Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Venting subcutaneous emphysema
Chris Anstey trauma-list@trauma.orgWed, 09 Jan 2002 11:43:35 +1000
- Previous message: Venting subcutaneous emphysema
- Next message: Venting subcutaneous emphysema
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Venting subcutaneous air through cutaneous incisions used to be called 'dea= th by a thousand cuts' and is not indicated. Check to make sure the drain is actually in the right place and draining co= rrectly. Ignore the subcut air - it'll go away in its own good time once th= e lung leak seals.=20 Regards, Chris Anstey Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Anstey Director, ICU Sunshine Coast Health Services District Queensland Australia Ph +617 5470 6600 Fax +616 5470 6841 Email chris_anstey@health.qld.gov.au >>> Ronald Simon <Traumamd@nyc.rr.com> 01/09/02 10:05am >>> I have a case i'd like your opinion on. Sorry for the multi listing but=20 this problem crosses specialties. A 48 yo woman victim of MVC. Has multiple rib fx, pulm contusions, R=20 pneumothorax for which a chest tube was placed. Patient now several days=20 out chest tube still has small airleak, lung is up on chest xray. She=20 has over the last few days developed significant subcut emphysema of her=20 chest and face. My collegue wants to place a mediastinal "vent" (small=20 incision above the manubrium to allow the air to escape). This does not=20 make sense to me but in trying to be open minded i'm wondering if this=20 is a described treatment. As far as i'm concerned as long as the chest=20 tube is controlling the leak, the SQ air is unsightly and has no adverse=20 effects unlike making a connection between the mediastinum and the=20 outside world. Thanks for your input Ron Simon, MD Jacobi Medical Center Bronx, NY ********************************************************************** This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential=20 and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality=20 is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended=20 recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error. =20 Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review=20 of this e-mail is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of=20 confidentiality if it relates to health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this=20 e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by=20 telephone or by return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail=20 message and destroy any hard copies produced. **********************************************************************
- Previous message: Venting subcutaneous emphysema
- Next message: Venting subcutaneous emphysema
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
