Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Spinal Immobilization question
Bjorn, Pret trauma-list@trauma.orgMon, 4 Feb 2002 14:57:36 -0500
- Previous message: Spinal Immobilization question
- Next message: Splenic injury - non-op management?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01C1ADB6.31035680 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1ADB6.31035680" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1ADB6.31035680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dr. Zidan, Nope. But then, I'm not sure the onus is mine: after all, it is the Cochrane Group which failed to reach a scientifically supportable, clinically applicable conclusion, but nonetheless elected to suggest a creative hypothesis--which people seem curiously attracted to... Pret Bjorn, RN The Bjorn Group -----Original Message----- From: alaa zidan [mailto:azidan@batelco.com.bh] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:59 PM To: trauma-list@trauma.org; trauma-list@trauma.org Subject: RE: Spinal Immobilization question Hi trouble maker , do you know about a study that disapprove the conclusion of cochrane group ANOTHER TROUBLE MAKER DR. ALAA ZIDAN Orthopaedic surgeon&Team leader Accident&Emergency Dept. Salmanyia medical complex,Manama, Bahrain -------Original Message------- From: trauma-list@trauma.org <mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org> Date: Monday, February 04, 2002 09:43:24 PM To: 'trauma-list@trauma.org' <mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org> Subject: RE: Spinal Immobilization question Dr. Coats, At the risk of waxing uppity (me?), I think the Cochrane Group's conclusions in this regard are whacked. Prefaced by a lack of evidence in any direction (the reader is left to regard this as unsettling), they nonetheless suggest that spinal immobilization may result in preventable morbidity and mortality via airway compromise. They fail to admit that an absence of randomized controlled trials is likely a reflection of the empirical value of spinal immobilization. A superior study would require half of spine-injured patients to randomly go un-immobilized. Love to see that presented to the Human Subjects Committee. "Because airway obstruction is a major cause of preventable death in trauma patients, and spinal immobilisation, particularly of the cervical spine, can [sic] contribute to airway compromise, the possibility that immobilisation may increase mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded." Hmm. I think I follow. Let me try one: "Because serial killers are typically white males, and white men comprise the majority of western neurosurgeons, there exists the possibility that your local brain guy may have a freezer full of dismembered prostitutes." Wow. That's easy! Gotta get me a consulting job. Now, before we go comparing long boards to PASG's, let's be sure we've zeroed the scales: A long board is just a Big Frigging Splint (BFS). Nobody ever promised much more or less. PASG's were long promoted by the military--followed promptly by manufacturers--under the unsubstantiated assumption that they accomplished some sort of curious autotransfusion, thereby ameliorating hypoperfusion with limited untoward effects. Each of these notions has been repeatedly and scientifically debunked, while the humble claims of BFS's remain unblemished (see paragraph #1). I for one would resist packing away the long boards just yet. Pret Bjorn, RN Troublemaker ____________________________________________________ <http://www.incredimail.com/redir.asp?ad_id=309&lang=9> IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - <http://www.incredimail.com/redir.asp?ad_id=309&lang=9> Click Here ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1ADB6.31035680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR><!--IncrdiXMLRemarkStart> <IncrdiX-Info> <X-FID>FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000</X-FID> <X-FVER></X-FVER> <X-CNT>;</X-CNT> </IncrdiX-Info> <IncrdiXMLRemarkEnd--></HEAD> <BODY background="" bgColor=#ffffff scroll=yes style="BACKGROUND-POSITION: 0px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 1px" X-FVER="2.0" ORGYPOS="0"> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002>Dr. Zidan,</SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002>Nope.</SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002>But then, I'm not sure the onus is mine: after all, it is the Cochrane Group which failed to reach a scientifically supportable, clinically applicable conclusion, but nonetheless elected to suggest a creative hypothesis--which people seem curiously attracted to...</SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002>Pret Bjorn, RN</SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002>The Bjorn Group</SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN><SPAN class=120402519-04022002></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><SPAN class=120402519-04022002> </SPAN>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> alaa zidan [mailto:azidan@batelco.com.bh]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 04, 2002 1:59 PM<BR><B>To:</B> trauma-list@trauma.org; trauma-list@trauma.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: Spinal Immobilization question<BR><BR></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE></FONT> <TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 id=INCREDIMAINTABLE width="95%"> <TBODY> <TR> <TD id=INCREDITEXTREGION style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; PADDING-LEFT: 7px; PADDING-RIGHT: 7px" width="100%"> <DIV>Hi trouble maker , do you know about a study that disapprove the conclusion of cochrane group</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>ANOTHER TROUBLE MAKER</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <P> <STRONG>DR. ALAA ZIDAN</STRONG> Orthopaedic surgeon&Team leader Accident&Emergency Dept. Salmanyia medical complex,Manama, Bahrain</P> <P><STRONG></STRONG> </P> <DIV id=IncrediOriginalMessage><I>-------Original Message-------</I></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV id=receivestrings> <DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>From:</B></I> <A href="mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A></DIV> <DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>Date:</B></I> Monday, February 04, 2002 09:43:24 PM</DIV> <DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>To:</B></I> <A href="mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">'trauma-list@trauma.org'</A></DIV> <DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>Subject:</B></I> RE: Spinal Immobilization question</DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV align=left><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2>Dr. Coats,<BR><BR>At the risk of waxing uppity (me?), I think the Cochrane Group's conclusions in this regard are whacked. </FONT></DIV> <DIV align=left><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV align=left><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2>Prefaced by a lack of evidence in any direction (the reader is left to regard this as unsettling), they nonetheless suggest that spinal immobilization may result in preventable morbidity and mortality via airway compromise. They fail to admit that an absence of randomized controlled trials is likely a reflection of the empirical value of spinal immobilization. A superior study would require half of spine-injured patients to randomly go un-immobilized. Love to see that presented to the Human Subjects Committee.<BR><BR>"Because airway obstruction is a major cause of preventable death in trauma patients, and spinal immobilisation, particularly of the cervical spine, can [sic] contribute to airway compromise, the possibility that immobilisation may increase mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded."<BR><BR>Hmm. I think I follow. Let me try one:<BR><BR>"Because serial killers are typically white males, and white men comprise the majority of western neurosurgeons, there exists the possibility that your local brain guy may have a freezer full of dismembered prostitutes."<BR><BR>Wow. That's easy! Gotta get me a consulting job.<BR><BR>Now, before we go comparing long boards to PASG's, let's be sure we've zeroed the scales:<BR></DIV></FONT> <DIV align=left><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2>A long board is just a Big Frigging Splint (BFS). Nobody ever promised much more or less. <BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV align=left><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2>PASG's were long promoted by the military--followed promptly by manufacturers--under the unsubstantiated assumption that they accomplished some sort of curious autotransfusion, thereby ameliorating hypoperfusion with limited untoward effects. Ea</FONT><FONT color=#800000 face=Arial size=2>ch of these notions has been repeatedly and scientifically debunked, while the humble claims of BFS's remain unblemished (see paragraph #1).<BR><BR>I for one would resist packing away the long boards just yet.<BR><BR>Pret Bjorn, RN<BR>Troublemaker<BR></DIV></FONT> <DIV> </DIV></TD></TR> <TR> <TD id=INCREDIFOOTER width="100%"> <TABLE cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"> <TBODY> <TR> <TD width="100%"></TD> <TD align=middle id=INCREDISOUND vAlign=bottom></TD> <TD align=middle id=INCREDIANIM vAlign=bottom></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><SPAN id=IncrediStamp><SPAN dir=ltr><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>____________________________________________________<BR><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2><A href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/"http://www.incredimail.com/redir.asp?ad_id=309&lang=9"><IMG align=baseline alt="" border=0 hspace=0 src="cid:120402519@04022002-24ae"></A> <I>IncrediMail</I> - <B>Email has finally evolved</B> - </FONT><A href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002/"http://www.incredimail.com/redir.asp?ad_id=309&lang=9"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><B><U>Click Here</U></B></FONT></A></SPAN></SPAN></FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1ADB6.31035680-- ------_=_NextPart_000_01C1ADB6.31035680 Content-Type: image/gif; name="ATT293412.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ATT293412.gif" Content-ID: <120402519@04022002-24ae> R0lGODlhFAAPALMIAP9gAM9gAM8vAM9gL/+QL5AvAGAvAP9gL////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAACH/C05FVFNDQVBFMi4wAwEAAAAh+QQJFAAIACwAAAAAFAAPAAAEVRDJSaudJuudrxlEKI6B URlCUYyjKpgYAKSgOBSCDEuGDKgrAtC3Q/R+hkPJEDgYCjpKr5A8WK9OaPFZwHoPqm3366VKyeRt E30tVVRscMHDqV/u+AgAIfkEBWQACAAsAAAAABQADwAABBIQyUmrvTjrzbv/YCiOZGmeaAQAIfkE CRQACAAsAgABABAADQAABEoQIUOrpXIOwrsPxiQUheeRAgUA49YNhbCqK1kS9grQhXGAhsDBUJgZ AL2Dcqkk7ogFpvRAokSn0p4PO6UIuUsQggSmFjKXdAgRAQAh+QQFCgAIACwAAAAAFAAPAAAEEhDJ Sau9OOvNu/9gKI5kaZ5oBAAh+QQJFAAIACwCAAEAEAANAAAEShAhQ6ulcg7Cuw/GJBSF55ECBQDj 1g2FsKorWRL2CtCFcYCGwMFQmBkAvYNyqSTuiAWm9ECiRKfSng87pQi5SxCCBKYWMpd0CBEBACH5 BAVkAAgALAAAAAAUAA8AAAQSEMlJq7046827/2AojmRpnmgEADs= ------_=_NextPart_000_01C1ADB6.31035680--
- Previous message: Spinal Immobilization question
- Next message: Splenic injury - non-op management?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
