Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
A return to GCS and intoxication
Nick Nudell trauma-list@trauma.orgThu, 28 Feb 2002 10:26:49 -0700
- Previous message: A return to GCS and intoxication
- Next message: A return to GCS and intoxication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C1C042.6E8885E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is a prehospital scenario.... 45 yo NAM, bystanders state pt was sitting in a chair and just went limp = with head falling back, not responding. I find avpU, GCS=3D3, = normopneic, SPO2=3D100%, tachycardic, skin PWM, sinus tach no ectopy, BP = slightly elevated, D-stick=3D127mg/dl. Start a line, begin infusing = fluid & hi flow O2, with no response to treatment. Narcan 2mg with no = response, Thiamine 100mg again no response, Dextrose 12.5g with no = response. This pt is someone we know as a homeless person who is = normally intoxicated. No strong odor of ETOH is present, unusually. Now comes the extrication from the small upstairs apartment via = LBB/straps. Attempt to place an OPA, noting stiff jaw and some oral = resistance (indicating possibly a gag reflex), so that attempt is DCd = and an NPA is placed without complication. On the way to the ED a second = IV is established and 700cc are infused enroute. At ED no changes. Dr = considers intubation but decides to wait, with suction on standby. = Romazicon was also considered but decided against barring positive Tox = results. A 'little' while later labs come back indicating negative TOX screen = findings and ETOH level +400. DDx, alcohol toxicity. It took a couple = hours and several liters of fluid to wake him up... Enroute, I have absolutely no way of knowing if this person has had 0, = 1, or 100 drinks. I can only indicate that his GCS=3D3 so he is avpU. I = cannot rule out stroke, cardiac complications, hypoxic conditions, = diabetic complications or trauma. Is not this what GCS is for? Other = then just describing the s/s of the pt (which you can do for anyone- who = really needs the GCS?) I gave the appropriate GCS for this pt.=20 It is now up to the Dr to make a diagnosis as to what has actually = happened. ANY Dr or Nurse or Paramedic who relies on someone else's = assessment of a patient for their direct treatment should take = responsibility for this action (IMHO). Nick ____ Nick Nudell, NREMT-P Glacier County EMS www.glacierems.com Northern Rockies Medical Center Cut Bank, MT nick@glacierems.com ----- Original Message -----=20 From: canes=20 To: trauma-list@trauma.org=20 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:32 AM Subject: A return to GCS and intoxication Right, here go my thoughts, after reading yours with amusement and = amazement for several days: (mine are the bits in brackets) Sheree Joyce wrote: Is it possible to complete a comprehensive GCS on a pt who is = chemically paralysed?? And Pret replied: No. And "7T" or "3P" is useless, diagnostically, prognostically, and descriptively. These terms have identical meaning: "all bets are = off." For acute care purposes, it should suffice to inform clinicians that = the patient is chemically disqualified from coma assessment: they'll have = to assume the worst, or prove otherwise by discontinuing the paralysis. = As has been discussed, however, it is important for the 'upstream' clinician = to carefully observe and record a GCS prior to sedation and/or paralysis. = It's very useful for the receiving physician to know whether or not the = patient was comatose, had airway jeopardy, or was simply too combative to = treat otherwise. Pret (.....Well, this all brings me back to my question about nursing = management of self-medicated people who possibly have a head injury. = Those who have taken an overdose, either of ETOH, or some other sedating = medication, are effectively CHEMICALLY PARALYSED. If they do not = actually have respiratory impairment, (which would obviously require = intubation, before someone points this out) they are often so flacid as = to render the motor part of the assessment meaningless. Their cognitive = responses are affected by the chemical CNS depressants in their system, = so it is impossible to properly assess any change in head injury status, = (not even going into those who simply don't want to cooperate) and of = course none of them open their eyes spontaneously. Basic BP (I'll = explain the systolic/diastolic thing to you another time Pret!!!) may = show the pulse widening evident in an expanding subdural haematoma, but = in theory, in a level 3 care facility a CT will already have been done = which will have proved or ruled out significant head injury. So, given = all this, how do we, as nurses, accurately keep a tab on the patients = evolving condition in a meaningful way? The medical answer at the place = I work is to require nurses to continue half to one hourly GCS = recordings, despite the above problems with this. I just wondered if = anyone else had any revolutionary new ways of treatment or assessment = that would help us manage intoxicated patients who have the possibility = of underlying head injury. (which, as someone pointed out, could be all = of them, due to the inherent difficulties in the initial assessment. I'm = sorry to be a little long-winded, but having read what some of you = write, I don't want to be misinterpreted!) JL Holmes wrote: The problem with GCS is that, as with all scoring systems, the details become forgotten unless one is using it frequently. =20 (....Very true, but that is what the posters on the wall are for....) In the heat of battle the occasional user struggles. I have to admit = that I get rather annoyed when I am presented a patient who is said to have a GCS of "about 7". = (... what about the difficult to asses patient whose GCS changes from = minute to minute due to the action of drugs and or alcohol on their = state of consciousness and their cooperativeness...?) A GCS is an absolute score or it's not been properly assessed.=20 (...Hmmm...) Further - an inaccurate GCS (or vaguely guessed at GCS) has great = potential for harm if it is relied upon when looking for trends. (... yes, but that is what staff education is for, and before anyone = else claims that their nursing or medical staff are unable to learn how = to do an accurate GCS recording, I would like to point out that gives = the rest of us a very low opinion of the caliber of staff whom you = employ) Finally: Is it really necessary to have a GCS to know when to intubate? I = hear this quite often. > Daryl Eustace, EMT-P I agree. Strictly of the neurological point of view, a patient who = does not attend to a simple verbal command should be intubated. I need not the Glasgow's Scale for this. Hermeto, MV Coordinator - Physician SAMU - Betim Brazil (...The use of GCS before intubation is to give an accurate picture of = the patient's condition, and it goes with all the other evaluations and = recordings taken to acheive an accurate baseline. You might as well say = that you don't need a blood pressure to tell that a patient is = exanguinating through femoral wound )... this completely misses the = point of doing the BP or any recording at all. With this attitude, we = might just as well all go home and let the patients treat themselves) Enough from me, Ali Cane (RCpN)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C1C042.6E8885E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Here is a prehospital = scenario....</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>45 yo NAM, bystanders state pt was = sitting in a=20 chair and just went limp with head falling back, not responding. I find = avpU,=20 GCS=3D3, normopneic, SPO2=3D100%, tachycardic, skin PWM, sinus tach no = ectopy, BP=20 slightly elevated, D-stick=3D127mg/dl. Start a line, begin infusing = fluid=20 & hi flow O2, with no response to treatment. Narcan = 2mg with no=20 response, Thiamine 100mg again no response, Dextrose 12.5g with no = response.=20 This pt is someone we know as a homeless person who is normally = intoxicated. No=20 strong odor of ETOH is present, unusually.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Now comes the extrication from the = small upstairs=20 apartment via LBB/straps. Attempt to place an OPA, noting stiff = jaw and=20 some oral resistance (indicating possibly a gag reflex), so that attempt = is DCd=20 and an NPA is placed without complication. On the way to the ED a second = IV is=20 established and 700cc are infused enroute. At ED no changes. Dr = considers=20 intubation but decides to wait, with suction on standby. Romazicon was = also=20 considered but decided against barring positive Tox = results.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>A 'little' while later labs come back = indicating=20 negative TOX screen findings and ETOH level +400. DDx, alcohol toxicity. = It took=20 a couple hours and several liters of fluid to wake him = up...</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Enroute, I have absolutely no way of = knowing if=20 this person has had 0, 1, or 100 drinks. I can only indicate that his=20 GCS=3D3 so he is avpU. I cannot rule out stroke, cardiac = complications,=20 hypoxic conditions, diabetic complications or trauma. Is not this = what GCS=20 is for? Other then just describing the s/s of the pt (which you can do = for=20 anyone- who really needs the GCS?) I gave the appropriate GCS for this = pt.=20 </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>It is now up to the Dr to make a = diagnosis as to=20 what has actually happened. ANY Dr or Nurse or Paramedic who relies = on=20 someone else's assessment of a patient for their direct treatment should = take=20 responsibility for this action (IMHO).</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Nick</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>____<BR>Nick Nudell, NREMT-P<BR>Glacier = County=20 EMS<BR><A = href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/3D"http://www.glacierems.com">www.glacierems.com</A><BR>Northern=20 Rockies Medical Center<BR>Cut Bank, MT<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:nick@glacierems.com">nick@glacierems.com</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dcanes@xtra.co.nz href=3D"mailto:canes@xtra.co.nz">canes</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20 href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 28, = 2002 1:32=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> A return to GCS and=20 intoxication</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" = size=3D3><FONT=20 face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3><BR><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>Right, here go my=20 thoughts, after reading yours with amusement and amazement for several = days:=20 (mine are the bits in brackets)</FONT><BR></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New = Roman"=20 size=3D3><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>Sheree=20 Joyce wrote:</FONT><BR>Is it possible to complete a comprehensive GCS = on a pt=20 who is chemically<BR>paralysed??</FONT><BR><BR>And Pret=20 replied:</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" = size=3D3>No. And=20 "7T" or "3P" is useless, diagnostically, prognostically,=20 and<BR>descriptively. These terms have identical meaning: "all = bets are=20 off."<BR><BR>For acute care purposes, it should suffice to inform = clinicians=20 that the<BR>patient is chemically disqualified from coma assessment: = they'll=20 have to<BR>assume the worst, or prove otherwise by discontinuing the=20 paralysis. As has<BR>been discussed, however, it is important = for the=20 'upstream' clinician to<BR>carefully observe and record a GCS prior to = sedation and/or paralysis. It's<BR>very useful for the receiving = physician to know whether or not the patient<BR>was comatose, had = airway=20 jeopardy, or was simply too combative to = treat<BR>otherwise.<BR>Pret<BR><FONT=20 face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" = size=3D3><FONT=20 face=3DArial size=3D2>(.....Well, this all brings me back to my = question about=20 <EM>nursing</EM> management of self-medicated people who possibly have = a head=20 injury. Those who have taken an overdose, either of ETOH, or some = other=20 sedating medication, are effectively CHEMICALLY PARALYSED. If they do = not=20 actually have respiratory impairment, (which would obviously require=20 intubation, before someone points this out) they are often so = flacid as=20 to render the motor part of the assessment meaningless. Their = cognitive=20 responses are affected by the chemical CNS depressants in their = system, so it=20 is impossible to properly assess any change in head injury = status, (not=20 even going into those who simply don't want to = cooperate) and=20 of course none of them open their eyes spontaneously. Basic BP = (I'll=20 explain the systolic/diastolic thing to you another time Pret!!!) may = show the=20 pulse widening evident in an expanding subdural haematoma, but in = theory, in a=20 level 3 care facility a CT will already have been done which will have = proved=20 or ruled out significant head injury. So, given all this, how do we, = as=20 nurses, accurately keep a tab on the patients evolving condition in a=20 meaningful way? The medical answer at the place I work is to=20 require nurses to continue half to one hourly GCS recordings, = despite the=20 above problems with this. I just wondered if anyone else had any = revolutionary=20 new ways of treatment or assessment that would help us manage = intoxicated=20 patients who have the possibility of underlying head injury. (which, = as=20 someone pointed out, <EM>could</EM> be all of them, due to the = inherent=20 difficulties in the initial assessment. I'm sorry to be a little = long-winded,=20 but having read what some of you write, I don't want to be=20 misinterpreted!)</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman"=20 size=3D3></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D+0><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>JL Holmes=20 wrote:</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV>The problem with GCS is that, as with all scoring systems, the=20 details<BR>become forgotten unless one is using it frequently. = </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>(....Very true, but that is what the posters on the wall are=20 for....)</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>In the heat of battle the occasional user struggles. I have = to=20 admit that I get rather annoyed<BR>when I am presented a patient who = is said=20 to have a GCS of "about 7". </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(... what about the difficult to = asses patient=20 whose GCS changes from minute to minute due to the action of drugs and = or=20 alcohol on their state of consciousness and their=20 cooperativeness...?)</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>A GCS is an absolute score or it's not been properly=20 assessed. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>(...Hmmm...)</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> Further - an inaccurate GCS (or vaguely guessed at GCS) has = great=20 potential for harm if<BR>it is relied upon when looking for = trends.<BR><FONT=20 face=3DArial size=3D2>(... yes, but that is what staff education is = for, and=20 before anyone else claims that their nursing or medical staff are = unable to=20 learn how to do an accurate GCS recording, I would like to point out = that=20 gives the rest of us a very low opinion of the caliber of staff whom = you=20 employ)</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Finally:</FONT></DIV> <DIV> Is it really necessary to have a GCS to know when to=20 intubate? I hear<BR>this quite often.<BR>> Daryl Eustace, = EMT-P<BR>I=20 agree. Strictly of the neurological point of view, a patient who does=20 not<BR>attend to a simple verbal command should be intubated. I need = not=20 the<BR>Glasgow's Scale for this.<BR>Hermeto, MV<BR>Coordinator -=20 Physician<BR>SAMU - Betim<BR>Brazil<BR><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>(...The use of=20 GCS before intubation is to give an accurate picture of the patient's=20 condition, and it goes with all the other evaluations and = recordings=20 taken to acheive an accurate baseline. You might as well = say that=20 you don't need a blood pressure to tell that a patient is = exanguinating=20 through femoral wound )... this completely misses the point of doing = the BP or=20 any recording at all. With this attitude, we might just as well all go = home=20 and let the patients treat themselves)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Enough from me,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ali Cane=20 (RCpN)</FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C1C042.6E8885E0--
- Previous message: A return to GCS and intoxication
- Next message: A return to GCS and intoxication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
