;considering the possible etiologies, a =
fluid bolus=20
should not hurt and may be helpful (ok, let 'em rip)....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>(I was not monitoring the fluid but I =
believe this=20
to be the case)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Nick</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>____<BR>Nick Nudell, NREMT-P<BR>Glacier County EMS<BR><A=20
href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/3D"http://www.glacierems.com">www.glacierems.com</A><BR>Northern =
Rockies=20
Medical Center<BR>Cut Bank, MT<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:nick@glacierems.com">nick@glacierems.com</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dphoffman@freeway.net =
href=3D"mailto:phoffman@freeway.net">P.=20
  Hoffman</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20
  href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 28, =
2002 1:05=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: A return to GCS =
and=20
  intoxication</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D720160420-28022002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>At=20
  the risk of exposing my ignorance, what was the purpose of so much =
fluid=20
  pre-hospital?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D720160420-28022002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D720160420-28022002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Phil=20
  Hoffman</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D720160420-28022002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff=20
  size=3D2>EMTP</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
    size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> <A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org">trauma-list-admin@trauma.org=
</A>=20
    [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Nick=20
    Nudell<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:27 =
PM<BR><B>To:</B> <A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A><BR><B>S=
ubject:</B>=20
    Re: A return to GCS and intoxication<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Here is a prehospital=20
scenario....</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>45 yo NAM, bystanders state pt was =
sitting in=20
    a chair and just went limp with head falling back, not responding. I =
find=20
    avpU, GCS=3D3, normopneic, SPO2=3D100%, tachycardic, skin PWM, sinus =
tach no=20
    ectopy, BP slightly elevated, D-stick=3D127mg/dl. Start a line, =
begin infusing=20
    fluid &amp;&nbsp;hi flow O2, with no response to treatment. Narcan=20
    2mg&nbsp;with no response, Thiamine 100mg again no response, =
Dextrose 12.5g=20
    with no response. This pt is someone we know as a homeless person =
who is=20
    normally intoxicated. No strong odor of ETOH is present,=20
    unusually.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Now comes the extrication from the =
small=20
    upstairs apartment via LBB/straps.&nbsp; Attempt to place an OPA, =
noting=20
    stiff jaw and some oral resistance (indicating possibly a gag =
reflex), so=20
    that attempt is DCd and an NPA is placed without complication. On =
the way to=20
    the ED a second IV is established and 700cc are infused enroute. At =
ED no=20
    changes. Dr considers intubation but decides to wait, with suction =
on=20
    standby. Romazicon was also considered but decided against barring =
positive=20
    Tox results.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>A 'little' while later labs come =
back=20
    indicating negative TOX screen findings and ETOH level +400. DDx, =
alcohol=20
    toxicity. It took a couple hours and several liters of fluid to wake =
him=20
    up...</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Enroute, I have absolutely no way =
of knowing=20
    if this person has had 0, 1, or 100 drinks. I can only indicate that =
his=20
    GCS=3D3&nbsp;so he is avpU. I cannot rule out stroke, cardiac =
complications,=20
    hypoxic&nbsp;conditions, diabetic complications or trauma. Is not =
this what=20
    GCS is for? Other then just describing the s/s of the pt (which you =
can do=20
    for anyone- who really needs the GCS?) I gave the appropriate GCS =
for this=20
    pt. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>It is now up to the Dr to make a =
diagnosis as=20
    to what has actually happened. ANY Dr or Nurse or Paramedic&nbsp;who =
relies=20
    on someone else's assessment of a patient for their direct treatment =
should=20
    take responsibility for this action (IMHO).</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Nick</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>____<BR>Nick Nudell, =
NREMT-P<BR>Glacier County=20
    EMS<BR><A=20
    =
href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/3D"http://www.glacierems.com">www.glacierems.com</A><BR>Northern =
Rockies=20
    Medical Center<BR>Cut Bank, MT<BR><A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:nick@glacierems.com">nick@glacierems.com</A></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
      <DIV=20
      style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
      <A title=3Dcanes@xtra.co.nz =
href=3D"mailto:canes@xtra.co.nz">canes</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20
      href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A> =
</DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February =
28, 2002=20
      1:32 AM</DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> A return to GCS =
and=20
      intoxication</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
size=3D3><FONT=20
      face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3><BR><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>Right, here go=20
      my thoughts, after reading yours with amusement and amazement for =
several=20
      days: (mine are the bits in=20
brackets)</FONT><BR></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
      size=3D3><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3><FONT =
face=3DArial size=3D2>Sheree=20
      Joyce wrote:</FONT><BR>Is it possible to complete a comprehensive =
GCS on a=20
      pt who is chemically<BR>paralysed??</FONT><BR><BR>And Pret=20
      replied:</FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
size=3D3>No.&nbsp;=20
      And "7T" or "3P" is useless, diagnostically, prognostically,=20
      and<BR>descriptively.&nbsp; These terms have identical meaning: =
"all bets=20
      are off."<BR><BR>For acute care purposes, it should suffice to =
inform=20
      clinicians that the<BR>patient is chemically disqualified from =
coma=20
      assessment: they'll have to<BR>assume the worst, or prove =
otherwise by=20
      discontinuing the paralysis.&nbsp; As has<BR>been discussed, =
however, it=20
      is important for the 'upstream' clinician to<BR>carefully observe =
and=20
      record a GCS prior to sedation and/or paralysis.&nbsp; =
It's<BR>very useful=20
      for the receiving physician to know whether or not the =
patient<BR>was=20
      comatose, had airway jeopardy, or was simply too combative to=20
      treat<BR>otherwise.<BR>Pret<BR><FONT face=3DArial=20
      size=3D2></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
size=3D3><FONT=20
      face=3DArial size=3D2>(.....Well, this all brings me back to my =
question about=20
      <EM>nursing</EM> management of self-medicated people who possibly =
have a=20
      head injury.&nbsp;Those who have taken an overdose, either of =
ETOH, or=20
      some other sedating medication, are effectively CHEMICALLY =
PARALYSED. If=20
      they do not actually have respiratory impairment, (which would =
obviously=20
      require intubation, before someone points this out) &nbsp;they are =
often=20
      so flacid as to render the motor part of the assessment =
meaningless. Their=20
      cognitive responses are affected by the chemical CNS depressants =
in their=20
      system, so it is impossible to properly assess any&nbsp;change in =
head=20
      injury status, (not even going&nbsp;into those who&nbsp;simply =
don't want=20
      to cooperate)&nbsp;and of course none of them open their eyes=20
      spontaneously. Basic&nbsp;BP (I'll explain the systolic/diastolic =
thing to=20
      you another time Pret!!!) may show the pulse widening evident in =
an=20
      expanding subdural haematoma, but in theory, in a level 3 care =
facility a=20
      CT will already have been done which will have proved or ruled out =

      significant head injury. So, given all this, how do we, as nurses, =

      accurately keep a tab on the patients evolving condition in a =
meaningful=20
      way? The medical answer at the place I work is to =
require&nbsp;nurses to=20
      continue half to one hourly GCS recordings, despite the above =
problems=20
      with this. I just wondered if anyone else had any revolutionary =
new ways=20
      of treatment or assessment that would help us manage intoxicated =
patients=20
      who have the possibility of underlying head injury. (which, as =
someone=20
      pointed out, <EM>could</EM> be all of them, due to the inherent=20
      difficulties in the initial assessment. I'm sorry to be a little=20
      long-winded, but having read what some of you write, I don't want =
to be=20
      misinterpreted!)</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
      size=3D3></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=3D+0><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>JL Holmes=20
      wrote:</FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>The problem with GCS is that, as with all scoring systems, =
the=20
      details<BR>become forgotten unless one is using it =
frequently.&nbsp;=20
</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>(....Very true, but that is what the posters on the wall are=20
      for....)</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>In the heat of battle the occasional user struggles.&nbsp; I =
have to=20
      admit that I get rather annoyed<BR>when I am presented a patient =
who is=20
      said to have a GCS of "about 7".&nbsp; </DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(... what about the difficult to =
asses=20
      patient whose GCS changes from minute to minute due to the action =
of drugs=20
      and or alcohol on their state of consciousness and their=20
      cooperativeness...?)</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>A GCS is an absolute score or it's not been properly=20
      assessed.&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>(...Hmmm...)</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;Further - an inaccurate GCS (or vaguely guessed at GCS) =
has=20
      great potential for harm if<BR>it is relied upon when looking for=20
      trends.<BR><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(... yes, but that is what =
staff=20
      education is for, and before anyone else claims that their nursing =
or=20
      medical staff are unable to learn how to do an accurate GCS =
recording, I=20
      would like to point out that gives the rest of us a very low =
opinion of=20
      the caliber of staff whom you employ)</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Finally:</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;Is it really necessary to have a GCS to know when to=20
      intubate?&nbsp; I hear<BR>this quite often.<BR>&gt; Daryl Eustace, =

      EMT-P<BR>I agree. Strictly of the neurological point of view, a =
patient=20
      who does not<BR>attend to a simple verbal command should be =
intubated. I=20
      need not the<BR>Glasgow's Scale for this.<BR>Hermeto, =
MV<BR>Coordinator -=20
      Physician<BR>SAMU - Betim<BR>Brazil<BR><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>(...The use=20
      of GCS before intubation is to give an accurate picture of the =
patient's=20
      condition, and it goes with all the other evaluations&nbsp;and =
recordings=20
      taken&nbsp; to&nbsp;acheive an accurate baseline. You might as =
well say=20
      that you don't need a blood pressure to tell that a patient is=20
      exanguinating through femoral wound )... this completely misses =
the point=20
      of doing the BP or any recording at all. With this attitude, we =
might just=20
      as well all go home and let the patients treat =
themselves)</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Enough from me,</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ali Cane=20
  =
(RCpN)</FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></=
HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0074_01C1C0A4.148F7500--